Creatine Supplementation: More Is Likely Better for Brain Bioenergetics, Health and Function

Creatine Supplementation: More Is Likely Better for Brain Bioenergetics, Health and Function

ES评分 0

DOI 10.20900/jpbs.20250006
刊名
JPBS
年,卷(期) 2025, 10(4)
作者
作者单位

Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada ;
Faculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada ;

摘要
Creatine monohydrate (CrM) is one of the most well-researched and effective ergogenic supplements. Given the constant energy supply required by the brain, there has been a paradigm shift from CrM for skeletal muscle benefits to potentially improving brain bioenergetics, health and function. Accumulating research indicates that CrM is capable of increasing brain creatine stores which may help explain improvements in cognitive functioning particularly during times of metabolic stress (i.e., sleep deprivation, hypoxia, mental fatigue, and traumatic brain injury [TBI]). Due to the attenuation of creatine transport kinetics and the blood-brain barrier (BBB), speculation exists that higher doses of CrM are needed to optimize brain creatine levels. However, optimal CrM doses are currently unknown. Beyond these key variables, strategies such as glycocyamine supplementation (natural precursor to creatine), cyclocreatine supplementation (creatine analog), intranasal administration, and creatine transporter (CT1) modulation appear promising for increasing total and regional brain creatine levels which warrants further investigation. Collectively, higher doses of CrM have shown beneficial effects for older adults with Alzheimer’s Disease, young adults following acute periods of sleep deprivation, children suffering from TBI, and depression. The purpose of this narrative review is to (1) provide a comprehensive overview and rationale for the requirement of higher doses of CrM for brain bioenergetics, health and function and (2) identify areas of future research to further the field.
Abstract
Creatine monohydrate (CrM) is one of the most well-researched and effective ergogenic supplements. Given the constant energy supply required by the brain, there has been a paradigm shift from CrM for skeletal muscle benefits to potentially improving brain bioenergetics, health and function. Accumulating research indicates that CrM is capable of increasing brain creatine stores which may help explain improvements in cognitive functioning particularly during times of metabolic stress (i.e., sleep deprivation, hypoxia, mental fatigue, and traumatic brain injury [TBI]). Due to the attenuation of creatine transport kinetics and the blood-brain barrier (BBB), speculation exists that higher doses of CrM are needed to optimize brain creatine levels. However, optimal CrM doses are currently unknown. Beyond these key variables, strategies such as glycocyamine supplementation (natural precursor to creatine), cyclocreatine supplementation (creatine analog), intranasal administration, and creatine transporter (CT1) modulation appear promising for increasing total and regional brain creatine levels which warrants further investigation. Collectively, higher doses of CrM have shown beneficial effects for older adults with Alzheimer’s Disease, young adults following acute periods of sleep deprivation, children suffering from TBI, and depression. The purpose of this narrative review is to (1) provide a comprehensive overview and rationale for the requirement of higher doses of CrM for brain bioenergetics, health and function and (2) identify areas of future research to further the field.
关键词
creatine; supplementation; brain bioenergetics; health; Alzheimer’s disease; sleep deprivation; traumatic brain injury; depression
KeyWord
creatine; supplementation; brain bioenergetics; health; Alzheimer’s disease; sleep deprivation; traumatic brain injury; depression
基金项目
页码 -
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

Nicholas Fabiano*,Darren Candow. Creatine Supplementation: More Is Likely Better for Brain Bioenergetics, Health and Function [J]. Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science. 2025; 10; (4). - .

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构