以混合教学模式为基础的《妇产科护理学》课程思政教育实践与研究

Practice and Research on Ideological and political education of Obstetrics and gynecology nursing based on mixed teaching mode

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j. ijog.20220060
刊名
International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
年,卷(期) 2022, 2(3)
作者
作者单位

青海大学附属医院(青海大学临床医学院) 青海西宁 ;

摘要
《妇产科护理》是护理专业的一门涉及范围广和整体性较强的课程,它以妇产科的系统理论为基础,是研究妇女在非妊娠期、妊娠期、分娩期、产褥期、胎儿及新生儿的生理、病理变化,还包括心里、社会与优生育等综合性内容。通过学习和实践,使学生具备本专业所必需的妇产科护理的专业知识和专业技能,运用护理程序事实整体护理。融课程思政于《妇产科护理》课程教学,旨在帮助学生养成良好的职业素质和细心严谨的工作作风使得护理教育实现“理论”和“实践”相融,培养完整的护理人,体现全程、全人的护理教育理念,落实立德树人根本任务[1]。基于此,文章对以混合教学模式为基础的《妇产科护理学》课程思政教育实践进行研究。
Abstract
Obstetrics and gynecology nursing is a course of nursing specialty with wide range and strong integrity. Based on the systematic theory of Obstetrics and Gynecology, it studies the physiological and patho- logical changes of women in non pregnancy, pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium, fetus and newborn, and also includes comprehensive contents such as psychology, society and optimal birth. Through learning and practice, students will have the professional knowledge and skills of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing necessary for their major, and use nursing procedures to practice holistic nursing. Integrating curriculum ideology and politics into the teaching of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing aims to help students develop good professional quality and careful and rigorous work style, make nursing education integrate "theory" with "practice", train complete nurses, embody the whole process and all-round nursing education concept, and implement the fundamental task of Building Morality and cultivating people[1]. Based on this, this paper studies the practice of Ideological and political edu- cation in the course of Obstetrics and gynecology nursing based on the mixed teaching mode.
关键词
混合式教学;“妇产科护理学”课程;课程思政
KeyWord
Mixed teaching; "Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing" course; Curriculum: Ideological and Political Education
基金项目
页码 28-31
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

肖海雪*. 以混合教学模式为基础的《妇产科护理学》课程思政教育实践与研究 [J]. 国际妇产科研究. 2022; 2; (3). 28 - 31.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构