Measuring Corporate Compliance with the SDGs Based on the GRI’s ESG Reporting Methodology

Measuring Corporate Compliance with the SDGs Based on the GRI’s ESG Reporting Methodology

ES评分 0

DOI 10.20900/jsr20250010
刊名
JSR
年,卷(期) 2025, 7(1)
作者
作者单位

Doctoral School of Regional and Economic Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Győr 9026, Hungary ;
Statistics, Finance and Controlling Department, Széchenyi István University, Győr 9026, Hungary ;

Abstract
Background: This research examines the efficiency of ESG reporting in corporate contributions toward achieving the SDGs, relative to the literature gaps and sectoral differences in reporting practices. It also highlights that full ESG disclosure is invariably instrumental in ensuring corporate transparency and accountability. Methods: The study used the GRI framework to analyze SDG compliance in sustainability reports from companies in the technology, automotive, energy, and health sectors. Results: Key findings include significant variations in SDG compliance across industries: the automotive sector demonstrated the highest compliance at 85%, while the technology sector showed the lowest at 49%. The study also found a notable difference between reported and substantiated SDGs, indicating that many companies engage in ‘rainbow washing’ or ‘cherry-picking’ SDGs to fit their agendas without fully integrating them into their strategies. The research concludes that although the GRI framework provide. Conclusions: The study urges the combination of other standards, such as ESRS and SASB, together with more intense regulatory frameworks and industry-specific guidelines to increase comparability and the credibility of the reports on sustainability.
KeyWord
ESG ratings; ESG reporting; SDGs; sustainability reporting; regulatory frameworks
基金项目
页码 -
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

Bence Lukács*,Péter Molnár,Árpád Tóth. Measuring Corporate Compliance with the SDGs Based on the GRI’s ESG Reporting Methodology, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2025; 7; (1). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20250010.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构