| Abstract |
Objective To study the application value of risk management in the nursing of urological patients. Methods 100 patients with nephrotic syndrome in our hospital from January 2019 to January 2021 were selected as the subjects of this study, and then the selected subjects were divided into control group and observation group according to the random number table method. There were 50 patients in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with routine management, and the patients in the observation group were treated with risk management. The nursing satisfaction of the two groups of patients was compared; the total effective rate of treatment; serum total protein, serum albumin, transferrin ; 24h urine protein quantification, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine; quality of life scores (physiological function, emotional function, physical function, social function). Results The nursing satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was 98.0% (49/50), and the nursing satisfaction of the patients in the control group was 80.0% (40/50), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 96.0% (48/50), and the total effective rate of the control group was 72.0% (36/50), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Protein and transferrin were respectively: (55.94±4.06) g/L, (33.15±2.59) g/L, (1.66±0.23) g/L were lower than those in the control group (59.21±3.82) g/L, ( 37.55±2.90) g/L, (2.25±0.41) g/L, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the 24h urine protein quantification, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine of the observation group were: (0.90±0.42) ) g/24h, (20.12±6.54) mmol/L, (208.34±80.54) μmol/L were lower than those in the control group (2.67±0.71) g/24h, (26.60±8.42) mmol/L, (263.59±82.46 ) μmol/L, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the scores of physiological function, emotional function, physical function and social function of the observation group were: (87.46±6.48) points, (88.19±6.82) points, ( The scores of 90.35±5.49) and (86.15±6.49) were higher than those of the control group (70.16±5.23), (71.16±5.67), (73.85±5.06) and (70.08±5.01), and the differences were statistically significant. (P<0.05). Conclusion In the nursing of patients with nephrotic syndrome, the application of risk management intervention can effectively improve the nursing effect, the application value is high, and it is worthy of promotion.
|