双相情感障碍患者血浆lnc RNA BDNF-AS和GOMAFU的检测水平及意义

The Detection Levels and Significances of LNC RNA BDNF-AS and GOMAFU in Plasma of Patients with Bipolar Affective Disorder

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2020, 47(4)
作者
作者单位

盘锦辽油宝石花医院 ;

摘要
目的:检测双相情感障碍患者血浆lnc RNA BDNF-AS和GOMAFU水平,并探讨其临床意义。方法 选取2016年9月-2018年9月本院收治的112例双相情感障碍患者(躁狂组58例,抑郁组54例)、46例精神分裂症患者及45例健康体检者为研究对象,采用qRT-PCR测定受试者血浆lnc RNA BDNF-AS、脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)和GOMAFU表达水平,采用杨氏躁狂评定量表(YMRS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定双相情感障碍患者狂躁、抑郁的情况。采用Pearson对狂躁组和抑郁组患者血浆lnc RNA BDNF-AS、GOMAFU水平与症状进行相关性分析。结果 与对照组相比,精神分裂组、双相情感障碍组患者血浆BDNF-AS水平显著升高(P<0.05),BDNF与GOMAFU水平显著降低(P<0.05);与精神分裂组比较,双相情感障碍组患者血浆BDNF-AS水平显著升高(P<0.05),BDNF与GOMAFU水平显著降低(P<0.05);血浆BDNF-AS水平诊断双相情感障碍的曲线下面积为0.843,诊断分界点为6.75,敏感度为79.83%,特异度为79.76%,血浆GOMAFU水平诊断双相情感障碍的曲线下面积为0.736,诊断分界点为0.68,敏感度为95.56%,特异度为57.26%;与对照组相比,狂躁组和抑郁组患者血浆BDNF-AS水平显著升高(P<0.05),BDNF与GOMAFU水平显著降低(P<0.05),与抑郁组相比,狂躁组患者血浆BDNF-AS水平显著升高(P<0.05),BDNF与GOMAFU水平显著降低(P<0.05);Pearson相关分析显示,狂躁组患者血浆BDNF-AS、GOMAFU水平与YMRS评分无明显相关性(P>0.05),抑郁组患者血浆BDNF-AS、GOMAFU水平与HAMD评分无明显相关性(P>0.05)。结论 双相情感障碍患者血浆lnc RNA BDNF-AS水平上调,GOMAFU水平下调,二者可能作为临床诊断双相情感障碍疾病的潜在参考指标。
Abstract
Objective: To detect the levels of LNC RNA BDNF-AS and GOMAFU in plasma of patients with bipolar affective disorder and to explore their clinical significances. Methods From September 2016 to September 2018, 112 patients with bipolar affective disorder (58 in manic group, 54 in depression group), 46 patients with schizophrenia, and 45 healthy physical examiners were selected as subjects, the levels of plasma LNC RNA, BDNF-AS, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and GOMAFU were measured by qRT-PCR, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) were used to assess the mania and depression of patients with bipolar affective disorder. Pearson was used to analyze the correlations between levels of plasma LNC RNA, BDNF-AS, GOMAFU with symptoms in manic and depressive patients. Results Compared with the control group, the level of plasma BDNF-AS in schizophrenia group and bipolar affective disorder group increased significantly (P < 0.05), while the levels of BDNF and GOMAFU decreased significantly (P < 0.05); compared with schizophrenia group, the level of plasma BDNF-AS in bipolar affective disorder group increased significantly (P < 0.05), while the levels of plasma BDNF and GOMAFU were significantly decreased (P < 0.05); the area under the curve of plasma BDNF-AS level in the diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder was 0.843, the diagnostic threshold was 6.75, the sensitivity was 79.83%, and the specificity was 79.76%, the area under the curve of plasma GOMAFU level in the diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder was 0.736, the diagnostic threshold was 0.68, the sensitivity was 95.56%, and the specificity was 57.26%; compared with the control group, the level of plasma BDNF-AS in manic group and depression group increased significantly (P < 0.05), and the levels of BDNF and GOMAFU decreased significantly (P < 0.05), compared with depression group, the level of plasma BDNF-AS in manic group increased significantly (P < 0.05), while the levels of BDNF and GOMAFU decreased significantly (P < 0.05); Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between plasma BDNF-AS, GOMAFU levels with YMRS score in manic patients (P > 0.05), and there was no significant correlation between plasma BDNF-AS, GOMAFU levels with HAMD score in depressive patients (P > 0.05). Conclusion The level of plasma LNC RNA BDNF-AS in patients with bipolar affective disorder is up-regulated, GOMAFU level is down-regulated, both of them may serve as potential indicators for clinical diagnosis of bipolar affective disorder.
关键词
双相情感障碍;BDNF-AS;GOMAFU;狂躁;抑郁
KeyWord
Bipolar affective disorder; BDNF-AS; GOMAFU; Mania; Depression
基金项目
页码 677-681
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

栾明友*,王德军,龚越鹏,苗贞勇. 双相情感障碍患者血浆lnc RNA BDNF-AS和GOMAFU的检测水平及意义 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2020; 47; (4). 677 - 681.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构