手术室风险管理在腔镜手术患者护理中的应用

Application of operating room risk management in nursing of patients undergoing endoscopic surgery

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20230037
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2023, 4(2)
作者
作者单位

西北妇女儿童医院 陕西西安 ;

摘要
简述手术室风险管理是否适用于腔镜手术患者护理工作及相关效果。方法 该次实验自2021年2月开始,至2022年2月结束,在该时间段内选取87例腔镜手术患者,经随机化分组法,区分组别:对照组,42例,常规手术室护理;观察组,45例,手术室风险管理,将护理质量、护理风险发生率、投诉率、风险认知、满意度用作两组比照指标。结果 观察组的护理质量评分高于对照组;观察组的护理风险发生率、投诉率均低于对照组;观察组的风险知晓率、满意度均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 在腔镜手术患者中实施手术室风险管理,能够提高护理质量,增强护理人员的风险认知,减少风险事件、投诉情况,获取患者及家属满意,可推广。
Abstract
Objective To briefly describe whether risk management in operating room is suitable for nursing of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery and its related effects. Methods The experiment started in February 2021 and ended in February 2022. During this time period, 87 patients with laparoscopic surgery were selected and randomly divided into groups: control group, 42 patients, conventional operating room Nursing; observation group, 45 cases, operating room risk management, nursing quality, nursing risk incidence, complaint rate, risk cognition, and satisfaction were used as the comparison indicators of the two groups. Results The nursing quality score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group; the nursing risk incidence rate and complaint rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group; the risk awareness rate and satisfaction rate of the observation group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The implementation of operating room risk management in patients with endoscopic surgery can improve the quality of nursing, enhance the risk awareness of nurses, reduce risk events and complaints, and obtain the satisfaction of patients and their families, which can be promoted.
关键词
手术室风险管理;腔镜手术;护理质量;护理风险;投诉率;风险认知
KeyWord
operating room risk management; laparoscopic surgery; nursing quality; nursing risk; complaint rate; risk perception
基金项目
页码 70-73
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

张蓉,孙芬菊*. 手术室风险管理在腔镜手术患者护理中的应用 [J]. 当代护理. 2023; 4; (2). 70 - 73.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构