不同入路人工全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的效果比较及护理对策-现代护理医学杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

不同入路人工全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的效果比较及护理对策

Effect comparison and nursing countermeasures of different approaches of total hip replacement in thetreatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly

ES评分 0 浏览量：511 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.12208/j. jmnm.202200161
刊名	现代护理医学杂志 Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS
年，卷(期)	2022, 1(3)
作者	莫桂宁*,
作者单位	南宁市邕宁区中医医院广西南宁 ;
摘要	分析不同入路人工全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的效果比较及护理对策。方法入组本院 2021 年 1 月-2022 年 3 月收治的老年股骨颈骨折患者共 72 例，随机分组，43 例对照组的患者实施传统入路手术和护理，29 例观察组采取 DAA 入路手术治疗和护理。比较效果。结果观察组并发症发生率低于对照组， P＜0.05。观察组患者恢复时间短于对照组（P<0.05）。观察组患者术后生活质量高于对照组， P＜0.05。结论 DAA 入路手术治疗人工全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折并配合有效护理的效果确切。
Abstract	Objective To analyze the effect comparison and nursing strategies of different approaches for total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fractures. Methods A total of 72 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures who were treated in our hospital from January 2021 to March 2022 were enrolled and randomly divided into groups. 43 patients in the control group were treated with traditional approach surgery and nursing, and 29 patients in the observation group were treated with DAA. Surgical treatment and care. Compare effects. Results The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, P<0.05. The recovery time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative quality of life of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, P<0.05. Conclusion DAA approach in the treatment of total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fractures combined with effective nursing is effective.
关键词	不同入路；人工全髋关节置换术；老年股骨颈骨折；效果比较；护理对策
KeyWord	different approaches; Total hip replacement; Femoral neck fracture in the elderly; Effectcomparison; Nursing countermeasures
基金项目
页码	88-90

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 张晓,马胜利,李磊,韩田浦. 不同入路人工髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折效果观察及其对血清骨特异性碱性磷酸酶抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶 5b 水平的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志,2022,51(03):247-250.

[2] 李常奇,陈茂振. 人工全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的效果[J]. 中国城乡企业卫生,2022,37(02):7-9.

[3] 王雷. 人工股骨头置换术与全髋关节置换术治疗老年移位股骨颈骨折的临床疗效观察[J]. 贵州医药,2022,46(01):108-109.

[4] 成兴海,孙焕建.老年股骨颈骨折患者采用全髋与半髋关节置换术治疗的临床效果分析[J].2022,7(1).

[5] 欧非. 全髋关节置换术与人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的分析[J]. 智慧健康,2021,7(33):78-80.

[6] 方云生.不同术式治疗老年股骨颈骨折患者的效果研究[J].2022,36(3).

[7] 刘辉明.人工全髋关节置换术中前外侧入路与后外侧入路的效果和安全性比较[J].2022,43(10).

[8] 谢伟,尚宏喜,孙炜.老年股骨颈骨折患者采用前、后入路髋关节置换术的效果比较[J].2022,32(1).

引用本文

莫桂宁*. 不同入路人工全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的效果比较及护理对策 [J]. 现代护理医学杂志. 2022; 1; (3). 88 - 90.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构