心理护理干预对消化性溃疡患者不良情绪的影响观察

Observation on the effect of psychological nursing intervention on adverse emotions of patients with peptic ulcer

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2019, 46(6)
作者
作者单位

新乡医学院第一附属医院消化内科 ;

摘要
摘要:[目的]探讨观察心理护理干预对消化性溃疡患者不良情绪的影响。[方法]以2017年2月--2019年2月为时间段,选择我院收治的消化性溃疡患者共200例,随机分成2组,每组100例。对照组患者给予常规护理干预,研究组患者配合心理护理干预。采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)以及抑郁自评量表(SDS)评价患者的心理状态;评价两组患者临床疗效,经半年随访统计复发情况;采用SF-36量表,评价患者生活质量;调查患者对本次护理服务的满意度。[结果]干预前,比较SAS评分与SDS评分,两组并无统计学差异(P>0.05),干预后,二者有统计学差异(P<0.05);研究组总有效率与对照组比较无统计学差异(98% vs 96%,χ2=0.687,P=0.407);研究组3例复发,对照组11例复发,研究组低于对照组,有统计学差异(χ2=4.915,P=0.026);生活质量评价发现,研究组各指标评分都高于对照组,有统计学差异(P<0.05);研究组护理满意度比对照组高(98% vs 89%),有统计学差异(χ2=6.663,P=0.009)。[结论]消化性溃疡患者护理中,配合心理护理干预,可缓解负面情绪,保证临床疗效,降低复发率,改善病人的生活质量,且患者满意度高。
Abstract
Abstract: [objective] to explore the effect of psychological nursing intervention on adverse emotions of peptic ulcer patients. [Method] From February 2017 to February 2019, 200 patients with peptic ulcer in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 100 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given routine nursing intervention, while patients in the study group were given psychological nursing intervention. Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used to evaluate the psychological status of the patients; the clinical efficacy of the two groups was evaluated, and the recurrence was counted after half a year follow-up; the quality of life of the patients was evaluated by SF-36 scale; and the satisfaction of the patients with the nursing service was investigated. [Result] Before intervention, there was no significant difference in SAS score and SDS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). After intervention, there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in total effective rate between the study group and the control group (98% vs 96%, 2 = 0.687, P = 0.407). There were 3 recurrences in the study group, 11 recurrences in the control group, and the study group was low. In the control group, there were statistical differences (2 = 4.915, P = 0.026); the quality of life evaluation found that the study group were higher than the control group, there were statistical differences (P < 0.05); nursing satisfaction in the study group was higher than that in the control group (98% vs 89%), there were statistical differences (2 = 6.663, P = 0.009). [Conclusion] In the nursing of peptic ulcer patients, psychological nursing intervention can alleviate negative emotions, ensure clinical efficacy, reduce recurrence rate, improve patientsquality of life, and patients satisfaction is high.
基金项目
页码 1140-1143
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

徐泽静*. 心理护理干预对消化性溃疡患者不良情绪的影响观察 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2019; 46; (6). 1140 - 1143.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构