经外周静脉留置针输注甘露醇后对血管影响的现状分析

Analysis of the current situation of vascular effects after infusion of mannitol via peripheral venous indwelling needle

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijnr.20250006
刊名
International Journal of Nursing Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 7(1)
作者
作者单位

1中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院老年医学科 云南昆明;
2昆明医科大学 云南昆明;
3中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院骨科 云南昆明;
4中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院神经内科 云南昆明;
5中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九二〇医院神经外科 云南昆明

摘要
目的 探讨经外周静脉留置针输注甘露醇后对血管影响的现状分析,了解临床中静脉输注甘露醇注射液选择输液工具及管理现状。方法 选取2024年1月-2024年4月期间某医院静脉输注甘露醇注射液的神经外科58人、神经内科42人、骨科90人,共190人进行调查统计分析。结果 采用钢针法输液的患者有49例表示疼痛,疼痛发生率为34.51%,采用经外周静脉留置针法输液的患者有226例表示疼痛,疼痛发生率为42.24%,外周静脉留置针法输液的疼痛发生率高于钢针法输液,差异有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论 因此,在输液工具的选择上,经外周静脉留置针并不是明智的选择,建议提高输液工具等级。
Abstract
Objective Exploring the current situation of the impact of peripheral intravenous infusion of mannitol on blood vessels, and understanding the selection of infusion tools and management status of intravenous infusion of mannitol injection in clinical practice. Methods A total of 190 individuals were selected for investigation and statistical analysis, including 58 neurosurgical personnel, 42 neurology personnel, and 90 orthopedic personnel who received intravenous infusion of mannitol injection in a hospital from January 2024 to April 2024. Results 49 patients who received steel needle infusion reported pain, with a pain incidence rate of 34.51%. 226 patients who received peripheral vein indwelling needle infusion reported pain, with a pain incidence rate of 42.24%. The pain incidence rate of peripheral vein indwelling needle infusion was higher than that of steel needle infusion, with statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Therefore, in the selection of infusion tools, indwelling needles through peripheral veins are not a wise choice, and it is recommended to improve the level of infusion tools.
关键词
甘露醇注射液;静脉输注;浅静脉留置针;输液工具
KeyWord
Mannitol injection solution; Intravenous infusion; Shallow vein indwelling needle; Infusion tools
基金项目
页码 17-19
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

李红,卢悦,王俊,杜棣,王晓岩,张社敏,梁源*. 经外周静脉留置针输注甘露醇后对血管影响的现状分析 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2025; 7; (1). 17 - 19.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构