Integrating Multi-Criteria Evaluation Techniques with Geographic Information Systems for Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study in Batu City Indonesia-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Integrating Multi-Criteria Evaluation Techniques with Geographic Information Systems for Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study in Batu City Indonesia

Integrating Multi-Criteria Evaluation Techniques with Geographic Information Systems for Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study in Batu City Indonesia

ES评分 0 浏览量：320 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr.20240017
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2024, 6(2)
作者	Lilik Sulistyowati*,Faris Daffa Dzulfiqar,Annisa Dira Hariyanto,Nuryantiningsih Pusporini,Firman Afrianto,Novi Andareswari,
作者单位	Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan 15437, Indonesia
Abstract	The amount of waste produced is rising in line with the world’s population growth. Landfill formation and utilization have increased as a result of this exponential increase in waste generation, particularly in Indonesia. Batu City Indonesia has a high population growth accompanied by the development of commercial and tourism activities. This dynamic causes an increase in waste generation from both domestic and non-domestic waste. Therefore, the addition of a new waste cell is an urgency. The expansion of the landfill waste cell is difficult because the existing landfill site is very close to residential areas. This research aims to identify and formulate alternative locations for landfill development in Batu City. To achieve this goal, analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and K-means clustering were used with the utilization of GIS tools. The AHP process that uses various factors to determine the location of landfill has produced a consistency value of 0.0224 (the analysis results are reliable). The alternatives generated from AHP are landfill feasible locations located in Giripurno, Pandanrejo, Bumiaji, Bulukerto, Sumbergondo, Sumber Brantas, Tulungrejo, Punten, Gunungsari, Songgokerto, Pesanggrahan, and Oro-oro Ombo villages. In the final stage, the K-means clustering analysis produced 5 clusters with the priority cluster located in cluster 1, located in the villages of Bumiaji, Pandanrejo, Giripurno, and Bulukerto.
KeyWord	landfill; analytical hierarchy process; K-means clustering
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1. Dixon TJ. Sustainable Urban Futures and Sustainable Urban Systems in the Built Environment: Towards an Integrated Urban Science Research Agenda. J Sustain Res. 2022;4(4):e220015. 2. Mahyudin R. Study of waste management problems and environmental impacts in landfill. J Environ Tech. 2017;3(1):66-74. 3. Ozbay G, Jones M, Gadde M, Isah S, Attarwala T. Design and Operation of Effective Landfills with Minimal Effects on the Environment and Human Health. J Environ Public Health. 2021;2021:1-13. 4. Spinato S, Yiougo LSA, Bues M. Urban solid waste transportation, composting, recycling, and landfill issues in Subsaharian Africa Cities. J Urban Environ Eng. 2021;15(2):88-102. 5. Eghtesadifard M, Afkhami P, Bazyar A. An integrated approach to the selection of municipal solid waste landfills through GIS, K-Means and multi-criteria decision analysis. Environ Res. 2020;185:109348. 6. Anggara O. Determination of alternative landfill locations in Bandar Lampung City using geographic information system. Geodika J Geogr Sci Educ Stud. 2021;5(1):112-22. 7. Harjanti IM, Anggraini P. Waste management at the Jatibarang Landfill, Semarang City. J Urban Reg Plan. 2020;17(2):185-97. 8. Njoku PO, Edokpayi JN, Odiyo JO. Health and environmental risks of residents living close to a landfill: A case study of thohoyandou landfill, Limpopo province, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(12):2125. 9. Catena AM, Zhang J, Commane R, Murray LT, Schwab MJ, Leibensperger EM, et al. Hydrogen sulfide emission properties from two large landfills in New York State. Atmosphere. 2022;13(8):1251. 10. Dolui S, Sarkar S. Identifying potential landfill sites using multicriteria evaluation modeling and GIS techniques for Kharagpur city of West Bengal, India. Environ Chall. 2021;5:100243. 11. BPS-Statistic of Batu Municipality. Kota Batu Dalam Angka 2023. Available from: https://batukota.bps.go.id/publication/2023/02/28/1308eb3612af549495d305fc/kota-batu-dalam-angka-2023.html. Accessed 2024 May 17. 12. Tashandra N. 7,4 Juta Wisatawan Kunjungi Kota Batu Sepanjang 2022
