Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review-Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review

Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review

ES评分 0 浏览量：705 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/agmr20230003
刊名	Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research AGMR
年，卷(期)	2023, 5(1)
作者	Joseph A. Mikels*,David B. Taullahu,
作者单位	Department of Psychology, DePaul University, 2219 North Kenmore Avenue, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
Abstract	Over the past few decades, interest has begun to surge in understanding the role of emotion in decision making, and more recently in studies across the adult life span. Relevant to age-related changes in decision making, theoretical perspectives in judgment and decision making draw critical distinctions between deliberative versus intuitive/affective processes, as well as integral versus incidental affect. Empirical findings demonstrate the central role of affect in various decision-related domains such as framing and risk taking. To situate this review within an adult life-span context, we focus on theoretical perspectives in adult development regarding emotion and motivation. As a result of age differences in deliberative and emotional processes, taking a life-span perspective is critical to advance a comprehensive and grounded understanding of the role of affect in decision making. Age-related shifts in information processing from negative toward positive material also have consequential implications. By taking a life-span perspective, not only will decision theorists and researchers benefit, but so too will practitioners who encounter individuals of various ages as they make consequential decisions.
KeyWord	aging; emotion; cognition; decision making; intuition
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1. Hibbard JH, Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, Tusler M. Is the informed choice policy approach appropriate for Medicare beneficiaries? Health Affairs. 2001;20(3):199-203. 2. Meeks S. Gerontology in a time of pandemic: An introduction to the special collection. Gerontologist. 2021;61(1):1-2. 3. Resnick B, Zimmerman S, Gerontological Society of America COVID-19 Task Force. COVID-19 recommendations for research from the Gerontological Society of America COVID-19 Task Force. Gerontologist. 2021;61(2):137-40. 4. Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS. Emotion and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66(1):799-823. 5. Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(2):267-86. 6. Mikels JA, Shuster MM, Thai ST. Aging, emotion, & decision making. In Hess TM, Strough J. Loeckenhoff CE, editors. Aging and decision making: Empirical and applied perspectives. Cambridge (US): Elsevier Academic Press; 2015. pp. 169-88. 7. Strough J, Karns TE, Schlosnagle L. Decision-making heuristics and biases across the life span. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1235(1):57-74. 8. Epstein S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol. 1994;49(8):709-724. 9. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol. 2003;58(9):697-720. 10. Reyna VF. How people make decisions that involve risk: A dual process approach. Current Directions in Psychol Sci. 2004;13(2):60-66. 11. Evans JSBT. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Ann Rev Psychol. 2008;59, 255-278. 12. Lerner JS, Keltner D. Fear, anger, and risk. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(1):146-59. 13. Tiedens LZ, Linton S. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81(6):973-88. 14. Damasio AR. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. London (UK): Penguin Books; 2005. 15. Schwarz N, Clore GL. Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York (US): Guilford Press; 2007. pp. 385-407. 16. Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Rational actors or rational fools: Implications of the affect heuristic for behavioral economics. J Soc Econ. 2002;31(4):329-42. 17. Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decis Mak. 2000;13(1):1-17. 18. Peters E, Hart PS, Fraenkel L. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(3):432-6. 19. Slovic P, Peters E, Finucane ML, MacGregor DG. Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychol. 