喹硫平辅助治疗症状控制不佳GAD 的疗效观察

喹硫平辅助治疗症状控制不佳GAD 的疗效观察

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2016, 43(4)
作者
作者单位

四川广元市精神卫生中心(广元,628000) ;
四川广元市精神卫生中心 ;

摘要
目的 探讨喹硫平联合常规抗焦虑药物对症状控制不佳广泛性焦虑(GAD)患者疗效及安全性的影响。方法 以我院2014 年1~12 月收治症状控制不佳GAD 患者130 例作为研究对象,采用随机抽样方法分为对照组和治疗组,每组65 例;对照组患者给予常规抗焦虑药物方案治疗,治疗组患者则在对照组基础上加用喹硫平辅助治疗;比较两组患者临床疗效,治疗前后汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评分、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS)评分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)评分及不良反应发生率等。结果 治疗组患者临床疗效显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=9.75,P<0.05);治疗组患者治疗后2、4 及8 周HAMA 量表评分、TAS 量表评分及PSQI 量表评分均显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组患者头晕发生率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.71,P<0.05);两组患者失眠、便秘及食欲减退发生率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.14,1.33,3.40,P<0.05)。结论 喹硫平辅助常规抗焦虑药物方案对症状控制不佳GAD 患者在改善焦虑症状,减轻述情障碍程度及提高睡眠质量方面优势明显,安全性需要进一步验证。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical effects and safety of quetiapine combined with conventionalanti-anxiety drugs on patients with generalized anxiety disorder( GAD)whose symptoms under poor control. Methods From January 2014 to December 2014,130 GAD patients with symptoms for poor control were chosen in our hospitaland randomly divided into control group and treatment group,65 cases in each group. Patients in control group weregiven routine anti-anxiety drug therapy,while the patients in treatment group were treated with quetiapine on the basisof the control group. Clinical effects,HAMA scores,TAS scores and PSQI scores before and after treatment andthe adverse reaction incidence of both groups were compared. Results The clinical effect of treatment group was significantlybetter than the control group,the difference was statistically significant( χ2=9.75,P<0.05). The HAMAscores,TAS scores and PSQI scores in 2,4 and 8 weeks after treatment of the treatment group was significantly betterthan control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The incidence of dizziness in the treatmentgroup was significantly higher than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(χ2=8.71,P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of insomnia,constipation andloss of appetite(χ2=2.14,1.33,3.40,P>0.05). Conclusion Quetiapine assisted with conventional anti-anxietyscheme in the treatment of GAD patients with symptoms for poor control possess the advantages including improvinganxiety symptoms,reducing the alexithymia degree and enhancing the quality of sleep but it may increase the risk ofadverse effects.
关键词
喹硫平;GAD;疗效;安全性
KeyWord
Quetiapine; GAD;Clinical Effects;Safety
基金项目
页码 633-635
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

许可*,王徳燧,李真,何宇. 喹硫平辅助治疗症状控制不佳GAD 的疗效观察 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2016; 43; (4). 633 - 635.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构