International Journal of Clinical Research

Objective: To analyze the clinical diagnosis and treatment effect of coronary intervention in cardiovascular department. Methods: Patients were divided into groups during 2021.1-2021.12 to analyze the effect difference between drug therapy and coronary interventional therapy. The observation group (50 cases) was treated with interventional diagnosis, and the control group (50 cases) was treated with drug. Results: In the control group, the effective rate was 92.00% (46/50), the patient compliance rate was 90.00% (45/50), and the complication rate was 12.00% (6/50). In the observation group, 98.00% (49/50), 96.00% (48/50), 2.00% (1/50), respectively, the observation group had better effect (P<0.05). Conclusion: Coronary interventional diagnosis can identify the lesion location of patients and improve the clinical treatment effect. Interventional therapy can reduce the bleeding at the puncture site and has a high therapeutic safety.

Cardiovascular Medicine; Coronary Interventional Therapy; Clinical Diagnosis