基于模糊层次分析法的历史教学评价-国际教育学-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

基于模糊层次分析法的历史教学评价

The Fuzzy analytic hierarchy Evaluation System in History Teaching

ES评分 0 浏览量：105 下载量：0

DOI	10.12208/j.ije.20250088
刊名	国际教育学 International Journal of Education
年，卷(期)	2025, 7(3)
作者	张榕*,
作者单位	深圳中学初中部广东深圳
摘要	历史教学评价，是指历史教师根据课堂标准，运用科学方法对历史教学过程、教学效果以及影响教学的各种因素进行价值判断的工程，它是历史教学环节的重要主持部分。在本文中，我们提出了一种基于模糊层次分析法的历史教学评价框架系统。具体而言，在确定因素和子因素后，建立历史教学指标体系。在指标体系中，采用模糊层次分析法估计因子和子因子的权重，在历史教学的群体决策中采用模糊层次分析法可以促进决策者达成共识。在该历史教学系统评价的基础上，采用模糊综合评价法对历史教学教学效果进行评价。最后实验结果验证了该评价结果更加科学、准确、客观，进一步该工作可作为历史教学管理者提高历史教育质量水平的辅助工具。
Abstract	Evaluation of history teaching is a fundamental part of history teaching, which refers to the project in which history teachers use scientific methods to judge the value of the history teaching process, the effectiveness of the teaching, and various factors affecting teaching according to classroom standards. This paper proposes a framework system for history teaching evaluation based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Specifically, a history teaching index system is established after determining the factors and subfactors. In the index system, the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process estimates the weights of factors and subfactors, and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in group decision-making in history teaching can promote decision-makers to reach a consensus. Based on systematic evaluation of history teaching, we make use of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the teaching effect of history teaching. The final experimental results verify that the evaluation results are more scientific, accurate, and objective, and further, this work can be used as an auxiliary tool for history teaching managers to improve the quality of history education.
关键词	模糊评价；历史教学评价；层次；教学体系
KeyWord	Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process; History teaching evaluation;Junior high school education; Factors
基金项目
页码	19-23

参考文献
相关文献

[1] Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Springer.
[2] 曹倩倩, & 白洪伟. (2023). 基于层次分析法的高等数学课程成绩评价体系探究. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 6(15), 6.
[3] 魏培文, 朱珂, 叶海智, 张潍杰, 张利远, & 闫娟. (2024). 基于 BP 神经网络的高校教师精准教学能力评价模型构建. 河南师范大学学报 (自然科学版), 52(5).
[4] 杨欣. (2022). 教育评价改革的算法追问. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), 40(1), 19.
[5] Berk, R. A., & Theall, M. (2006). Thirteen strategies to measure college teaching: A consumer's guide to rating scale construction, assessment, and decision making for faculty, administrators, and clinicians. Stylus Publishing, LLC..
[6] Bangian, A. H., Ataei, M., Sayadi, A., & Gholinejad, A. (2011). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy processing to define optimum post mining land use for pit area to clarify reclamation costs. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, 27, 145-168.
[7] 吴耀男, 林雷, 任新温, 王龙庭, 刘志慧, & 刘增凯. (2021). 一种基于逻辑结构数的改进型 FMEA 方法. 中国安全科学学报, 31(10), 97.
[8] Moayeri, M., Shahvarani, A., Behzadi, M. H., & Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, F. (2015). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for math teachers selection. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(13), 1.
[9] Shahin, A., Barati, A., & Geramian, A. (2017). Determining the critical factors of radical innovation using an integrated model of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy Kano with a case study in Mobarakeh steel company. Engineering Management Journal, 29(2), 74-86.
[10] Moayeri, M., Shahvarani, A., Behzadi, M. H., & Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi, F. (2015). Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for math teachers selection. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(13), 1.

引用本文

张榕*. 基于模糊层次分析法的历史教学评价 [J]. 国际教育学. 2025; 7; (3). 19 - 23.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构