The “Holistic Approach to the Cultural Heritage Impact Method” (HACHI Method) as a Method for Indicator-Based Impact Analysis: An Application to the Case of Imperial Fora in Rome (Italy)-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

The “Holistic Approach to the Cultural Heritage Impact Method” (HACHI Method) as a Method for Indicator-Based Impact Analysis: An Application to the Case of Imperial Fora in Rome (Italy)

The “Holistic Approach to the Cultural Heritage Impact Method” (HACHI Method) as a Method for Indicator-Based Impact Analysis: An Application to the Case of Imperial Fora in Rome (Italy)

ES评分 0 浏览量：294 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr.20240015
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2024, 6(2)
作者	Cristina Coscia*,Irene Aterelli,
作者单位	1 Department of Architecture and Design (DAD), Polytechnic of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy; 2 Architect, Reggio Emilia 42121, Italy
Abstract	This research starts from the results of the “Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe” (CHCfE) project, which highlights the need to apply the holistic approach when measuring the impact of Cultural Heritage making it an active part of sustainable development. In this research, CHCfE was scaled on and adapted to the Italian case of the Imperial Fora in Rome, in order to create a tool to manage a complex archaeological area in an urban context: the simulation dates back to 2017 but does not seem to be outdated. The Italian case lays the foundations for a debate on good practice in line with the milestones incorporated into the repository of the recent SoPHIA platform. The experimentation has developed a new method—the HACHI Method (the Holistic Approach to the Cultural Heritage Impact Method)—which is still fully aligned with these principles and is partof the current debate, with strong elements of innovation: it is our intention to illustrate the key elements of this method, enphasising its potential for other contexts.
KeyWord	sustainable development for Cultural Heritage; holistic impact assessment; indicator-based impact analysis; Imperial Fora; semi-structured interviews; urban archaeology
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1. Robert KW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA. What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment. 2005;47(3):8-21. 2. Throsby D. Linking Cultural and Ecological Sustainability. Int J Divers Organ Communities Nations. 2008;8(1):15. 3. Moretti V, Naretto M, Fregonara E. Sostenibilità e interventi sul patrimonio storico: approcci a confront
[Sustainability and interventions on historical heritage: compared approaches]. Available from: https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/4461140. Accessed 2024 May 8. Italian. 4. UNESCO. Universal declaration on cultural diversity. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/unesco-universal-declaration-cultural-diversity. Accessed 2024 May 8. 5. Gražulevičiūtė I. Cultural heritage in the context of sustainable development. Environ Res Eng Manag. 2006;37(3):74-9. 6. Sophia Platform. Social Platform for Holistic Heritage Impact Assessment. Available from: https://sophiaplatform.eu/. Accessed 2024 May 12. 7. Council of Europe. Framework convention on the value of cultural heritage for society (Faro Convention). Available from: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/ EN/Treaties/Html/199.htm. Accessed 2015 Apr 2. 8. Ashworth GJ, Graham B, Tunbridge JE. Pluralising pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London (UK): Pluto Press; 2007. 9. CHCfE. Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. Available from: http://blogs.encatc.org/culturalheritagecountsforeurope/outcomes. Accessed 2024 May 12. 10. Coscia C, Curto R. Valorising in the absence of public resources and weak markets: The case of “Ivrea, the 20th century industrial city”. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_7. Accessed 2024 May 8. 11. Coscia C, Lazzari G, Rubino I. Values, memory, and the role of exploratory methods for policy-design processes and the sustainable redevelopment of waterfront contexts: The case of Officine Piaggio (Italy). Sustainability. 2018;10(9):2989. 12. Coscia C, Rubino I. Fostering new value chains and social impact-oriented strategies in urban regeneration processes: what challenges for the evaluation discipline? Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_92. Accessed 2024 May 8. 13. Nocca F, Girard LF. Towards an integrated evaluation approach for cultural urban landscape conservation/regeneratio. Region. 2018;5(1):33-51. 14. García G, Carofilis N, Van Balen K. Towards a contemporary approach to the study of Development and Cultural Heritage. Available from: http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/38790/1/documento.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 8. 15. Van Balen K, Vandesande A. Heritage counts. Available from: https://re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/e0c31c0a-80f3-4599-e053-1705fe0aef77/2.%20Heritage%20counts.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 8. 16. European Commission. Horizon 2020 Work: Programme 2018–2020: 13. Europe in a changing world—Inclusive, innovative and reflective societies. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2018-2020/main/h2020-wp1820-societies_en.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 12. 17. Aterelli I. L’applicazione dell’approccio olistico alla valutazione di impatto basata su indicatori: Il caso dei Fori Imperiali a Roma
