人工智能司法裁判的可能性限度

The limit of possibility of artificial intelligence judicial adjudication

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.sdr.20220090
刊名
Scientific Development Research
年,卷(期) 2022, 2(3)
作者
作者单位

浙江工商大学 浙江杭州 ;

摘要
人工智能研究热潮的兴起使使得法学人工智能的研究得到了空前的发展,人工智能应用于司法裁判有利于消除司法人员在决策过程中可能存在的认知偏见并最大程度的实现“同案同判”,但由于人工智能本身存在缺陷以及司法裁判本身的特殊性,目前想要以人工智能替代法官进行司法裁判缺乏现实可行性及许多潜在风险。未来人工智能的定位以及如何更好的应用并服务于司法裁判是现在亟待研究并解决的问题。
Abstract
The rise of artificial intelligence research has made the research of legal artificial intelligence have achieved unprecedented development. The application of artificial intelligence to judicial adjudication is conducive to eliminating the cognitive biases that may exist in the decision-making process of judicial personnel and to the greatest extent. However, due to the defects of artificial intelligence itself and the particularity of judicial adjudication itself, it is currently unfeasible and many potential risks to replace judges with artificial intelligence for judicial adjudication. The positioning of artificial intelligence in the future and how to better apply and serve judicial adjudication are issues that need to be studied and solved urgently.
关键词
人工智能;司法裁判;算法;数据
KeyWord
artificial intelligence; judicial adjudication; algorithm; data
基金项目
页码 108-113
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

谢昕彤*. 人工智能司法裁判的可能性限度 [J]. 科学发展研究. 2022; 2; (3). 108 - 113.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构