认知及相关哲学问题的探讨-现代社会科学研究-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

认知及相关哲学问题的探讨

The exploration of cognitive and related philosophical issues

ES评分 0 浏览量：75 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.ssr.20260115
刊名	现代社会科学研究 Modern Social Science Research
年，卷(期)	2026, 6(4)
作者	赵山东,
作者单位	湖南省超级计算科学学会湖南长沙
摘要	针对当前认知科学领域本体论定位模糊、理论体系割裂、方法论单一、学科整合性不足、生态效度偏低的系统性困境，本文以认知的本质界定为逻辑起点，采用理论建构与经典实验佐证相结合的研究方法，系统重构了认知的系统性定义与七大核心要素框架，逐层拆解了认知活动从初级感知到高级思维的内在层级加工链条，搭建了描述、解释、预测、验证、修正五大外在表现形式的完整闭环体系，延伸探讨了主客观辩证关系、科学认知适配判定标准、认知相对真理性与科幻构想现实可能性等核心哲学议题，最终构建了一套逻辑自洽、全链条贯通、跨学科兼容的认知理论体系。研究弥补了现有主流认知理论的固有局限，打破了认知科学各分支学科的研究壁垒，为认知科学的跨学科整合、理论完善与实践应用提供了全新的系统性理论框架，也为人工智能类人认知模型构建、个体认知能力提升等实践场景提供了底层逻辑支撑。
Abstract	In response to the systematic predicaments in the field of cognitive science, such as ambiguous ontological positioning, fragmented theoretical systems, monotonous methodology, insufficient disciplinary integration, and low ecological validity, this paper takes the definition of the essence of cognition as the logical starting point, and adopts a research method combining theoretical construction with classic experiments for verification. It systematically reconstructs the systematic definition of cognition and the framework of its seven core elements, gradually disassembles the internal hierarchical processing chain of cognitive activities from primary perception to advanced thinking, builds a complete closed-loop system of description, explanation, prediction, verification, and correction, and extends to explore core philosophical issues such as the dialectical relationship between subjectivity and objectivity, the criteria for scientific cognitive adaptation, the relative truth of cognition, and the realistic possibility of science fiction concepts. Finally, it constructs a set of logically consistent, fully integrated across the entire chain, and compatible with multiple disciplines cognitive theory system. The research has overcome the inherent limitations of existing mainstream cognitive theories, broken through the research barriers of various branches of cognitive science, provided a new systematic theoretical framework for the interdisciplinary integration, theoretical improvement, and practical application of cognitive science, and also provided a bottom-level logical support for practical scenarios such as the construction of human-like cognitive models in artificial intelligence and the enhancement of individual cognitive abilities.
关键词	认知建构；知觉加工；思维模型；科学认知；主客观辩证关系；感觉；具象思维；抽象思维
KeyWord	Cognitive construction; Perception processing; Thinking model; Scientific cognition; The dialectical relationship between subject and object; Sensation; Concrete thinking; Abstract thinking
基金项目
页码	1-24

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 李其维. 认知科学的革命与“第二代认知科学”的纲领性特征
[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(12): 1306-1327.

[2] 刘晓力. 认知科学研究纲领的困境与走向
[J]. 中国社会科学, 2003(1): 99-103.

[3] GARDNER H. The Mind's New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution
[M]. New York: Basic Books, 1987: 6-18.

[4] 彭聃龄. 普通心理学
[M]. 6版. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2023.

[5] NEISSER U. Cognitive Psychology
[M]. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.

[6] 格里格 R J, 津巴多 P G. 心理学与生活
[M]. 20版. 王垒, 译. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2023.

[7] 姚树桥, 杨艳杰. 医学心理学
[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2024.

[8] 斯滕伯格 R J, 斯滕伯格 K. 认知心理学
[M]. 7版. 杨炳钧, 译. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2017.

[9] MCGURK H, MACDONALD J. Hearing lips and seeing voices
[J]. Nature, 1976, 264(5588): 746-748.

[10] RAMACHANDRAN V S, GREGORY R L. Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision
[J]. Nature, 1991, 350(6320): 699-702.

[11] SHEPARD R N, METZLER J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects
[J]. Science, 1971, 171(3972): 701-703.

[12] 卡尼曼 D. 思考,快与慢
[M]. 胡晓姣, 李爱民, 何梦莹, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2012.

[13] 蔡曙山. 认知科学导论
[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021.

[14] 皮亚杰 J. 发生认识论原理
[M]. 王宪钿, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1981.

[15] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集: 第1卷
[M]. 3版. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 编译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.

[16] 马克思, 恩格斯. 马克思恩格斯选集: 第4卷
[M]. 3版. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局, 编译. 北京: 人民出版社, 2012.

[17] 波普尔 K R. 科学发现的逻辑
[M]. 查汝强, 邱仁宗, 译. 北京: 中国美术学院出版社, 2008.

[18] CHERRY E C. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears
[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1953, 25(5): 975-979.

[19] LEDOUX J E. Emotion circuits in the brain
[J]. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2000, 23(1): 155-184.

[20] SIMONS D J, CHABRIS C F. Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events
[J]. Perception, 1999, 28(9): 1059-1074.

[21] TREISMAN A M, GELADE G. A feature-integration theory of attention
[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1980, 12(1): 97-136.

[22] NAVON D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception
[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9(3): 353-383.

[23] 维果茨基 Л С. 思维与语言
[M]. 李维,译。杭州:浙江教育出版社,2015.

[24] 列宁.唯物主义和经验批判主义
[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.人民出版社,2015.

[25] 马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集 (第 3 卷)
[M]. 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.北京:人民出版社,2012.

[26] 库恩 T S. 科学革命的结构 (第四版)
[M]. 金吾伦,胡新和,译.北京大学出版社,2012.

[27] 塞尔 J R. 心灵、语言和社会:实在世界中的哲学
[M]. 李步楼,译.上海译文出版社,2006.

引用本文

赵山东. 认知及相关哲学问题的探讨 [J]. 现代社会科学研究. 2026; 6; (4). 1 - 24.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构