[7.4 Million Tourists Visit Batu City Throughout 2022]. Available from: https://travel.kompas.com/read/2023/01/03/193052327/74-juta-wisatawan-kunjungi-kota-batu-sepanjang-2022#:~:text=Dikutip dari Antara%2C angka ini ternyata melebihi target,Siddiq di Batu%2C Selasa %283%2F1%2F2023%29%2C seperti dikutip Antara. Accessed 2023 Jul 7. Indonesian. 13. Nugraha P, Andi H. TPA Tlekung Sebarkan Bau Tak Sedap, Kepala DLH Kota Batu Minta Maaf
[Tlekung Landfill Spreads Bad Smell, Head of Batu City DLH Apologizes]. Available from: https://surabaya.kompas.com/read/2022/02/07/202729378/tpa-tlekung-sebarkan-bau-tak-sedap-kepala-dlh-kota-batu-minta-maaf?page=all. Accessed 2023 Jul 10. Indonesian. 14. BSN-National Standardization Agency. Procedure for selecting a landfill site. Available from: https://pesta.bsn.go.id/produk/detail/3618-sni19-3241-1994. Accessed 2023 Aug 20. 15. Kara C, Doratli N. Application of GIS/AHP in siting sanitary landfill: A case study in Northern Cyprus. Waste Manage Res. 2012;30(9):966-80. 16. Demesouka OE, Vavatsikos AP, Anagnostopoulos KP. Suitability analysis for siting MSW landfills and its multicriteria spatial decision support system: Method, implementation and case study. Waste Manage. 2013;33(5):1190-206. 17. Yal GP, Akgün H. Landfill site selection utilizing TOPSIS methodology and clay liner geotechnical characterization: A case study for Ankara, Turkey. B Eng Geol Environ. 2014;73(2):369-88. 18. Yunus AI, Sinaga J, Herliana E, Syaiful AZ, Satriawan D, Sari D, et al. Organic and Inorganic Waste Management. Padang (Indonesia): PT. Global Eksekutif Teknologi; 2022. 19. Yİldİrİm V, Memİsoglu T, Bedİroglu S, Colak HE. Municipal solid waste landfill site selection using multi-criteria decision making and GIS: case study of Bursa Province. Environ Eng Landsc Manage. 2018;26(2):107-19. 20. Mussa A, Suryabhagavan KV. Solid waste dumping site selection using GIS-based multi-criteria spatial modeling: a case study in Logia town, Afar region, Ethiopia. Geol Ecol Landsc. 2021;5(3):186-98. 21. Abujayyab SKM, Ahamad MSS, Yahya AS, Bashir MJK, Aziz HA. GIS modelling for new landfill sites: Critical review of employed criteria and methods of selection criteria. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2016;37(1):1-18. 22. Catalan RB, Perez EI, Perez BZ. Evaluation of 3D scanners to develop virtual reality applications. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4367744. Accessed 2024 May 15. 23. Sumathi VR, Natesan U, Sarkar C. GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill. Waste Manage. 2008;28(11):2146-60. 24. Chen Y, Yu J, Khan S. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multicriteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ Modell Softw. 2010;25(12):1582-91. 25. Renisita D, Sunjoto S, Sarto S. The determination of landfill alternative location in West Tulang Bawang District of Lampung Province. Asean J Syst Eng. 2015;3(1):11-7. 26. Capryani A, Nugroho AW, Saputri VHL, Yuniaristanto. Pemilihan Lokasi Kantor Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Studi Kasus: PT. Monang Sianipar Abadi Surakarta)
[Selection of Office Locations Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method (Case Study: PT. Monang Sianipar Abadi Surakarta)]. Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/performa/article/view/13744. Accessed 2024 May 15. Indonesian. 27. Permatasari CK. Penerapan Analitycal Hierarchy Process (Ahp) dalam Menentukan Lokasi Pabrik Tempe
[Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Determining Tempe Factory Locations]. J Appl Sci. 2020;2(2):024-33. Indonesian. 28. Islam MDR, Aziz MDT, Alauddin M, Kader Z. Site suitability assessment for solar power plants in Bangladesh: A GIS-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Approach. Renew Energy. 2024;220:119595. 29. Oktapiani R, Subakti R, Sandy MAL, Kartika DGT, Firdaus D. Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method for choosing majors at SMK Doa Bangsa Palabuhanratu. Swabumi J. 2020;8(2):106-13. 30. Darmanto E, Latifah N, Susanti N. Application of AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method to determine the quality of sugarcane. Simetris J Mech Eng Electr Comput Sci. 2014;5(1):75-82. 31. Ally AM, Yan J, Bennett G, Lyimo NN, Mayunga SD. Assessment of groundwater potential zones using Remote Sensing and GIS-based Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) in Mpwapwa District, Dodoma, Tanzania. Geosyst Geoenviron. 2024;3(1):1-14. 32. Dash M, Sharma K. Competitive analysis of Indian tourism aggregators using multi-criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Mark Bus Commun. 2018;7(3):10-8. 