微波消解-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法定量检测牛乳中糠氨酸-食品安全质量检测学报-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

微波消解-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法定量检测牛乳中糠氨酸

Quantitative detection of furosine in milk by microwave hydrolysis-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

ES评分 0 浏览量：223 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20250421002
刊名	食品安全质量检测学报 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
年，卷(期)	2025, 16(13)
作者	姚桂红, 梁超, 姚美伊, 邢仕歌, 韩旭杰, 吴明鸽,凌云, 许秀丽,
作者单位	中国质量检验检测科学研究院食品安全研究所; 国家市场监督管理总局重点实验室 (食品质量与安全); 国家乳业技术创新中心
摘要	目的建立微波消解-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, UPLC-MS/MS)检测牛乳中糠氨酸含量的方法。方法运用单因素试验及响应面法优化微波水解最佳条件。在最佳水解条件下获得的水解液过滤定容后, 滤液经6.0 g/L的乙酸铵溶液稀释10倍后进样分析, 以0.1%甲酸水溶液和甲醇溶液为流动相进行梯度洗脱, T3液相色谱柱(100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm)进行分离, 在电喷雾离子源正离子模式(the positive ion mode of electrospray ion source, ESI+)下, 选用多反应监测(multiple reaction monitoring, MRM)模式检测, 外标法定量。结果牛乳中糠氨酸的最佳微波水解条件为水解温度160 ℃、盐酸浓度8.1 mol/L、水解时间52 min, 影响因素主次顺序为盐酸浓度>水解时间>水解温度。牛乳基质中糠氨酸在0.005~0.500 μg/mL质量浓度范围内呈良好的线性关系, 相关系数(r)为0.9958。定量限(limit of quantitation, LOQ)和检出限(limit of detection, LOD)分别为0.20 μg/mL和0.07 μg/mL。平均加标回收率为89.09%~97.33%, 相对标准偏差(relative standard deviations, RSDs)为3.37%~7.02% (n=6)。结论该方法高效、准确, 与传统的水解方法(12~24 h)相比, 微波水解将水解时间缩短至52 min, 且与NY/T 939—2016《巴氏杀菌乳和UHT灭菌乳中复原乳的鉴定》中常规水解方法对比, 检测结果无显著差异(P>0.05), 可为乳制品质量控制及热处理工艺评估提供技术参考。
Abstract	Objective To establish a method for the detection of furosine in milk by microwave hydrolysis-ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Methods The optimal conditions for microwave hydrolysis were optimized by single factor experiments and response surface methodology. The hydrolysis solution obtained under the optimal hydrolysis conditions was filtered to a constant volume. The hydrolysate was diluted 10-fold with 6.0 g/L ammonium acetate solution and then analyzed. Gradient elution was performed with 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and methanol solution as mobile phases, and the separation was carried out on a T3 liquid chromatography column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm). Under the positive ion mode of electrospray ion source (ESI+), multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was selected for detection and external standard method was used for quantification. Results The optimal microwave hydrolysis conditions for furosine in milk were hydrolysis temperature of 160 ℃, hydrochloric acid concentration of 8.1 mol/L, and hydrolysis time of 52 min. The primary-to-secondary order of influencing factors was hydrochloric acid concentration>hydrolysis time>hydrolysis temperature. Furosine in milk showed a good linear relationship within the range of 0.005–0.500 μg/mL, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.9958. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) were 0.20 μg/mL and 0.07 μg/mL, respectively. The average recoveries were 89.09%–97.33%, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 3.37%–7.02% (n=6). Conclusion This method is efficient and accurate. Compared with the traditional hydrolysis methods (12–24 hours), microwave hydrolysis shortens the hydrolysis time to 52 minutes, and there is no significant difference (P>0.05) in the detection results compared with the conventional hydrolysis methods in the industry standard NY/T 939—2016 Identification of reconstituted milk in pasteurized and UHT milk. It can provide technical reference for quality control and heat treatment process evaluation of dairy products.
关键词	微波消解；高效液相色谱-串联质谱法；牛奶；糠氨酸；响应面优化
KeyWord	microwave hydrolysis; ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; milk; furosine; response surface optimization
基金项目
页码	135-143

