以学生为中心:内涵、逻辑及实践路径

Student-centered: connotation, logic and practical path

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ije.20250226
刊名
International Journal of Education
年,卷(期) 2025, 7(6)
作者
作者单位

吉林外国语大学 吉林长春

摘要
全球教育正处于变革中,对人才要求有所提升,而传统教学模式滞后,无法满足学生发展的需要,以学生为中心的教育理念应运而生并渐成主流,对学生发展和教育质量提升等方面具有深远意义。本文通过文献综述和理论分析的方法,深入剖析了“以学生为中心”的内涵、逻辑及实践路径。本文系统梳理以学生为中心的教育理念的内涵,回顾其起源和发展脉络,并深度挖掘其建构主义、人本主义等理论基础。以学生为中心的教育理念有助于促进学生知识建构、个性化学习,并提升综合素质,同时提高教学效果和教育公平性,具有逻辑必然性与实践导向性。结合当前教育现状,本文倡导构建多元教学策略、打造立体评价体系并重塑教师角色的实践路径策略,以此来促进学生全方面的发展,从而为教育质量的提高提供有益的参考与借鉴。
Abstract
Global education is in the process of change, and the demand for talents has improved. However, the traditional teaching mode lags behind and cant meet the needs of students development. The student-centered education concept has emerged and gradually become the mainstream, which has far-reaching significance for students development and the improvement of education quality. Through literature review and theoretical analysis, this paper deeply analyzes the connotation, logic and practical path of “student-centered”. This paper systematically combs the connotation of the student-centered educational concept, reviews its origin and development, and deeply digs into its theoretical basis such as constructivism and humanism. The student-centered educational concept is conducive to promoting students knowledge construction, personalized learning, improving their comprehensive quality, and improving the teaching effect and educational fairness, which is logical and practical. Combined with the current education situation, this paper advocates the practical path strategy of constructing multiple teaching strategies, creating a three-dimensional evaluation system and reshaping the role of teachers, so as to promote the development of students in all aspects, thus providing useful reference for improving the quality of education.
关键词
以学生为中心;实践路径;逻辑;内涵
KeyWord
Student-centered; Practical path; Logic; Connotation
基金项目
页码 73-76
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

曲颖*,步晓燕. 以学生为中心:内涵、逻辑及实践路径 [J]. 国际教育学. 2025; 7; (6). 73 - 76.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构