信息化护理干预对优化人工喂养新生儿喂养质量的价值分析

Analysis on the value of information-based nursing intervention in optimizing the feeding quality of artificial feeding newborns

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20220421
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2022, 6(10)
作者
作者单位

河北中石油中心医院 河北廊坊 ;

摘要
分析人工喂养新生儿过程中使用信息化护理干预对喂养质量的影响。方法 从2020年1月-2022年1月区间接受人工喂养的新生儿内随机选择40例作为实验对象,根据护理形式对其进行分组,即实验与对照,每组内20例。对照组内新生儿均接受常规护理,实验组内新生儿均接受信息化护理干预,对比相关指标。结果 实验组排便次数、排便量、残奶量优于对照组,P<0.05。实验组每日增加奶量、喂养耐受时间优于对照组,P<0.05。实验组体质量、身长、头围发育优于对照组,P<0.05。结论 人工喂养新生儿时实施信息化护理干预,新生儿的消化功能以及喂养质量较好,且新生儿的生长发育较好,该护理方式值得临床推广。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the influence of information-based nursing intervention on the feeding quality during artificial feeding of newborns. Methods: from January 2020 to January 2022, 40 newborns who were indirectly artificially fed in the district were randomly selected as experimental subjects. They were divided into groups according to the nursing form, i.e. experiment and control, with 20 in each group. The newborns in the control group received routine nursing, and the newborns in the experimental group received information-based nursing intervention. The relevant indicators were compared. Results: the defecation frequency, defecation volume and residual milk volume of the experimental group were better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The daily increase of milk volume and feeding tolerance time in the experimental group were better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The body mass, body length and head circumference of the experimental group were better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: information-based nursing intervention can improve the digestive function and feeding quality of newborns, and the growth and development of newborns are better. This nursing method is worthy of clinical promotion.
关键词
信息化护理干预;人工喂养;新生儿;喂养质量
KeyWord
Information-Based Nursing Intervention; Artificial Feeding; Newborn; Feeding Quality
基金项目
页码 31-33
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

张晶*. 信息化护理干预对优化人工喂养新生儿喂养质量的价值分析 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2022; 6; (10). 31 - 33.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构