循证护理对冠周炎拔牙患者术后心理状况、并发症及护理满意度的影响

The impact of evidence-based nursing on postoperative psychological status, complications, and nursing satisfaction of patients with periodontitis undergoing tooth extraction

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijnr.20250091
刊名
International Journal of Nursing Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 7(2)
作者
作者单位

上海市口腔医院 上海

摘要
目的 分析冠周炎拔牙患者接受循证护理体现的临床效果。方法 选取本院进行拔牙术治疗的90例冠周炎患者,时段2023年4月~2024年4月。根据入院号奇偶数划分2组各45例,对照组予以常规护理,观察组予以循证护理。根据心理状况、并发症、护理满意度评价2组干预效果。结果 观察组干预后医院焦虑抑郁评分量表(HADS)与对照组比较显著减少(P<0.05)。观察组并发症总发生率与对照组比较降低(P<0.05)。观察组护理总满意率与对照组比较提高(P<0.05)。结论 冠周炎拔牙患者接受循证护理能改善心理状况,降低术后并发症风险,提高护理满意度。
Abstract
Objective To analyze the clinical effects of evidence-based nursing in patients with tooth extraction due to periodontitis. Methods Ninety patients with periodontitis who underwent tooth extraction treatment in our hospital were selected for the period from April 2023 to April 2024. According to the odd and even admission numbers, there were two groups of 45 cases each. The control group received routine care, while the observation group received evidence-based care. Evaluate the intervention effects of two groups based on psychological status, complications, and nursing satisfaction. Results showed that after intervention, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in the observation group was significantly reduced compared to the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The overall satisfaction rate of nursing in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Evidence based nursing can improve the psychological condition, reduce the risk of postoperative complications, and increase nursing satisfaction in patients with periodontitis undergoing tooth extraction.
关键词
冠周炎;拔牙;循证护理;心理状况;并发症
KeyWord
Pericoronitis; Tooth extraction; Evidence-based nursing; Psychological status; Complications
基金项目
页码 110-112
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

俞宙*. 循证护理对冠周炎拔牙患者术后心理状况、并发症及护理满意度的影响 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2025; 7; (2). 110 - 112.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构