2005;24(4S):S35-40. 20. Hsee CK. The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1996;67(3):247-57. 21. Hsee CK. Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than high value options. J Behav Decis Mak. 1998;11(2):107-21. 22. Denes-Raj V, Epstein S. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;66(5):819-29. 23. Mikels JA, Maglio SJ, Reed AE, Kaplowitz LJ. Should I go with my gut? Investigating the benefits of emotion-focused decision making. Emotion. 2011;11(4):743-53. 24. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2000. 25. Rothman AJ.;Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121(1):3-19. 26. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453-8. 27. Levin IP, Schneider SL, Gaeth GJ. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1998;76(2):149-88. 28. Minton AR, Young NA, Nievera MA, Mikels JA. Positivity helps the medicine go down: Leveraging framing and affective contexts to enhance the likelihood to take medications. Emotion. 2021;21(5):1062-73. 29. Peters E, Hart PS, Fraenkel L. Informing patients the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Med Decis Mak. 2011;31(3):432-36. 30. De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain. Science. 2006;313(5787):684-7. 31. Cheung E, Mikels JA. I'm feeling lucky: The relationship between affect and risk seeking in the framing effect. Emotion. 2011;11(4):852-9. 32. Young NA, Shuster MM, Mikels JA. The sure thing: The role of integral affect in risky choice framing. Emotion. 2019;19(6):1035-43. 33. Gallagher KM, Updegraff JA. Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43(1):101-16. 34. O’Keefe DJ, Jensen JD. The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain framed and loss-framed messages. Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2006;30(1):1-43. 35. O’Keefe DJ, Jensen JD. The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. J Health Commun. 2007;12(7):623-44. 36. Dillard JP, Weber KM, Vail RG. The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: A meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research. J Commun. 2007;57(4):613-31. 37. van't Riet J, Ruiter RA, Werrij MQ, De Vries H. Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin-cancer detection. Psychol Health. 2010;25(3):339-49. 38. Liu X, Shuster MM, Mikels JA, Stine-Morrow EA. Doing what makes you happy: Health message framing for younger and older adults. Exp Aging Res. 2019;45(4):293-305. 39. Mikels JA, Shuster MM, Thai ST, Smith-Ray R, Waugh CE, Roth K, Keilly A, Stine-Morrow EL. Messages that matter: Age differences in affective responses to framed health messages. Psychol Aging. 2016;31(4):409-14. 40. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179-211. 41. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Park DC. How does it STAC up? Revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. Neuropsychol Rev. 2014;24(3):355-70. 42. Strough J, Parker AM, Bruine de Bruin W. Understanding life-span developmental changes in decision-making competence. In Hess T, Strough J, Löckenhoff C, editors. Aging and decision making: Empirical and applied perspectives. Cambridge (MA, US): Academic Press; 2015. pp. 235-57. 43. Blanchard-Fields F, Jahnke HC, Camp C. Age differences in problem-solving style: The role of emotional salience. Psychol Aging. 1995;10(2):173-80. 44. Carstensen LL, Mikels JA, Mather M. Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation and emotion. In Birren J, Schaie KW, editors. Handbook of the psychology of aging. Cambridge (MA, US): Academic Press. 2006. pp. 343-62. 45. Carstensen LL, Pasupathi M, Mayr U, Nesselroade JR. Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;79(4):644-55. 46. Carstensen LL, Turan B, Scheibe S, Ram N, Ersner-Hershfeld H, Samanez-Larkin GR, et al. Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychol Aging, 2011;26(1):21-33. 47. Charles ST, Reynolds CA, Gatz M. Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2001;80(1):136-51. 48. Mroczek DK, Kolarz CM. The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(5):1333-49. 49. Young NA, Waugh CW, Minton AR, Charles ST, Haase CM, Mikels JA. Reactive, Agentic, Apathetic, or Challenged? Aging, Emotion, and Coping During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gerontologist. 