优质护理对慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者自我护理能力的影响评估

Evaluation of the impact of high-quality nursing on self-care ability of chronic renal failure peritoneal dialysis patients

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20250630
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2025, 6(12)
作者
作者单位

东阳市中医院 浙江金华

摘要
目的 分析在慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者中应用优质护理的医学价值。方法 将2024年1月-2024年12月内就诊的70例慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者分35例对照组常规护理,35例观察组优质护理,对比两组护理前后的自护评分以及生活质量评分、对比两组患者护理期间产生的并发症概率。结果 护理前,两组护理效果无统计学意义,(P﹥0.05)。护理后,观察组ESCA自护意识评分更优、KDQ透析患者生活质量评分更优,观察组并发症概率低于对照组,(P﹤0.05)。结论 在慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者中应用优质护理能降低并发症概率,同时提高自护意识以及生活质量,让患者多方面受益。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the medical value of applying high-quality nursing in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Methods 70 patients with chronic renal failure undergoing peritoneal dialysis who received treatment between January 2024 and December 2024 were divided into a control group of 35 patients receiving routine care and an observation group receiving high-quality care. The self-care scores and quality of life scores before and after nursing were compared between the two groups, as well as the incidence of comorbidities during the nursing period. Results Before nursing, there was no statistically significant difference in the nursing effect between the two groups (P>0.05). After nursing, the observation group showed better self-care awareness scores in ESCA and better quality of life scores in KDQ dialysis patients. The probability of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The application of high-quality nursing in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing peritoneal dialysis can reduce the probability of complications, improve self-care awareness and quality of life, and benefit patients in multiple aspects.
关键词
优质护理;慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析;自我护理能力;自护意识;透析生活质量
KeyWord
High quality care; Chronic renal failure peritoneal dialysis; Self-care ability; Self-protection awareness; Dialysis quality of life
基金项目
页码 39-41
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

陈钰菲. 优质护理对慢性肾衰竭腹膜透析患者自我护理能力的影响评估 [J]. 当代护理. 2025; 6; (12). 39 - 41.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构