基于临床路径的教学模式提高小儿内科护理带教质量的价值研究

Research on the value of teaching model based on clinical pathway to improve the quality of pediatric nursing education

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20250547
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2025, 6(10)
作者
作者单位

石嘴山市第二人民医院 宁夏石嘴山

摘要
目的 探讨小儿内科护理带教采取基于临床路径的教学模式在提升带教质量中效果。方法 选取2023年6月至2024年12月在该院小儿内科实习的实习生22名,通过随机数字表法分为观察组与对照组,各11名实习生,其中观察组采取基于临床路径的教学模式,对照组则实施传统带教模式,对比实习生考核成绩、教学效果、教学质量、带教满意度。结果 观察组实习生考核成绩(综合成绩等)、教学效果(建立逻辑思维等)、教学质量(知识实用性等)高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组带教满意度90.91%高于对照组81.82%(P<0.05)。结论 基于临床路径的教学模式可有效提升小儿内科护理带教质量,效果较好。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of implementing a clinical pathway-based teaching model in pediatric nursing education for improving mentorship quality. Methods A total of 22 interns from the pediatric department who were interning at the hospital between June 2023 and December 2024 were randomly divided into an observation group (11 interns) and a control group (11 interns) using a random number table method. The observation group adopted the clinical pathway-based teaching model, while the control group followed traditional mentoring methods. Comparative analyses were conducted on internship assessment scores, teaching effectiveness, teaching quality, and mentorship satisfaction. Results Interns in the observation group demonstrated higher comprehensive assessment scores (P<0.05), stronger teaching effectiveness (e.g., logical thinking development), and better teaching quality (e.g., practical knowledge application) compared to the control group. Mentorship satisfaction rates were also significantly higher in the observation group (90.91%) than the control group (81.82%). Conclusion The clinical pathway-based teaching model effectively enhances the quality of pediatric nursing mentorship, yielding favorable outcomes.
关键词
小儿内科;带教满意度;基于临床路径的教学模式;护理带教质量
KeyWord
Pediatric internal medicine; Teaching satisfaction; Teaching mode based on clinical pathway; Nursing teaching quality
基金项目
页码 151-153
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

马荣, 潘茹. 基于临床路径的教学模式提高小儿内科护理带教质量的价值研究 [J]. 当代护理. 2025; 6; (10). 151 - 153.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构