分析预见性护理措施对手背深度烧伤手术植皮及术后功能的影响

The influence of skin grafting and postoperative function were analyzed

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.jmnm.202200393
刊名
Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS
年,卷(期) 2022, 1(6)
作者
作者单位

烟台毓璜顶医院 山东烟台 ;

摘要
分析手背深度烧伤手术植皮用预见性护理的价值。方法 对 2020 年 10 月-2022 年 5 月本科接诊手背深度烧伤手术植皮病人(n=50)进行随机分组,试验和对照组各 25 人,前者采取预见性护理,后者行常规护理。对比植皮成活率等指标。结果 关于植皮成活率,试验组数据 96.0%,和对照组数据 80.0%相比更高(P<0.05)。关于手指关节活动度,干预结束时:试验组数据(203.85±27.14)°,和对照组数据(129.67±29.51)°相比更高(P<0.05)。至于满意度,试验组数据 100.0%,和对照组数据 84.0%相比更高(P<0.05)。关于并发症,试验组发生率 0.0%,和对照组 16.0%相比更低(P<0.05)。关于 sf-36 评分,干预结束时:试验组数据(86.92±3.15)分,和对照组数据(79.48±4.26)分相比更高(P<0.05)。结论 手背深度烧伤手术植皮用预见性护理,病人的预后更好,植皮成功率更高,并发症发生率更低,手指关节活动度改善更加明显,满意度提升更为迅速。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the value of skin care for deep burn. Methods Patients (n=50) fromOctober 2020 to May 2022 received 25 patients, and the former received predictive care and routine care. Contrastskin graft survival rate and other indicators. Results Regarding the skin graft survival rate, 96.0% in the test groupdata were higher than 80.0% in the control group data (P <0.05). Regarding mobility of finger joints, at the end ofthe intervention: trial group data (203.85 ± 27.14) and higher (control data, 129.67 ± 29.51) (P <0.05). As for thesatisfaction rate, the test group data was 100.0%, which was higher than the control group data of 84.0% (P <0.05).Regarding complications, the incidence rate of 0.0% was lower than 16.0% in the control group (P <0.05).Regarding the sf-36 score, the end of the intervention was higher by the trial group data (86.92 ± 3.15) and higherthan the control group data (79.48 ± 4.26) (P <0.05). Conclusion Patients have better prognosis, higher success rateof skin grafting, lower complication rate, better improvement of finger joint mobility, and more rapid improvementof satisfaction.
关键词
预见性护理;满意度;手背深度烧伤;并发症
KeyWord
Predictive nursing; satisfaction; deep back of the hand burns; complications
基金项目
页码 194-196
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

邢婉玉,毕庆霞,贺永超*,孙腾,李健洋. 分析预见性护理措施对手背深度烧伤手术植皮及术后功能的影响 [J]. 现代护理医学杂志. 2022; 1; (6). 194 - 196.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构