[The application of the holistic approach to indicator-based impact assessment: The case of the Imperial Forums in Rome]. Available from: https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/secure/6637/1/tesi.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 8. Italian. 18. Caffo R. Digital cultural heritage projects: Opportunities and future challenges. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014;38:12-7. 19. Hanania LR. Cultural diversity in international law: the effectiveness of the UNESCO convention on the protection and promotion of the diversity of cultural expressions. Available from: https://books.google.com.sg/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=IqxwAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=VjijMfM3xg&sig=R19JkFmk_frVnIsFKplqPeNJiT4#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed 2024 May 8. 20. Lähdesmäki T. The EU’S Explicit and Implicit Heritage Politics. Eur Soc. 2014;16(3):401-21. 21. Zagato L. The notion of “Heritage Community” in the Council of Europe’s Faro Convention. Its impact on the European legal framework. Available from: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/32470/1/610380.pdf#page=149. Accessed 2024 May 8. 22. UNESCO. The Hangzhou Declaration: Placing Culture at the Heart of Sustainable Development Policies. Available from: http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/images/FinalHangzhouDeclaration20130517.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 12. 23. Riganti P, Nijkamp P. Benefit transfers of cultural heritage values-how far can we go? Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/117506. Accessed 2024 May 8. 24. Fiorani D, Kealy L, Musso S, Plevoets B, Houbart C, Van Cleempoel K. Conservation/adaptation. Keeping alive the spirit of the place. Adaptive reuse of heritage with symbolic value. Hasselt (Belgium): EAAE; 2017. 25. Vecco M. Value and values of cultural heritage. In: Campelo A, Reynolds L, Lindgreen A, Beverland M, editors. Cultural Heritage. 1st ed. London (UK): Routledge; 2018. p. 23-38. 26. Augello A, Infantino I, Pilato G, Vitale G. Site experience enhancement and perspective in cultural heritage fruition—a survey on new technologies and methodologies based on a “four-pillars” approach. Fut Inet. 2021;13(4):92. 27. Pinna F, Cogoni M, Pinna A, Cocco GB, Giannattasio C. Extended Accessibility and Cultural Heritage: A New Approach to Fruition and Conservation. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_52. Accessed 2024 May 8. 28. Thys C, Schiltz E, Eeman M. The Impact of Immovable Heritage in the City of Mechelen. Available from: https://books.google.com.hk/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=VBKVCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA121&dq=27.%09Thys,+C.,+Schiltz,+E.,+%26+Eeman,+M.+The+Impact+of+Immovable+Heritage+in+the+City+of+Mechelen.+Heritage+Counts%3B+2016.+2,+p.+121&ots=XwflsKh0xl&sig=GIANA_EtIOnjIgt4PuNUfVb6H9s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed 2024 May 8. 29. Coscia C, Pasquino F. Demand Analysis Models to Support Cultural Tourism Strategy: Application of Conjoint Analysis in North Sardinia (Italy). Land. 2023;12(12):2150. 30. Baioni M, Cicerchia A, Demartini P, Marchegiani L, Marchiori M, Marucci F. SoPHIA model: the conceptual approach. Available from: https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1446/103681. Accessed 2024 May 8. 31. Meneghini R. I Fori imperiali ei Mercati di Traiano: Storia e descrizione dei monumenti alla luce degli studi e degli scavi recenti
[The Imperial Forums and Trajan's Markets: History and description of the monuments in the light of recent studies and excavations]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262089689_I_FORI_IMPERIALI_E_I_MERCATI_DI_TRAIANO_STORIA_E_DESCRIZIONE_DEI_MONUMENTI_ALLA_LUCE_DEGLI_STUDI_E_DEGLI_SCAVI_RECENTI_by_R_MENEGHINI. Accessed 2024 May 8. Italian. 32. Roma Urbanistica. PRG vigente 2008
[PRG in force 2008]. Available from: http://www.urbanistica.comune.roma.it/prg-2008-vigente.html. Accessed 2024 May 12. Italian. 33. Panella R. Roma la città dei Fori. Progetto di sistemazione dell’area archeologica tra piazza Venezia e il Colosseo
[Rome the city of the Forum. Project for the arrangement of the archaeological area between Piazza Venezia and the Colosseum]. Roma (Italy): Prospettive Edizioni; 2013. Italian. 34. Roma Capitale. Reperimento di proposte di attività culturali “Progetto Municipio Creativo 2016” per il periodo compreso tra il 20 maggio e il 17 luglio 2016: Articolo 1
