临床护士灵性及灵性照护认知的现状调查

A survey on the spirituality of clinical nurses and their perception of spiritual care

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijnr.20250121
刊名
International Journal of Nursing Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 7(3)
作者
作者单位

海军军医大学第三附属医院肿瘤科 上海

摘要
目的 探讨临床护理人员灵性与灵性照护认知现状,并分析其影响因素。方法 采用一般资料调查表与中文版灵性与灵性照护测评量表对临床护理人员进行问卷调查。结果 护理人员灵性与灵性照护认知水平得分为(42.95±5.92)分,单因素分析结果表明,文化程度、宗教信仰、子女情况、童年成长环境、职位、对灵性和灵性照护是否了解、是否参加过灵性照护相关培训、是否从事过灵性照护相关工作对临床护理人员灵性与灵性照护均有一定影响(P<0.05)。多元线性回归结果显示,文化程度、宗教信仰、是否参加过灵性照护相关培训是影响护理人员灵性和灵性照护的主要因素(P<0.05)。结论 护理人员灵性及灵性照护水平有待提高,护理管理者应采取相应的措施对临床护理人员灵性与灵性照护相关知识进行教育与培训,以提高其灵性照护的能力。
Abstract
Objective To explore the status of the cognition of spirituality and spiritual care among clinical nurses, and analyze the influencing factors. Methods General information questionnaire and Chinese version of spirituality and spiritual care scale were used to investigate the clinical nursing staff. Results The score of nurses spiritual and spiritual care cognition was (42.95 ± 5.92), education level, religious belief, childrens situation, childhood growth environment, position, understanding of spirituality and spiritual care, whether they have participated in spiritual care related training, whether they have engaged in spiritual care related work have certain impact on clinical nursing staffs spirituality and spiritual care (P < 0.05). The results of multiple linear regression showed that education level, religious belief and whether they had participated in spiritual care related training were the main factors affecting the spirituality and spiritual care of nursing staff (P < 0.05). Conclusion The level of spirituality and spiritual care of nursing staff needs to be improved. Nursing managers should take corresponding measures to educate and train clinical nursing staff about spirituality and spiritual care, so as to improve their ability of spiritual care.
关键词
护理人员;灵性与灵性照护;调查
KeyWord
Nursing staff; Spiritual and Spiritual care; Investigation
基金项目
页码 25-31
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

崔莹莹,胡守紫*. 临床护士灵性及灵性照护认知的现状调查 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2025; 7; (3). 25 - 31.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构