全面护理干预应用在胆结石患者护理中对患者满意度及医患关系的影响研究

Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on patients satisfaction and doctor-patient relationship in the care of patients with gallstone

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.jacn.20220135
刊名
Journal of Advances in Clinical Nursing
年,卷(期) 2022, 1(3)
作者
作者单位

河北中石油中心医院 河北廊坊 ;

摘要
分析胆结石患者护理中给予全面护理干预的效果。方法 筛选于本院在2020年2月-2021年2月期间收治的78例胆结石患者。以随机数字表法分组,其中实验组采取全面护理,对照组采取常规护理,每组各39例。比较两组护理效果。结果 实验组护理有效率相比较对照组较高(P<0.05)。实验组焦虑、抑郁评分相比较对照组较低(P<0.05)。实验组护理满意度相比较对照组较高(P<0.05)。结论 于胆结石患者护理中采取全面护理干预的效果明显,可消除患者的负面情绪,提升患者生活质量,提高患者的护理满意度,进而促进医患关系。此种方法可在临床上予以推广。
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in nursing of patients with gallstones. Methods: A total of 78 patients with gallstones who were admitted to our hospital from February 2020 to February 2021 were screened. They were divided into groups by random number table method, in which the experimental group received comprehensive nursing, and the control group received routine nursing, with 39 cases in each group. The nursing effects of the two groups were compared. Results: The nursing effective rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The anxiety and depression scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in the nursing of patients with gallstones is obvious, which can eliminate the negative emotions of patients, improve the quality of life of patients, improve the nursing satisfaction of patients, and then promote the relationship between doctors and patients. This method can be extended clinically.
关键词
全面护理;负面情绪;胆结石;护理有效率;满意度;医患关系
KeyWord
Comprehensive Nursing; Negative Emotions; Gallstones; Nursing Efficiency; Satisfaction; Doctor-Patient Relationship
基金项目
页码 152-154
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

匙婧*. 全面护理干预应用在胆结石患者护理中对患者满意度及医患关系的影响研究 [J]. 临床护理进展. 2022; 1; (3). 152 - 154.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构