[Finding proposals for cultural activities “Creative Municipality Project 2016” for the period between 20 May and 17 July 2016: Article 1]. Available from: https://www.comune.roma.it/resources/cms/documents/Cultura_2016_anticipazione.pdf. Accessed 2017 Aug 8. Italian. 35. The Plan. Premio Piranesi 2016
[Piranesi Prize 2016]. Available from: https://www.theplan.it/whats_on/piranesi-prix-de-rome-2016. Accessed 2024 May 12. Italian. 36. Ernst & Young Financial Business Advisor S.P. A. Progetto di definizione di un modello per la realizzazione dei Piani di Gestione dei siti UNESCO
[Project to define a model for the creation of Management Plans for UNESCO sites]. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/it/document/read/15103945/modello-per-la-realizzazione-dei-piani-di-gestione-ufficio-. Accessed 2024 May 12. Italian. 37. Lichfield, N. Community impact evaluation: Principles and practice. London (UK): Routledge; 2005. 38. European Commission. Communication from the Commission: Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:en:PDF. Accessed 2024 May 12. 39. Grime MM, Wright G. Delphi method. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305909817_Delphi_Method. Accessed 2024 May 8. 40. Turoff M, Linstone HA. The Delphi method-techniques and application. Available from: http://www.foresight.pl/assets/downloads/publications/Turoff_Linstone.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 8. 41. Brigato MV, Coscia C, Fregonara E. Il “processo Delphi-Multicriteria”: proposta metodologica ed esempio di applicazione nell’ambito degli interventi di valorizzazione
[The “Delphi-Multicriteria process”: methodological proposal and example of application in the context of valorization interventions]. Available from: https://iris.polito.it/handle/11583/2382654. Accessed 2024 May 8. Italian. 42. Coscia C, Dalpiaz PE, Giacopelli E, Infortuna GM. Il caso dell'Unità Residenziale Est—Ex-Hotel La Serra. Il Delphi Method a supporto di scenari di intervento per “ri-Scrivere” la Città di Ivrea
[The case of the East Residential Unit—Ex-Hotel La Serra. The Delphi Method to support intervention scenarios to “re-write” the City of Ivrea]. Available from: https://siev.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/22_05-COSCIA.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 8. Italian. 43. Mármol AM, Puerto J, Fernández FR. The use of partial information on weights in multicriteria decision problems. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal. 1998;7(6):322-9. 44. Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2005;1(2):95-108. 45. Marttunen M, Lienert J, Belton V. Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations. Eur J Oper Res. 2017;263(1):1-17. 46. Eggers J, Holmgren S, Nordström EM, Lämås T, Lind T, Öhman K. Balancing different forest values: Evaluation of forest management scenarios in a multi-criteria decision analysis framework. For Policy Econ. 2019;103:55-69. 47. Urban RJ, Twidale MB, Adamczyk PD. Cultural Heritage Information Dashboard. Available from: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/14909. Accessed 2024 May 8. 48. Catalano CE, Repetto A, Spagnuolo M. A Dashboard for the Analysis of Tangible Heritage Artefacts: A Case Study in Archaeology. Available from: https://diglib.eg.org/items/3035d8bf-e20f-4371-b1ed-1d9a0b246580. Accessed 2024 May 8. 49. Dabbene D, Bartolozzi C, Coscia C. How to monitor and evaluate quality in adaptive heritage reuse projects from a well-being perspective: A proposal for a dashboard model of indicators to support promoters. Sustainability. 2022;14(12):7099. 50. Lorenzoni F. Integrated methodologies based on structural health monitoring for the protection of cultural heritage building. Available from: https://www.research.unipd.it/handle/11577/3194442. Accessed 2024 May 8. 51. Eppich R, García Grinda JL. Management Documentation: Indicators & Good Practice at Cultural Heritage Places. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2015;40:133-40. 52. Nocca F. The role of cultural heritage in sustainable development: Multidimensional indicators as decision-making tool. Sustainability. 2017;9(10):1882. 53. Jelinčić DA. Indicators for cultural and creative industries’ impact assessment on cultural heritage and tourism. Sustainability. 2021;13(14):7732. 54. Di Matteo E, Roma P, Zafonte S, Panniello U, Abbate L. Development of a decision support system framework for cultural heritage management. Sustainability. 2021;13(13):7070. 55. Pinna R, Castelnovo S. Interactive dashboards and data integration: design and tool development for museums. Available from: https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/176324. Accessed 2024 May 8.

引用本文

Cristina Coscia*,Irene Aterelli. The “Holistic Approach to the Cultural Heritage Impact Method” (HACHI Method) as a Method for Indicator-Based Impact Analysis: An Application to the Case of Imperial Fora in Rome (Italy), Journal of Sustainability Research. 2024; 6; (2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr.20240015.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构