循环经济与固体废弃物资源化利用综述

A review of circular economy and solid waste resource utilization

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.aes.20250019
刊名
Advances in Resources and Environmental Science
年,卷(期) 2025, 4(2)
作者
作者单位

安徽理工大学 安徽淮南

摘要
随着经济社会快速发展,固体废弃物产生量持续增长,给环境带来巨大压力。循环经济理念为固体废弃物管理提供了新的思路,通过“减量化、资源化、无害化”原则,推动废弃物从传统的末端治理向全过程管理转变。本文系统综述了固体废弃物资源化利用的技术路径、管理政策和实践案例,重点分析了化工园区固废综合利用、城乡有机固废资源化、建筑废弃物再生利用等关键技术进展。研究表明,通过技术创新、政策引导和市场化机制协同推进,固体废弃物资源化利用可显著提升资源利用效率,减少环境污染。未来需要进一步完善标准体系、创新商业模式、加强国际合作,推动固体废弃物资源化利用高质量发展,助力实现碳达峰碳中和目标。
Abstract
With the rapid development of the economy and society, the amount of solid waste continues to grow, placing enormous pressure on the environment. The concept of a circular economy provides new ideas for solid waste management by promoting the transformation of waste from traditional end-of-pipe treatment to whole-process management through the principles of "reduction, resource utilization, and harmless treatment." This paper systematically reviews the technical pathways, management policies, and practical cases of resource utilization of solid waste, with a focus on analyzing key technological advancements such as comprehensive utilization of solid waste in chemical parks, resource utilization of urban and rural organic solid waste, and recycled use of construction waste. The study shows that through the coordinated advancement of technological innovation, policy guidance, and market-based mechanisms, resource utilization of solid waste can significantly improve resource efficiency and reduce environmental pollution. In the future, it is necessary to further improve the standard system, innovate business models, and strengthen international cooperation to promote high-quality resource utilization of solid waste and contribute to achieving the carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals.
关键词
循环经济;固体废弃物;资源化利用;废弃物管理;可持续发展
KeyWord
Circular economy; Solid waste; Resource utilization; Waste management; Sustainable development
基金项目
页码 32-42
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

张玲. 循环经济与固体废弃物资源化利用综述 [J]. 资源与环境科学进展. 2025; 4; (2). 32 - 42.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构