参考文献
相关文献

[1] LI Y, WU Y, QUAN W, et al. Quantitation of furosine, furfurals, and advanced glycation end products in milk treated with pasteurization and sterilization methods applicable in China
[J]. Food Research International, 2021, 140: 110088.
[2] VAN-BOEKEL MAJS. Effect of heating on maillard reactions in milk
[J]. Food Chemistry, 1998, 62(4): 403–414.
[3] AUGUSTIN MA, RILEY M, STOCKMANN R, et al. Role of food processing in food and nutrition security
[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2016, 56: 115–125.
[4] BOITZ LI, MAYER HK. Evaluation of furosine, lactulose and acid-soluble β-lactoglobulin as time temperature integrators for whipping cream samples at retail in Austria
[J]. International Dairy Journal, 2015, 50: 24–31.
[5] LI MY, SHEN MY, LU JN, et al. Maillard reaction harmful products in dairy products: Formation, occurrence, analysis, and mitigation strategies
[J]. Food Research International, 2022, 151: 110839.
[6] TROISE AD, FIORE A, WILTAFSKY M, et al. Quantification of Nε-(2-furoylmethyl)-l-lysine (furosine), Nε-(carboxymethyl)-l-lysine (CML), Nε-(carboxyethyl)-l-lysine (CEL) and total lysine through stable isotope dilution assay and tandem mass spectrometry
[J]. Food Chemistry, 2015, 188: 357–364.
[7] 王峰恩, 张养东, 郑楠, 等. 奶及奶制品中糠氨酸检测方法的研究进展
[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(6): 2304–2312. WANG FEN, ZHANG YD, ZHENG N, et al. Research progress on the determination of furosine in milk and dairy products
[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2021, 12(6): 2304–2312.
[8] 陈冲冲. 基于 UPLC 的糠氨酸快速检测方法的建立及应用
[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017. CHEN CC. Establishment and application of furosine rapid detection method based on UPLC
[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2017.
[9] 尉鑫欣. 适度热处理对牛乳糠氨酸生成及新鲜控制机制研究
[D]. 杭州: 浙江科技学院, 2020. YU XX. Study on the mechanism of moderate heat treatment on the production of furosine and freshness control in milk
[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, 2020.
[10] 徐文龙, 谢一嘉, 潘洋, 等. 乳制品中美拉德反应有害产物的生成途径、检测方法及其控制策略研究进展
[J]. 食品科学, 2025, 46(3): 274–283. XU WL, XIE YJ, PAN Y, et al. Research progress on harmful products from maillard reaction in dairy products: Generation pathways, detection methods, and control strategies
[J]. Food Science, 2025, 46(3): 274–283.
[11] LI HY, WANG BY, YANG HG, et al. Furosine posed toxic effects on primary sertoli cells through regulating Cep55/NF-κB/PI3K/Akt/FOX01/ TNF-α pathway
[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(15): 3716.
[12] LI HY, WANG YZ, YANG HG, et al. Furosine, a maillard reaction product, triggers necroptosis in hepatocytes by regulating the RIPK1/RIPK3/ MLKL pathway
[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(10): 2388.
[13] 姚桂红, 凌云, 张雨佳, 等. 高效液相色谱-四极杆飞行时间质谱法测定液态乳中糠氨酸
[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(11): 1038–1043. YAO GH, LING Y, ZHANG YJ, et al. Determination of furosine in liquid milk by high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry
[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(11): 1038–1043.
[14] SCHMIDT A, BOITZ LI, MAYER HK. A new UHPLC method for the quantitation of furosine as heat load indicator in commercial liquid milk
[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2017, 56: 104–109.
[15] 徐大江, 马占峰, 赵丽娟, 等. 乳制品中糠氨酸和乳铁蛋白常用检测方法综述
[J]. 中国乳业, 2023(1): 52–57. XU DJ, MA ZF, ZHAO LJ, et al. Common methods of furosine and lactoferrin in dairy products
[J]. China Dairy, 2023(1): 52–57.
[16] WANG FE, ZHANG YD, WEN F, et al. Rapid determination of furosine in milk using microwave-assisted HCl hydrolysis and ultra-performance liquid chromatography
[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2020, 103(12): 11086–11093.
[17] 马玉娥, 郭万慧, 安静, 等. 微波消解——高效液相色谱法检测牛乳中糠氨酸
[J]. 乳品与人类, 2023(6): 14–19. MA YE, GUO WH, AN J, et al. Determination of furosine in cow’s milk by microwave digestion-high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
[J]. Dairy and Humankind, 2023(6): 14–19.
[18] 王俊霞, 徐思婕, 孙悦莹, 等. 基于响应面法的基质固相分散萃取土壤中有机磷阻燃剂
