综合护理对孤残儿童急性上呼吸道感染的效果研究

Effect of comprehensive nursing on acute upper respiratory tract infection in orphans and disabled children

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j. jmnm.202200317
刊名
Journal of Modern Nursing MedicineJPCNS
年,卷(期) 2022, 1(5)
作者
作者单位

潍坊市儿童福利院 山东潍坊 ;

摘要
分析急性上呼吸道感染患儿内孤残儿童均接受综合护理的恢复情况。方法 从 2020 年 1 月-2022 年 1 月期间因急性上呼吸道感染的患儿内随机选择 76 例实验,依据护理形式分组,即实验与对照, 各组患儿 38 例。对照组患儿整体均接受一般临床护理,实验组患儿整体均接受临床综合护理,对比效果。 结果 实验组生活质量评分中的六个项目均显著高于对照组的各项评分,对比发现 P<0.05。实验组总满意 度为 97.37%。对照组总满意度为 81.58%。对比发现 P<0.05。实验组依从性高于对照组,P<0.05。结论 对 急性上呼吸道感染的孤残儿童实施综合护理,可以改善患儿的生活质量,提升依从性以及满意度,让其积 极配合临床诊治。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the recovery of orphans and disabled children in children with acute upper respiratory tract infection who received comprehensive care. Methods: From January 2020 to January 2022, 76 children with acute upper respiratory tract infection were randomly selected for the experiment. They were grouped according to the form of nursing, that is, experiment and control, with 38 children in each group. The children in the control group received general clinical nursing as a whole, while the children in the experimental group received comprehensive clinical nursing as a whole, and the effects were compared. Results The scores of six items in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The total satisfaction of the experimental group was 97.37%. The total satisfaction of the control group was 81.58%. It was found that P < 0.05. The compliance of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing for orphans and disabled children with acute upper respiratory tract infection can improve their quality of life, enhance their compliance and satisfaction, and make them actively cooperate with clinical diagnosis and treatment.
关键词
综合护理;孤残儿童;急性上呼吸道感染
KeyWord
comprehensive nursing; Orphans and disabled children; Acute upper respiratory tract infection
基金项目
页码 162-164
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

王秀娟*. 综合护理对孤残儿童急性上呼吸道感染的效果研究 [J]. 现代护理医学杂志. 2022; 1; (5). 162 - 164.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构