2021;61(2):217-28. 50. Burr DA, Castrellon JJ, Zald DH, Samanez-Larkin GR. Emotion dynamics across adulthood in everyday life: Older adults are more emotionally stable and better at regulating desires. Emotion. 2021;21(3):453-64. 51. Gross JJ, Carstensen LL, Pasupathi M, Tsai J, Götestam Skorpen C, Hsu AY. Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychol Aging. 1997;12(4):590-9. 52. Lawton MP, Kleban MH, Dean J. Affect and age: Cross-sectional comparisons of structure and prevalence. Psychol Aging. 1993;8(2):165-75. 53. Kunzmann U, Kupperbusch CS, Levenson RW. Behavioral inhibition and amplification during emotional arousal: A comparison of two age groups. Psychol Aging. 2005;20(1):144-58. 54. Carstensen LL, Mikels JA. At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2005;14(3):117-21. 55. Carstensen LL. The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science. 2006;312(5782):1913-5. 56. Mikels JA, Reed AE, Hardy LN, Loeckenhoff CE. Positive emotions across the adult life span. In Tugade MM, Shiota MN, Kirby LD, editors. Handbook of positive emotions. New York (US): Guilford Press. 2014. pp. 256-72. 57. Reed AE, Chan L, Mikels JA. Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychol Aging. 2014;29(1):1-15. 58. Mikels JA, Shuster MM. The interpretative lenses of older adults are not rose-colored—just less dark: Aging and the interpretation of ambiguous scenarios. Emotion. 2016;16(1):94-100. 59. Shuster MM, Mikels JA, Camras LA. Adult age differences in the interpretation of surprised facial expressions. Emotion. 2017;17(2):191. 60. Charles ST, Mather M, Carstensen LL. Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003;132(2):310-24. 61. Fung HH, Carstensen LL. Sending memorable messages to the old: Age differences in preferences and memory for advertisements. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85(1):163-78. 62. Kensinger EA, Brierley B, Medford N, Growdon JH, Corkin S. Effects of normal aging and Alzheimer's disease on emotional memory. Emotion. 2002;2(2):118-34. 63. Mikels JA, Larkin GR, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Carstensen LL. Divergent trajectories in the aging mind: Changes in working memory for affective versus visual information with age. Psychol Aging. 2005;20(4):542-53. 64. Baddeley AD. Working memory. Oxford (UK): Clarendon Press; 1986. 65. Mikels JA, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Affective working memory: An integrative psychological construct. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019;14(4):543–59. 66. Mikels JA, Young NA. New directions in theories of emotion and aging. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2018. 67. Labouvie-Vief G. Dynamic integration affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12(6):201-6. 68. Urry HL, Gross JJ. Emotion regulation in older age. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010;19(6):352-357. 69. Charles ST. Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(6):1068-91. 70. Young NA, Minton AR, Mikels JA. The appraisal approach to aging and emotion: An integrative theoretical framework. Dev Rev. 2021;59:100947. 71. Strough J, Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Lemaster P, Pichayayothin N, Delaney R. Hour glass half full or half empty? Future time perspective and preoccupation with negative events across the life span. Psychol Aging. 2016;31(6):558. 72. Mikels JA, Löckenhoff CE, Maglio SJ, Carstensen LL, Goldstein MK, Garber A. Following your heart or your head: Focusing on emotions versus information differentially influences the decisions of younger and older adults. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010;16(1):87-95. 73. Bruine de Bruin W, Parker AM, Fischhoff B. Explaining adult age differences in decision‐making competence. J Behav Decis Mak. 2012;25(4):352-60. 74. Queen TL, Hess TM. Age differences in the effects of conscious and unconscious thought in decision making. Psychol Aging. 2010;25(2):251-61. 75. Strough J, Mehta CM, McFall JP, Schuller KL. Are older adults less subject to the sunk-cost fallacy than younger adults? Psychol Sci. 2008;19(7):650-2. 76. Löckenhoff CE, Carstensen LL. Aging, emotion, and health-related decision strategies: Motivational manipulations can reduce age differences. Psychol Aging. 