[J]. 色谱. 2024, 42(1): 64–74. WANG JX, XU SJ, SUN YY, et al. Matrix solid-phase dispersion extraction of organophosphorus flame retardants in soil based on response surface methodology
[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2024, 42(1): 64–74.
[19] 王玉霞, 高向娜, 李拥军, 等. 基于响应面法的吹扫捕集-气相色谱-质谱法测定生活饮用水中 54 种挥发性有机物的含量
[J]. 理化检验-化学分册, 2023, 59(5): 569–577. WANG YX, GAO XN, LI YJ, et al. Determination of 54 volatile organic compounds in drinking water by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with purge and trap based on response surface method
[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis (Part B: Chemical Analysis), 2023, 59(5): 569–577.
[20] 户江涛. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定牛奶中糠氨酸
[J]. 分析试验室, 2020, 39(3): 346–349. HU JT. Determination of furosine in milk by ultra performance liquid chromatographytandem mass spectrometry
[J]. Chinese Journal of Analysis Laboratory, 2020, 39(3): 346–349.
[21] 周鑫, 李爱军, 张宁, 等. 液相色谱串联质谱法测定 UHT 液态奶中的糠氨酸
[J]. 食品科技, 2020, 45(5): 309–313. ZHOU X, LI AIJ, ZHANG N, et al. Determination of furosine in UHT milk by high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrum
[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2020, 45(5): 309–313.
[22] 何瑛, 纪坤发, 杨美丰, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定牛奶中糠氨酸含量
[J]. 中国乳业, 2022(8): 83–89. HE Y, JI KF, YANG MF, et al. Determination of furosine in milk by high performance liquid chromatography
[J]. China Dairy, 2022(8): 83–89.
[23] 史孟杰, 胡晓楠, 谢瑜杰, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定蜂王浆中糠氨酸
[J]. 质量安全与检验检测, 2024, 34(4): 1–6, 16. SHI MJ, HU XN, XIE YJ, et al. Determination of furosine in royal jelly by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
[J]. Quality Safety Inspection and Testing, 2024, 34(4): 1–6, 16.
[24] 冯婉莹, 刘结容, 郑学殷, 等. UPLC-Q-TOF/MS 法测定液态乳中的糠氨酸
[J]. 中国乳品工业, 2019, 47(6): 48–50. FENG WY, LIU JR, ZHENG XY, et al. Determination of furosine in the liquid milk by ultra performance liquid chro?matography with ultra resolution quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer
[J]. China Dairy Industry, 2019, 47(6): 48–50.
[25] MORENO FJ, MOLINA E, OLANO A, et al. High-pressure effects on maillard reaction between glucose and lysine
[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2003, 51(2): 394–400.
[26] 王令智, 陈平, 郭振华, 等. 响应面优化超声辅助提取淫羊藿总黄酮工艺及抗氧化活性研究
[J]. 饲料研究, 2025(4): 92–97. WANG LZ, CHEN P, GUO ZH, et al. Study on response surface optimization of ultrasonic-assistedextraction of total flavonoids from epimedium and its antioxidant activity
[J]. Feed Research, 2025(4): 92–97.
[27] 陈衍真, 满文娟, 程雷娜, 等. 响应面法优化肉苁蓉多糖提取液的脱色工艺及其抗氧化活性研究
[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2025, 16(5): 94–103. CHEN YZ, MAN WJ, CHEN LN, et al. Optimization of decolorization process and antioxidant activity of Cistanche deserticola polysaccharide extract by response surface methodology
[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2025, 16(5): 94–103.
[28] 陈安, 杨柳, 王思雨, 等. 响应面法优化超声波辅助酸法提取菠萝蜜果皮果胶工艺及理化性质研究
[J]. 广东化工, 2025, 52(5): 50–54, 69. CHEN AN, YANG L, WANG SY, et al. Response surface method optimization ultrasonic-assisted acid extraction process and physicochemical properties of jackfruit peel pectin
[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2025, 52(5): 50–54, 69.
[29] 葛麒, 朱春燕, 陈湖南, 等. 松茸蛋白抗氧化肽制备及构效关系研究
[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2023, 14(9): 9–17. GE Q, ZHU CY, CHEN HN, et al. Research on preparation and structure-activity relationship of Tricholoma matsutake protein antioxidant peptide
[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2023, 14(9): 9–17.
[30] 刘东玲, 司皓, 郑宝江, 等. 响应面法优化酶解辅助-超声提取菥蓂中的黑芥子苷
[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2024, 26(4): 225–233. LIU DL, SI H, ZHENG BJ, et al. Optimization of enzyme assisted-ultrasonic extraction of sinigrin in thlaspi arvense seeds by response surface methodology
[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024, 26(4): 225–233.

引用本文

姚桂红, 梁超, 姚美伊, 邢仕歌, 韩旭杰, 吴明鸽,凌云*, 许秀丽*. 微波消解-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法定量检测牛乳中糠氨酸 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2025; 16; (13). 135 - 143.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构