子宫切除术中不同麻醉方法的临床效果观察

Clinical observation of different anesthesia methods in uterine resection surgery

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20250444
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 9(9)
作者
作者单位

新疆维吾尔自治区维吾尔医医院(新疆维吾尔自治区第二人民医院) 新疆乌鲁木齐

摘要
目的 分析子宫切除术患者在手术过程中选用不同麻醉方法的临床效果。方法 对2024年3月-2025年3月本科接诊进行子宫切除术的患者(n=72)进行随机分组,对照和研究组各36人,对照组采取气管插管式全麻,研究组在此基础上行复合硬膜外麻醉。对比两组的术后麻醉恢复指标、不良反应情况。结果 研究组患者的术后麻醉恢复时间更快,不良反应情况更少,P<0.05。结论 科学地选择全麻复合硬膜外麻醉的方式,不仅能够提高手术的疗效,还能增强镇痛的效果,最大程度地保障患者的健康和舒适。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the clinical effects of different anesthesia methods used in patients undergoing hysterectomy during the surgical process. Methods A total of 72 patients (n=72) who underwent hysterectomy during undergraduate consultations from March 2024 to March 2025 were randomly divided into a control group and a study group, with 36 patients in each group. The control group received general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, while the study group received a combination of epidural anesthesia on this basis. Compare the postoperative anesthesia recovery indicators and adverse reactions between the two groups. Results The postoperative anesthesia recovery time of the study group patients was faster, with fewer adverse reactions, P<0.05. Conclusion Scientifically selecting the combination of general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia can not only improve the efficacy of surgery, but also enhance the analgesic effect, ensuring the health and comfort of patients to the greatest extent possible.
关键词
子宫切除术;气管插管式全麻醉;硬膜外麻醉;临床效果
KeyWord
Hysterectomy; Tracheal intubation anesthesia; Epidural anesthesia; Clinical efficacy
基金项目
页码 118-120
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

宋保华, 魏旋博, 夏依达·塔依尔, 亚里坤·亚森. 子宫切除术中不同麻醉方法的临床效果观察 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2025; 9; (9). 118 - 120.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构