International Journal of Surgical Research

Objective To analyze the value of humanized nursing intervention in thoracic surgery. Methods From November 2021 to August 2022,86 patients were treated in the thoracic surgery department and randomly divided into 2 groups. The trial group adopted humanized nursing intervention, and the control group did routine care. Compare the satisfaction degree and other indicators. Results For SDS and SAS scores, at the end of the intervention: (30.24 ± 3.15), (32.68 ± 3.92), and lower (55.26) and (43.79 ± 4.53), respectively (P <0.05) than ± 5.35). For complications, the incidence rate in the trial group was 2.33%, which was lower than the incidence rate of 16.28% of the data in the control group (P <0.05). For length of stay: the test group data (6.97 ± 2.41) d and was shorter (10.52 ± 2.96) (P <0.05) than the control group data d. Regarding satisfaction, the 17% of the trial group data was 97.67%, higher compared with 81.4% in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion humanized nursing intervention in thoracic surgery has lower complication rate, shorter hospital stay, more rapid negative mood relief and more obvious improvement in satisfaction.

thoracic surgery; satisfaction; humanized nursing intervention; complications