社会排斥情境下自动化情绪调节的特点及心理机制的探讨

The characteristics of social exclusion situation automatic emotion regulation and psychological mechanism

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2017, 44(2)
作者
作者单位

武汉大学人民医院精神卫生中心 ;
武汉市武东医院 ;

摘要
【摘要】目的:探究社会排斥情境下自动化情绪调节的特点及心理机制情况。方法:将其分为4个小组,每组30人。具体为放逐表达抑制学习组、放逐认知重评学习组、拒绝表达抑制学习组和拒绝认知重评组。以EC阈下的干预技术为背景,拒绝组进入相互认识范式情境练习,放逐组进入网络掷球范式练习,使用SAM量表,测定情绪。记录即刻情绪效价和唤醒度,实施“100-7”分心任务,在电脑上进行快速自评SAM量表。作为SAM2。结果:所有被使者的SAM1和SAM2均值为,p<0.05.方差分析结果证实,在情境效应显著,P<0.05情况下,策略的主效应并不显著,而交互效应显著性较高,p<0.05.和拒绝表达抑制组相比,拒绝认知重评组显著较大,P<0.05.被放逐组在学习表达抑制策略之后,效果稍好,但差异不明显。结论:在社会排除情境下,自动化情绪调节特征为:拒绝诱发情感解离,实施认知重评之后情绪调节效果好;放逐诱发抑郁情绪,实施表达抑制后情绪调节效果较好;和放逐组相比,拒绝调节效果显著较好。自动化调节心理机制为:放逐/拒绝会启动被实验自动化选择特定情绪调节方式,放逐组在此策略中更加倾向于对反应的灌注,拒绝组经自动化先行关注策略调节情绪。策略和环境因素均能够起到预测调节的效果,策略因素主要起到中介性因素效果。
Abstract
【abstract】objective: to explore the characteristics of social exclusion situation automatic emotion regulation and psychological mechanism. Methods: it can be divided into four groups, each group 30 people. Specific to banish express inhibitory learning group, exiled cognitive reappraisal, learning group, refused to express inhibit learning group, and refused to cognitive reappraisal group. With EC subliminal intervention technology as the background, refused to set into the practice situation, mutual understanding paradigm exile group practice, throw the ball into the network paradigm using SAM scale, determination of emotions. Record immediate emotional valence and arousal, implementation of the "100-7" distraction task, SAM for quick self-assessment scale on the computer. As the SAM2. Results: all the messengers SAM1 and SAM2 averages, p < 0.05. The results of variance analysis confirmed that the context effect significantly, p < 0.05, the strategy of the main effect is not significant, the interaction effect of significance is higher, p < 0.05, and refused to express inhibition compared group, refused to cognitive reappraisal group significantly larger, p < 0.05, exile groups after learning expression suppression strategy, the effect is better, but the difference is not obvious. Conclusion: under the social exclusion situation, automatic emotion regulation characteristics as follows: refused to induce emotional dissociation, after the implementation of cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation effect is good. Banish induce depression, emotion regulation effect after implementation of expression suppression is better; Compared to exile groups, refused to adjust the effect is better. Automatic regulating psychological mechanism for: exile will start/deny automation is to choose a particular way of emotion regulation, exile groups in this strategy is more inclined to reaction of perfusion, refused to set the automatic first focus strategy to regulate mood. Strategy and the effect of environmental factors can predict the regulation, policy factors mainly plays the intermediary effect.
关键词
【关键词】社会排斥;自动化情绪调节;特点研究;心理机制
KeyWord
【 key words 】 social exclusion; Automatic emotion regulation; Characteristics of research; Psychological mechanism
基金项目
页码 230-232
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

丁凡, 陈婷婷,阳前军,刘忠纯*. 社会排斥情境下自动化情绪调节的特点及心理机制的探讨 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2017; 44; (2). 230 - 232.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构