33. Arai K, Barakbah AR. Hierarchical K-means: an algorithm for centroids initialization for K-means. Rep Fac Sci Engrg Saga Univ. 2007;36(1):25-31. 34. Rauf R, Nurdiana N, Maryata M, Rusiyati R, Suwandi S. Overview of household waste management in Kudus District in 2016: EHRA study I. Med J. 2016;9(2):1-14. 35. Wang X, Shao Z, Shen Y, He Y. Research on fast marking method for indicator diagram of pumping well based on K-means clustering. Heliyon. 2023;9(10):e20468. 36. Liu G, Ji F, Sun W, Sun L. Optimization design of short-circuit test platform for the distribution network of integrated power system based on improved K-means clustering. Energy Rep. 2023;9:716-26. 37. Ralambondrainy H. A conceptual version of the K-Means algorithm. Pattern Recognit Lett. 1995;16(11):1147-57. 38. Zhang H, Li J, Zhang J, Dong Y. Speeding up K-Means clustering in high dimensions by pruning unnecessary distance computations. Knowl Based Syst. 2024;284:111262. 39. Walid A, Kusumah RGT, Putra EP, Suciarti P, Herlina W. Effect of landfill on clean water quality in neighboring residential areas: A literature study. Sci J Batanghari Univ Jambi. 2020;20(3):1075-8. 40. Al Awadh M, Mallick J. A decision-making framework for landfill site selection in Saudi Arabia using explainable artificial intelligence and multi-criteria analysis. Environ Technol Innov. 2024;33:103464. 41. BSN-National Standardization Agency of Indonesia. Waste management in residential areas. Available from: https://www.nawasis.org/portal/download/digilib/273-SNI-2008_3242.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 17. 42. Akbar Siregar N, Putra Munir A. Kajian Permeabilitas beberapa Jenis tanah di Lahan Percobaan Kwala Bekala USU Melalui Uji Laboratorium dan Lapangan
[Study of the Permeability of several types of soil at USU’s Kwala Bekala Experimental Field through Laboratory and Field Tests]. Available from: https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/54169. Accessed 2024 May 3. Indonesian. 43. Pattiasina MK, Tondobala L, lakat RSM. Analisis pemilihan lokasi Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (TPA) berbasis geography information system (GIS) di Kota Tomohon
[Analysis of final disposal site (TPA) location selection based on geography information system (GIS) in Tomohon City]. Available from: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/spasial/article/view/22035/21736. Accessed 2024 May 15. Indonesian. 44. Rhendy HM, Hidayat P, Mukhsin D. Penentuan Lokasi Tempat Pembuangan Akhir Sampah (TPA) Kota Prabumulih
[Determining the location of the Prabumulih City final waste disposal site (TPA)]. Available from: https://karyailmiah.unisba.ac.id/index.php/PWK/article/view/3848. Accessed 2024 May 15. Indonesian. 45. Sugiyani Y. Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Lokasi Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (Tpa) Sampah Menggunakan Metode Simple Addictive Weighting (Saw)
[Decision Making System for Determining the Location of Final Waste Disposal Sites (TPA) Using the Simple Addictive Weighting (Saw) Method]. Available from: https://e-jurnal.lppmunsera.org/index.php/jsii/article/view/126. Accessed 2024 May 15. Indonesian. 46. Kamdar I, Ali S, Bennui A, Techato K, Jutidamrongphan W. Municipal solid waste landfill siting using an integrated GIS-AHP approach: A case study from Songkhla, Thailand. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;149:220-35. 47. Cucuzzella C, Goubran S. Infrastructure as a Deeply Integrated Sustainable Urban Project. J Sustain Res. 2019;1(1):e190005. 48. Olatunji PO, Potts J, Failler P, Austin R. Attitudes and perceptions of recreational boat owners on waste management processes: A case study of Chichester Harbour, United Kingdom. J Sustain Res. 2022;4(3):e220013. 49. Kollikkathara N, Huan Feng DY. A system dynamic modeling approach for evaluating municipal solid waste generation, landfill capacity and related cost management issues. Waste Manage. 2010;30(11):2194-203. 50. Aryampa S, Maheshwari B, Sabiiti EN, Bateganya NL, Olobo C. Understanding the impacts of waste disposal site closure on the livelihood of local communities in africa: A case study of the kiteezi landfill in Kampala, Uganda. World Dev Perspect. 2022;25:100391.

引用本文

Lilik Sulistyowati*,Faris Daffa Dzulfiqar,Annisa Dira Hariyanto,Nuryantiningsih Pusporini,Firman Afrianto,Novi Andareswari. Integrating Multi-Criteria Evaluation Techniques with Geographic Information Systems for Landfill Site Selection: A Case Study in Batu City Indonesia, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2024; 6; (2). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr.20240017.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构