2007;22(1):134-46. 77. Mather M, Knight M, McCaffrey M. The allure of the alignable: Younger and older adults' false memories of choice features. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005;134(1):38-51. 78. Kim S, Healey MK, Goldstein D, Hasher L, Wiprzycka UJ. Age differences in choice satisfaction: A positivity effect in decision making. Psychol Aging. 2008;23(1):33-8. 79. English T, Carstensen LL. Does positivity operate when the stakes are high? Health status and decision making among older adults. Psychol Aging. 2015;30(2):348. 80. Mikels JA, Reed AE. Monetary losses do not loom large in later life: Age differences in the framing effect. J Gerontol B. 2009;64(4):457-460. 81. Shamaskin AM, Mikels JA, Reed AE. Getting the message across: Age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages. Psychol Aging. 2010;25(3):746-51. 82. Notthoff N, Carstensen LL. Positive messaging promotes walking in older adults. Psychol Aging. 2014;29(2):329. 83. Isaacowitz DM, Choi Y. Looking, feeling, and doing: Are there age differences in attention, mood, and behavioral responses to skin cancer information? Health Psychol. 2012;31(5):650-9. 84. Mikels JA, Young NA, Liu X, Stine-Morrow EAL. Getting to the heart of the matter in later life: The central role of affect in health message framing. Gerontologist. 2021;61(5):756-62. 85. von Helversen B, Mata R. Losing a dime with a satisfied mind: Positive affect predicts less search in sequential decision making. Psychol Aging. 2012;27(4):825-39. 86. Mikels JA, Cheung E, Cone J, Gilovich T. The dark side of intuition: Aging and increases in nonoptimal intuitive decisions. Emotion. 2013;13(2):189-95. 87. Albert SM, Duffy J. Differences in risk aversion between young and older adults. Neurosci Neuroecon. 2012;2012(1):3-9. 88. Bonem EM, Ellsworth PC, Gonzalez R. Age differences in risk: Perceptions, intentions and domains. J Behav Decis Mak. 2015;28(4):317-30. 89. Josef AK, Richter D, Samanez-Larkin GR, Wagner GG, Hertwig R, Mata R. Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016;111(3):430. 90. Mamerow L, Frey R, Mata R. Risk taking across the life span: A comparison of self-report and behavioral measures of risk taking. Psychol Aging. 2016;31(7):711. 91. Rolison JJ, Hanoch Y, Wood S, Liu PJ. Risk-taking differences across the adult life span: A question of age and domain. J Gerontol Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013;69, 870-80. 92. Schooley DK, Worden DD. Investors' asset allocations versus life-cycle funds. Financ Anal J. 1999;55(5):37-43. 93. Yao R, Sharpe DL, Wang F. Decomposing the age effect on risk tolerance. J Soc Econ. 2011;40(6):879-87. 94. Mata R, Josef AK, Samanez‐Larkin GR, Hertwig R. Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1235(1):18-29. 95. Carpenter SM, Peters E, Västfjäll D, Isen AM. Positive feelings facilitate working memory and complex decision making among older adults. Cogn Emot. 2013;27(1):184-92. 96. Chen Y, Ma X. Age differences in risky decisions: The role of anticipated emotions. Educ Gerontol. 2009;35(7):575-86. 97. Chou K, Lee TC, Ho AY. Does mood state change risk taking tendency in older adults? Psychol Aging. 2007;22(2):310-18. 98. Depping MK, Freund AM. When choice matters: Task-dependent memory effects in older adulthood. Psychol Aging. 2013;28(4):923-36. 99. Mather M, Mazar N, Gorlick MA, Lighthall NR, Burgeno J, Schoeke A, et al. Risk preferences and aging: The “certainty effect” in older adults' decision making. Psychol Aging. 2012;27(4):801-16. 100. Depping MK, Freund AM. Normal aging and decision making: The role of motivation. Hum Dev. 2011;54(6):349-367. 101. Freund AM, Ebner NC. The aging self: Shifting from promoting gains to balancing losses. In Greve W, Rothermund K, Wentura D, editors. The adaptive self: Personal continuity and intentional self-development. Göttingen (Germany): Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. 2005. pp. 185-202.

引用本文

Joseph A. Mikels*,David B. Taullahu. Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making: A State of the Art Mini-Review, Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research. 2023; 5; (1). https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20230003.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构