PRP与玻璃酸钠注射液关节腔内注射治疗老年退变性膝骨关节炎的临床疗效对比-国际临床研究杂志-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

PRP与玻璃酸钠注射液关节腔内注射治疗老年退变性膝骨关节炎的临床疗效对比

Comparison of clinical efficacy between PRP and sodium hyaluronate injection for intra-articular injection in the treatment of elderly degenerative knee osteoarthritis

ES评分 0 浏览量：147 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.12208/j.ijcr.20260300
刊名	国际临床研究杂志 International Journal of Clinical Research
年，卷(期)	2026, 10(6)
作者	宋成福,
作者单位	长春仲德骨科医院吉林长春;
摘要	目的对比富血小板血浆（PRP）与玻璃酸钠注射液关节腔内注射治疗老年退变性膝骨关节炎（KOA）的临床疗效。方法选取2024年12月-2025年12月收治的老年退变性KOA患者120例，分两组，各60例。对照组采取玻璃酸钠注射液治疗方案，实验组采用PRP注射治疗方案。对比两组临床疗效、疼痛缓解程度、关节功能改善情况以及生活质量。结果实验组总有效率明显高于对照组；实验组治疗后VAS疼痛评分低于对照组，膝关节KSS评分及生活质量评分高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论关节腔内注射PRP与玻璃酸钠均可改善老年KOA患者疼痛与关节功能，PRP在中长期疗效、炎症控制及功能恢复上更具优势，安全性良好，更适合作为老年退变性膝骨关节炎的优选方案。
Abstract	Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of intra-articular injection of platelet rich plasma (PRP) and sodium hyaluronate injection in the treatment of elderly degenerative knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods 120 elderly patients with degenerative KOA admitted from December 2024 to December 2025 were selected and divided into two groups, with 60 patients in each group. The control group was treated with sodium hyaluronate injection, while the experimental group was treated with PRP injection. Compare the clinical efficacy, pain relief, joint function improvement, and quality of life between two groups. Results The total effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group; After treatment, the VAS pain score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group, and the knee joint KSS score and quality of life score were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Both intra-articular injection of PRP and sodium hyaluronate can improve pain and joint function in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis. PRP has more advantages in medium and long-term efficacy, inflammation control, and functional recovery, with good safety, and is more suitable as the preferred option for elderly patients with degenerative knee osteoarthritis.
关键词	富血小板血浆（PRP）；玻璃酸钠；膝骨关节炎；关节腔注射；临床疗效
KeyWord	Platelet rich plasma (PRP); Sodium hyaluronate; Knee osteoarthritis; Joint cavity injection; Clinical efficacy
基金项目
页码	115-118

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 王伟,郑晓琳. 富血小板血浆与透明质酸钠关节腔内注射治疗膝骨关节炎术后患者的效果比较
[J]. 中国民康医学,2025,37(9):151-153,157.

[2] 陈秀清,黄秋萍,郭晓佳,等. 玻璃酸钠关节腔内注射联合塞来昔布口服治疗膝骨关节炎的临床效果
[J]. 临床合理用药,2025,18(25):108-111.

[3] 吴建华,杨宝莲,朱小明,等. 通络开痹片联合高渗葡萄糖关节腔内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效
[J]. 中国现代医生,2024,62(22):84-87.

[4] 刘威,李益亮,孙绍裘. 丹紫康膝冲剂联合关节腔内注射玻璃酸钠对肝肾亏虚型膝骨关节炎患者的影响
[J]. 中国伤残医学,2024,32(21):54-57,66.

[5] 陈卫华,庄卫生,黄韶辉. 消瘀通膝汤熏蒸联合关节腔内富血小板血浆注射治疗膝骨关节炎的效果
[J]. 河南医学研究,2024,33(15):2830-2835.

[6] 李德富. 玻璃酸钠关节腔内注射联合等速肌力训练治疗膝骨关节炎的临床效果观察
[J]. 首都食品与医药, 2023,30(15):43-45.

[7] 肖芳勤. 曲安奈德联合玻璃酸钠关节腔内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的临床疗效及对骨质代谢的影响
[J]. 北方药学,2024,21(12):29-31.

[8] 王嘉兴,顾秀云,刘琪. 膝关节镜清理术辅助关节腔内注射PRP治疗骨关节炎的临床效果分析
[J]. 系统医学, 2025,10(1):80-83.

引用本文

宋成福. PRP与玻璃酸钠注射液关节腔内注射治疗老年退变性膝骨关节炎的临床疗效对比 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2026; 10; (6). 115 - 118.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构