综合干预对重性精神病患者危险性行为的效果分析

Comprehensive intervention in rural communities have dangerous behavior of patients with severe mental illness rehabilitation effect of the control study

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2017, 44(1)
作者
作者单位

广西壮族自治区脑科医院 ;

摘要
目的:探讨综合干预模式对农村社区重性精神疾病患者危险性行为的的防治效果。方法:在己开展686项目管理的农村社区选取有危险性行为的重性精神疾病患者105例(实际完成99例)进行综合干预(实验组),并与另一已开展686项目管理的农村社区的110例(实际完成100例)进行对照(对照组)。实验组根据患者的实际情况在常规药物治疗的基础上进行心理干预、家庭干预、劳动干预等综合干预模式,对照组只接受常规药物治疗,不进行综合干预,两组均干预1年。分别于干预前、干预6个月末和干预12个月末进行阳性与阴性症状评定量表(PANSS)、躁狂量表、抑郁量表、危险性行为评估量表评估。结果:干预6个月和干预12个月,实验组和对照组的PANSS总分、躁狂评分、抑郁评分较干预前差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组间比较,PANSS总分、阳性症状、阴性症状评分、躁狂评分、抑郁评分差异均有统计学意义(p<0.01)。对照组危险性行为再次发生率高于实验组(p<0.01),差异有统计学意义。 结论:综合干预模式有助于降低危险性行为的再次发生率,提高治疗效果。
Abstract
objective: To study the effect of comprehensive intervention on the prevention and treatment of the risk behaviors of rural community patients with severe mental illness. Methods: In 686 project management of rural communities, the 105 cases of patients (the actual completion of 99 cases) with severe mental illness who taken the sexual risk behaviors were selected as experimental group and received comprehensive intervention; another 686 project management of the rural community, 110 cases (the actual completion of 100 cases) were selected and set as control group. According to the actual situation of the patients, the experimental group received the intervention model which included psychological intervention, family intervention, labor intervention ect, on the basis of conventional drug treatment; the control group only received routine drug treatment, did not received comprehensive intervention, two groups both received the intervention for 1 year. Respectively before intervention, 6 months and intervention 12 month, the positive and negative symptom rating scale (PANSS), Mania Rating Scale, HAMD, dangerous sexual behavior assessment scale were evaluated. Results: Intervention for 6 months and 12 months, the PANSS total score, manic score, depression score in the experimental group and the control group of than the intervention before the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05), the PANSS total score, positive symptoms, negative symptoms score, manic score, depression scores between the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.01). The recurrence rate of risk behaviors in control group was higher than that in the experimental group (p<0.01), and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: Comprehensive intervention model can help to reduce the risk of recurrence rate and improve the treatment effect.
关键词
重性精神疾病患者;危险性行为;综合干预
KeyWord
patients with severe mental illness; risk behavior; comprehensive intervention
基金项目
页码 49-52
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

刘顺发*. 综合干预对重性精神病患者危险性行为的效果分析 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2017; 44; (1). 49 - 52.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构