阿戈美拉汀联合认知行为干预对缺血性脑卒中后抑郁患者再发脑卒中的影响分析

Effect of agomelatine combined with cognitive behavioral intervention on recurrent stroke in patients with post-ischemic stroke

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2020, 47(1)
作者
作者单位

洛阳市第五人民医院精神科 ;

摘要
探究对缺血性脑卒中后抑郁患者应用阿戈美拉汀联合认知行为干预的临床价值以及对其病情产生的影响。方法:病例选取时间为2018年10月至2019年4月,对本医院收治的60例缺血性脑卒中后抑郁患者开展项目研究,采用抽签法将其平均分成2组(试验组与参照组),其中参照组运用艾司西酞普兰联合认知行为干预,试验组运用阿戈美拉汀联合认知行为干预。对其治疗前后负面情绪改善情况、再发脑卒中率、神经系统毒性反应发生率、胃肠道反应发生率进行统计分析。结果:试验组出院3个月再发脑卒中发生1例,参照组发生4例,数据对比2值=1.9636,p值=0.1611,试验组出院6个月再发脑卒中2例,参照组发生8例,数据对比2值=4.3200,p值=0.0376,试验组出院3个月1(3.33%)例低于参照组4(13.33%)例,但组间对比无明显差异P>0.05,试验组出院6个月2(6.67%)例低于参照组8(26.67%)例,数据对比存在显著性差异P<0.05;试验组神经系统毒性反应总发生率1(3.33%)例低于参照组7(23.33%)例,数据对比2值=5.1923,p值=0.0226,组间对比统计学意义存在P<0.05;试验组与参照组负面情绪治疗前对比无明显差异P>0.05,治疗后试验组SDS与SAS评分均低于参照组,数据对比存在统计学意义P<0.05;试验组胃肠道反应发生率1(3.33%)例低于参照组6(20.00%)例,数据对比2值=4.0431,p值=0.0443,组间对比存在明显差异P<0.05。结论:对于缺血性脑卒中后抑郁患者,给予采取阿戈美拉汀联合认知行为干预,可有效降低患者再发脑卒中率,并且对其神经系统毒性反应以及胃肠道反应也具有重要作用,可有效缓解患者临床负面情绪,该种治疗方式可广泛推广实施运用,从而全面促进其预后康复,可将该种联合治疗方案广泛推广实施运用。
Abstract
To investigate the clinical value of the combination of agomelatine and cognitive behavioral intervention in patients with post-ischemic stroke and its impact on the condition. METHODS: The case selection time was from October 2018 to April 2019. The project was studied in 60 patients with post-ischemic post-stroke depression admitted to the hospital. They were divided into two groups by means of lottery (test group and reference group). The reference group used escitalopram combined with cognitive behavioral intervention, and the experimental group used agomelatine in combination with cognitive behavioral intervention. The improvement of negative emotions before and after treatment, the rate of recurrent stroke, the incidence of neurotoxicity, and the incidence of gastrointestinal reactions. RESULTS: One patient in the trial group was discharged in 3 months, and 4 patients in the reference group. The data were compared with 2 values ​​= 1.9636, p = 0.1611. The experimental group was discharged from the hospital for 6 months and 2 patients. The reference group occurred in 8 cases. 4.3200, p value = 0.0376, the test group discharged 3 months 1 (3.33%) was lower than the reference group 4 (13.33%), but there was no significant difference between the groups P> 0.05, the test group was discharged for 6 months 2 (6.67) %) was lower than the reference group 8 (26.67%), and there was a significant difference in data comparison P<0.05; the total incidence of neurotoxicity in the test group was 1 (3.33%), which was lower than that in the reference group 7 (23.33%). Data comparison 2 = 5.1923, p = 0.0126, there was statistical significance of P < 0.05 between the groups; there was no significant difference between the experimental group and the reference group before the negative emotional treatment P> 0.05, the SDS and SAS scores of the experimental group were low after treatment In the reference group, the data were statistically significant (P<0.05); the incidence of gastrointestinal reactions in the experimental group was 1 (3.33%), which was lower than that in the reference group (20.00%). The data was compared with 2 = 4.0431, p = 0.0443. There was a significant difference between the groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: For patients with post-ischemic stroke, the combination of agomelatine and cognitive behavioral intervention can effectively reduce the rate of recurrent stroke and is also important for its neurotoxicity and gastrointestinal reactions. The effect can effectively alleviate the patients clinical negative emotions. This kind of treatment can be widely promoted and applied, so as to comprehensively promote the prognosis and rehabilitation. The combined treatment plan can be widely applied and applied.
关键词
缺血性脑卒中;抑郁症状;临床效果;认知行为;阿戈美拉汀
KeyWord
ischemic stroke; depressive symptoms; clinical effects; cognitive behavior; agomelatine
基金项目
页码 120-122
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

王俊仙*. 阿戈美拉汀联合认知行为干预对缺血性脑卒中后抑郁患者再发脑卒中的影响分析 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2020; 47; (1). 120 - 122.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构