微型种植体支抗治疗青少年口腔正畸的疗效及安全性评价

Efficacy and safety evaluation of micro-implant anchorage in the treatment of adolescent orthodontics

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j. iosr.20220013
刊名
International Oral Science Research
年,卷(期) 2022, 1(1)
作者
作者单位

山东省平阴县中医医院 山东济南 ;

摘要
评价微型种植体支抗技术用于治疗口腔正畸疗效。方法 对本院牙科接收的口腔正畸患者的临床信息进行回顾和整理,选择其中2019年7月至2021年1月的60例患者纳入实验,根据随机法将60例患者分为两组(对照组、实验组),每组均有30例患者。本次研究中,对照组患者在接受治疗时选择非种植体支抗进行治疗,实验组内患者则选择微型种植体支抗进行治疗,治疗后评估两组患者的治疗效果。结果 在本次试验结果中显示,相较于对照组来说,实验组患者治疗后,总有效率明显更优,数据进行对比分析存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论 在本次研究结果中显示相较于非种植体支抗治疗来说,应用微型种植体支抗的口腔正畸效果更为良好,能够改善患者的口腔状况,保障患者的治疗效果。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of micro-implant anchorage technology in the treatment of orthodontics. Methods The clinical information of orthodontic patients received by dentistry in our hospital was reviewed and sorted, 60 patients from July 2019 to January 2021 were selected for inclusion in the experiment, and 60 patients were randomly divided into two groups ( The control group and the experimental group), with 30 patients in each group. In this study, patients in the control group chose non-implant anchorage for treatment, while patients in the experimental group chose micro-implant anchorage for treatment, and the therapeutic effects of the two groups of patients were evaluated after treatment. Results The results of this trial showed that compared with the control group, the total effective rate of the patients in the experimental group was significantly better after treatment, and there was a statistical difference in the data comparison analysis (P<0.05). Conclusion The results of this study show that compared with non-implant anchorage treatment, the application of micro-implant anchorage has better orthodontic effect, which can improve the patients oral condition and ensure the patients treatment effect.
关键词
微型种植体支抗技术;口腔正畸;固定矫治器;正畸治疗
KeyWord
Micro-implant anchorage technology; Orthodontics; Fixed appliances; Orthodontic treatment
基金项目
页码 50-52
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

董婧*,李玉美,杨廷忠. 微型种植体支抗治疗青少年口腔正畸的疗效及安全性评价 [J]. 国际口腔科学研究. 2022; 1; (1). 50 - 52.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构