正念冥想训练水平联合心理引导治疗对中重度抑郁症患者情绪加工和认知控制的影响

Effect of mindfulness meditation training combined with psychological guidance therapy on emotional processing and cognitive control in patients with moderate to severe depression

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2019, 46(3)
作者
作者单位

北京回龙观医院 ;

摘要
摘要:探讨正念冥想训练水平联合心理引导治疗对中重度抑郁症患者情绪加工及认知控制的影响。方法 选择2014年5月~2017年7月医院收治的86例中重度抑郁症患者作为研究对象,随机分为对照组与观察组各43例,对照组采用心理引导干预,观察组加用正念冥想训练,均持续干预8周,干预前后均采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的改善情况,并完成情绪词识别任务,比较两组干预前后情绪加工特点的变化,并采用简易智能精神状态检查量表(MMSE)、元认知问卷(MCQ-30)、自动思维问卷(ATQ)及认知偏差问卷(CBQ)调查患者认知控制状况。结果 干预前,两组HAMA表、HAMD表、MMSE表、MCQ-30表、ATQ表、CBQ表评分比较差异不具统计学意义(P>0.05),干预8周,两组HAMA表、HAMD表、MMSE表、MCQ-30表、ATQ表评分均降低,CBQ表抑郁-歪曲、抑郁-非歪曲、非抑郁-歪曲评分均降低,非抑郁-非歪曲评分上升(P<0.05),观察组干预8周HAMA表、HAMD表、MMSE表、MCQ-30表、ATQ表评分及CBQ表抑郁-歪曲、抑郁-非歪曲、非抑郁-歪曲评分低于对照组,CBQ表非抑郁-非歪曲评分高于对照组(P<0.05);干预前,两组正/负性词遗漏数、错判数、反应时比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),干预8周,两组正性词遗漏数、错判数减少,反应时缩短,负性词遗漏数减少,反应时缩短(P<0.05),观察组正性词遗漏数、错判数少于对照组,反应时短于对照组,负性词遗漏数少于对照组,反应时短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 正念冥想训练联合心理引导可改善中重度抑郁症患者负性情绪,减轻其情绪加工强化,纠正其认知偏差,提高患者认知控制水平。
Abstract
Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of mindfulness meditative training combined with psychological guidance therapy on emotional processing and cognitive control in patients with moderate to severe depression. Methods Eighty-six patients with moderate to severe depression who were admitted to the hospital from May 2014 to July 2017 were selected as study subjects. They were randomly divided into control group and observation group with 43 cases in each group. The control group were given psychological guidance intervention and on this basis, the observation group were given mindfulness meditative intervention. The intervention in both groups lasted for 8 weeks. The relief of anxiety and depression was evaluated with the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD). The emotional word recognition task was completed. Changes in emotional processing characteristics in both groups before and after the intervention were compared. The situation of cognitive control was investigated with the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), metacognitive questionnaire (MCQ-30), automatic thinking questionnaire (ATQ) and cognitive bias questionnaire (CBQ). Results There was no significant difference in scores of HAMA, HAMD, MMSE, MCQ-30, ATQ or CBQ between the two groups before intervention (P>0.05). Scores of HAMA, HAMD, MMSE, MCQ-30 and ATQ, scores of depression-distortion, depression-non-distortion and non-depression-distortion in CBQ were decreased, while non-depression-non-distortion scores were increased in both groups after 8 weeks of intervention (P<0.05). Scores of HAMA, HAMD, MMSE, MCQ-30 and ATQ, scores of depression-distortion, depression-non-distortion and non-depression-distortion in CBQ of the observation group after 8 weeks of intervention were lower than those of the control group, while non-depression-non-distortion scores were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of missed positive/negative words, number wrong judgements or response time between the two groups before the intervention (P>0.05). The number of missed positive and negative words and wrong judgments decreased, and the reaction time was shortened after 8 weeks of intervention (P<0.05). The number of missed positive and negative words and wrong judgments in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group, and the response time was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Mindfulness meditation training combined with psychological guidance can improve the negative emotions of patients with moderate to severe depression, relieve their emotional processing enhancement, correct their cognitive biases, and improve their cognitive control.
关键词
关键词:抑郁症;正念冥想训练;心理引导;情绪加工;认知功能
KeyWord
Key words: Depression; Mindfulness meditation training; Psychological guidance; Emotional processing; Cognitive function
基金项目
页码 470-473
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

李红娟*,王宁. 正念冥想训练水平联合心理引导治疗对中重度抑郁症患者情绪加工和认知控制的影响 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2019; 46; (3). 470 - 473.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构