叙事护理对恶性黑色素瘤患者心理痛苦和生活质量的影响

Effects of narrative nursing on psychological distress and quality of life in patients with malignantmelanoma

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j. jmnm.202200303
刊名
Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS
年,卷(期) 2022, 1(5)
作者
作者单位

华中科技大学协和深圳医院 广东深圳 ;

摘要
分析叙事护理用于恶性黑色素瘤的价值。方法 对 2020 年 12 月-2022 年 5 月本科接诊恶 性黑色素瘤病人(n=74)进行随机分组,试验和对照组各 37 人,前者采取叙事护理,后者行常规护理。对 比 sf-36 评分等指标。结果 关于心理痛苦评分,在干预结束之时:试验组的数据(1.54±0.47)分,和对照 组(3.28±0.73)分相比更低(P<0.05)。关于 sf-36 评分,在干预结束之时:试验组的数据(86.12±3.29) 分,和对照组(78.54±4.63)分相比更高(P<0.05)。关于护理质量,试验组的数据(97.46±1.82)分,和 对照组(90.58±2.47)分相比更高(P<0.05)。关于满意度,试验组的数据 97.3%,和对照组 78.38%相比 更高(P<0.05)。结论 恶性黑色素瘤用叙事护理,效果更好,满意度更高,生活质量改善也更加明显,心 理痛苦程度减轻更为迅速。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the value of narrative nursing in malignant melanoma. Methods From December 2020 to May 2022, 74 undergraduate patients with malignant melanoma (n=74) were randomly divided into trial group and control group, with 37 patients in each group. The former received narrative nursing, while the latter received routine nursing. The SF-36 score and other indicators were compared. Results At the end of the intervention, the psychological distress score of the experimental group (1.54±0.47) was lower than that of the control group (3.28±0.73) (P < 0.05). Regarding the SF-36 score, at the end of the intervention, the data of the experimental group (86.12±3.29) was higher than that of the control group (78.54±4.63) (P < 0.05). As for the quality of care, the score of the experimental group (97.46±1.82) was higher than that of the control group (90.58±2.47) (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of the experimental group was 97.3%, which was higher than that of the control group (78.38%) (P < 0.05). Conclusion Narrative nursing for malignant melanoma has better effect, higher satisfaction, better quality of life, and more rapid reduction of psychological pain.
关键词
叙事护理;生活质量;恶性黑色素瘤;满意度
KeyWord
narrative nursing; Quality of life; Malignant melanoma; satisfaction
基金项目
页码 120-122
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

周 娟*. 叙事护理对恶性黑色素瘤患者心理痛苦和生活质量的影响 [J]. 现代护理医学杂志. 2022; 1; (5). 120 - 122.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构