超声刀在胃肠外科手术的临床效果观察
Clinical observation of ultrasonic knife in gastrointestinal surgery
ES评分 0
| DOI |
10.12208/j.imrf.20220197 |
| 刊名 |
International Medical Research Frontier
|
| 年，卷(期) |
2022, 6(6) |
| 作者 |
|
| 作者单位 |
承德医学院 河北承德 ;
|
| 摘要 |
研究分析超声刀在胃肠外科手术的临床效果。方法 研究对象共选取了2021年6月至2022年5月胃肠外科收治的患者200例，这些患者接受随机分组后在治疗期间分别配合超声刀和电刀治疗，对比两组患者的治疗效果。结果 研究组患者的术中出血量（86.08±6.65）ml，手术时间（119.63±15.62）min，腹腔引流量（153.32±15.45）ml，并发症发生率为3.0%，对照组患者的术中出血量（175.39±4.62）ml，手术时间（146.45±15.52）min，腹腔引流量（174.62±17.52）ml，并发症发生率为13.0%，研究组各项指标与对照组相比均明显更好。组间对比差异显著（p<0.05）。结论 对胃肠外科手术患者实施超声刀治疗的效果更好，且治疗有更高的安全性。
|
| Abstract |
Objective To study and analyze the clinical effect of ultrasonic knife in gastrointestinal surgery. Methods A total of 200 patients admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal surgery from June 2021 to May 2022 were selected for the study. These patients were randomized and then treated with ultrasonic knife or electroknife respectively during the treatment period, and the therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results The intraoperative blood loss of the study group was (86.08±6.65) ml, the operative time was (119.63±15.62) min, the intraperitoneal drainage volume was (153.32±15.45) ml, and the complication rate was 3.0%. The intraoperative blood loss of the control group was (175.39±4.62) ml. The operation time was (146.45±15.52) min, the intraperitoneal drainage volume was (174.62±17.52) ml, and the complication rate was 13.0%. All the indexes in the study group were significantly better than those in the control group. There were significant differences in comparison between groups (p<0.05). Conclusion Ultrasonic scalpel therapy is more effective and safe for gastrointestinal surgery patients.
|
| 关键词 |
超声刀；胃肠外科手术；临床效果
|
| KeyWord |
ultrasonic knife; Gastrointestinal surgery; Clinical effect
|
| 基金项目 |
|
| 页码 |
18-20 |
李天文*,游鑫平.
超声刀在胃肠外科手术的临床效果观察 [J].
国际医药研究前沿.
2022; 6; (6).
18 - 20.