基于CiteSpace的外语课程思政研究可视化分析-现代社会科学研究-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

基于CiteSpace的外语课程思政研究可视化分析

Visual analysis of ideological-political studies in foreign language courses based on Citespace

ES评分 0 浏览量：69 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.ssr.20250106
刊名	现代社会科学研究 Modern Social Science Research
年，卷(期)	2025, 5(3)
作者	刘少慧,赵翔宇*,
作者单位	吉林外国语大学吉林长春
摘要	本文基于CiteSpace可视化分析，探讨了课程思政在外语教学中的融入情况。通过分析2019-2025期间发表的相关文献，揭示了课程思政与外语教学融合的研究趋势、热点及挑战。研究发现，课程思政在外语教学中的融入呈增长态势，且“课程思政”“思政元素”“大学英语”“外语教学”“思政教育”“英语教学”“外语课程”“高职英语”“中国文化”等词语出现频率极高。在对文献进行计量和可视化分析的背景下，本文提出了加强教师思政素养培训、开发融合型教学资源等策略，以促进课程思政与外语教学的深度融合。
Abstract	Based on CiteSpace visual analysis, this paper discusses the integration of curriculum ideology and politics in foreign language teaching. By analyzing the relevant literature published during 2019-2025, the research trend, hot spots and challenges of the integration of curriculum ideology and politics and foreign language teaching are revealed. It is found that the integration of curriculum ideology and politics in foreign language teaching is closer, and words such as “Curriculum ideology and politics”, “College English”, “Foreign language teaching”, “Ideological and political education”, “English teaching”, “Foreign language curriculum”, “Vocational English”, and “Chinese culture” appear very frequently. In the context of measurement and visual analysis of the literature, this thesis puts forward the strategies of strengthening teachers’ ideological and political literacy training and developing integrated teaching resources, so as to promote the deep integration of curriculum ideology and politics and foreign language teaching.
关键词	课程思政；外语；教学；可视化分析
KeyWord	Curriculum ideology and politics; Teaching; Visual analysis
基金项目
页码	97-101

参考文献
相关文献

[1] 蔡基刚. 课程思政与立德树人内涵探索—以大学英语课程为例. 外语研究,38(03):52-57,2021.
[2] 尚娜. 人教版初中英语教材中思政元素及其教学实施的调查研究. 青岛大学,2023.
[3] 宫晓琪. 课程思政融入初中英语教学现状的调查研究. 天津师范大学,2023.
[4] Kerry, K. Citizenship education and the modern state. Washington, D.C.: The Falmer Press,1997.
[5] Greenfield, D. Toward a theory of school administration: The centrality of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31, 61-85,2015.
[6] Tyler, W. Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1949.
[7] Feng, W. D. Infusing moral education into English language teaching: an ontogenetic analysis of social values in EFL textbooks in Hong Kong. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(4), 458-473, 2019.
[8] Byram, M. Foreign language education as political and moral education—an essay. Language Learning Journal, 26(1), 43-47, 2002.
[9] Cam, P. A philosophical approach to moral education. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, 3(1), 2016.
[10] LeBlanc, R. J. Interactional order, moral order: Classroom interactions and the institutional production of identities. Linguistics and Education, 40, 27-37, 2017.
[11] Asif, T., Guangming, O., Haider, M. A., Colomer, J., Kayani, S., & Amin, N. U. Moral education for sustainable development: Comparison of university teachers’ perceptions in China and Pakistan. Sustainability, 12(7), 3014, 2020.
[12] 王学俭, 石岩. 新时代课程思政的内涵、特点、难点及应对策略. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),41(02): 50-58,2020.
[13] 谭可昕. 课程思政在高中英语教学中的应用. 大连:辽宁师范大学,2021.
[14] 李亚轩. 高中英语课程思政建设路径探讨—以xx高中为例. 山东师范大学,2021.
[15] 汪瑞林. 中小学“课程思政”的功能及其实现方式. 课程.教材.教法, 40(11): 77-83,2020.

引用本文

刘少慧,赵翔宇*. 基于CiteSpace的外语课程思政研究可视化分析 [J]. 现代社会科学研究. 2025; 5; (3). 97 - 101.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构