规范化护理干预对行CT/MRI检查患者护理质量的影响

The impact of standardized nursing interventions on the quality of nursing care for patients undergoing CT/MRI examinations

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijnr.20250144
刊名
International Journal of Nursing Research
年,卷(期) 2025, 7(3)
作者
作者单位

河南大学淮河医院 河南开封

摘要
目的 探究CT/MRI检查患者接受规范化护理干预对护理质量的影响。方法 选取本院影像科接受CT/MRI检查患者共160例患者(时段2023年6月~2024年6月),将其划分为2个组别分别80例。对照组检查期间提供常规护理,观察组检查期间实施规范化护理。根据体征指标、护理质量评分、负性情绪进行全面评价。结果 观察组干预后收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、心率(HR)相比对照组更低(P<0.05)。观察组干预后焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)相比对照组更低(P<0.05)。观察组护理质量评分相比对照组更高(P<0.05)。结论 CT/MRI检查患者接受规范化护理干预能减轻负性情绪,保持相关体征平稳,提高护理质量。
Abstract
Objective To explore the impact of standardized nursing interventions on nursing quality in patients undergoing CT/MRI examination. Methods A total of 160 patients who underwent CT/MRI examination in the imaging department of our hospital (period from June 2023 to June 2024) were selected and divided into two groups of 80 patients each. The control group received routine care during the examination period, while the observation group received standardized care during the examination period. Conduct a comprehensive evaluation based on physical indicators, nursing quality scores, and negative emotions. Results After intervention, the observation group had lower systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and heart rate (HR) compared to the control group (P<0.05). The Self Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self Rating Depression Scale (SDS) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group after intervention (P<0.05). The nursing quality score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion CT/MRI examination patients receiving standardized nursing interventions can alleviate negative emotions, maintain stable related physical signs, and improve nursing quality.
关键词
CT/MRI检查;规范化护理干预;护理质量
KeyWord
CT/MRI examination; Standardized nursing interventions; Nursing quality
基金项目
页码 103-105
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

秦祎*,侯彦梅. 规范化护理干预对行CT/MRI检查患者护理质量的影响 [J]. 国际护理学研究. 2025; 7; (3). 103 - 105.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构