Weakness Status is Differentially Associated with Time to Diabetes in Americans-Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Weakness Status is Differentially Associated with Time to Diabetes in Americans

Weakness Status is Differentially Associated with Time to Diabetes in Americans

ES评分 0 浏览量：406 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/agmr20240004
刊名	Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research AGMR
年，卷(期)	2024, 6(3)
作者	Kelly Knoll,Yeong Rhee,Natasha Fillmore,Donald A. Jurivich,Justin J. Lang,Brenda M. McGrath,Grant R. Tomkinson,Ryan McGrath*,
作者单位	1 Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA; 2 Healthy Aging North Dakota, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA; 3 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA; 4 Department of Geriatrics, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA; 5 Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9, Canada; 6 School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada; 7 Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; 8 OCHIN Inc., Portland, OR 97228, USA; 9 Fargo VA Healthcare System, Fargo, ND 58102, USA
Abstract	Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations of (1) individual absolute and body size normalized weakness cut-points, and (2) the collective weakness classifications on time to diabetes in Americans.Methods: We analyzed data from 9577 adults aged at least 50-years from the Health and Retirement Study. Diabetes diagnosis was self-reported. A handgrip dynamometer measured handgrip strength (HGS). Males with HGS <35.5 kg (absolute), <0.45 kg/kg (normalized to body weight), or <1.05 kg/kg/m2 (normalized to BMI) were categorized as weak. Females were classified as weak if their HGS was <20.0 kg, <0.337 kg/kg, or <0.79 kg/kg/m2. Compounding weakness included falling below 1, 2, or all 3 cut-points.Results: Persons below the body weight normalized weakness cut-points had a 1.29 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15–1.47) higher hazard for incident diabetes, while those below the BMI normalized cut-points had a 1.30 (CI: 1.13–1.51) higher hazard. The association between absolute weakness and incident diabetes was insignificant (hazard ratio: 1.06; CI: 0.91–1.24). Americans below 1, 2, or all 3 collective weakness categories
KeyWord	aging; mass screening; muscle strength; muscle strength dynamometer
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1. CDC. National Diabetes Statistics Report. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html. Accessed 2024 Jun 18. 2. Ong KL, Stafford LK, McLaughlin SA, Boyko EJ, Vollset SE, Smith AE, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2023;402(10397):203-34. 3. Khunti K, Chudasama YV, Gregg EW, Kamkuemah M, Misra S, Suls J, et al. Diabetes and Multiple Long-term Conditions: A Review of Our Current Global Health Challenge. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(12):2092-101. 4. O’Hearn M, Lara-Castor L, Cudhea F, Miller V, Reedy J, Shi P, et al. Incident type 2 diabetes attributable to suboptimal diet in 184 countries. Nat Med. 2023;29(4):982-95. 5. CDC. Diabetes Risk Factors. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/risk-factors/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/basics/risk-factors.html. Accessed 2024 Jun 18. 6. Ramsey KA, Rojer AG, D’Andrea L, Otten RH, Heymans MW, Trappenburg MC, et al. The association of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior with skeletal muscle strength and muscle power in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;67:101266. 7. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Hughes BD, Scott D, Sanders KM, Rizzoli R. Nutritional strategies for maintaining muscle mass and strength from middle age to later life: A narrative review. Maturitas. 2020;132:57-64. 8. Cai L, Gonzales T, Wheeler E, Kerrison ND, Day FR, Langenberg C, et al. Causal associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and type 2 diabetes. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):3904. 9. Wang Y, Lee D, Brellenthin AG, Sui X, Church TS, Lavie CJ, et al. Association of muscular strength and incidence of type 2 diabetes. May Clin Proc. 2019;94(4):643-51. 10. Bhasin S, Travison TG, Manini TM, Patel S, Pencina KM, Fielding RA, et al. Sarcopenia definition: the position statements of the sarcopenia definition and outcomes consortium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(7):1410-8. 11. McGrath R, Johnson N, Klawitter L, Mahoney S, Trautman K, Carlson C, et al. What are the association patterns between handgrip strength and adverse health conditions? A topical review. SAGE Open Med. 2020;8:2050312120910358. 12. Manda CM, Hokimoto T, Okura T, Isoda H, Shimano H, Wagatsuma Y. Handgrip strength predicts new prediabetes cases among adults: A prospective cohort study. Prev Med Rep. 2020;17:101056. 13. Boonpor J, Parra-Soto S, Petermann-Rocha F, Ferrari G, Welsh P, Pell JP, et al. Associations between grip strength and incident type 2 diabetes: findings from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021;9(1):e001865. 14. McGrath R, Cawthon P, Clark B, Fielding R, Lang J, Tomkinson G. Recommendations for Reducing Heterogeneity in Handgrip Strength Protocols. J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(2):143-50. 15. Peterson MD, McGrath R, Zhang P, Markides KS, Al Snih S, Wong R. Muscle weakness is associated with diabetes in older Mexicans: the Mexican health and aging study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(10):933-8. 16. Brown EC, Buchan DS, Madi SA, Gordon BN, Drignei D. Grip strength cut points for diabetes risk among apparently healthy US adults. Am J Prev Med. 2020;58(6):757-65. 17. Peterson MD, Zhang P, Choksi P, Markides KS, Al Snih S. Muscle weakness thresholds for prediction of diabetes in adults. Sports Med. 2016;46:619-28. 18. Manini TM, Patel SM, Newman AB, Travison TG, Kiel DP, Shardell MD, et al. Identification of sarcopenia components that discriminate slow walking speed: a pooled data analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(7):1419-28. 19. Cawthon PM, Manini T, Patel SM, Newman A, Travison T, Kiel DP, et al. Putative cut‐points in sarcopenia components and incident adverse health outcomes: an SDOC analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(7):1429-37. 20. Patel SM, Duchowny KA, Kiel DP, Correa‐de‐Araujo R, Fielding RA, Travison T, et al. Sarcopenia Definition & Outcomes Consortium Defined Low Grip Strength in Two Cross‐Sectional, Population‐Based Cohorts. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(7):1438-44. 21. Donini LM, Busetto L, Bischoff SC, Cederholm T, Ballesteros-Pomar MD, Batsis JA, et al. Definition and diagnostic criteria for sarcopenic obesity: ESPEN and EASO consensus statement. Obes Facts. 2022;15(3):321-35. 22. Mesinovic J, Zengin A, De Courten B, Ebeling PR, Scott D. Sarcopenia and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional relationship. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:1057-72. 23. McGrath R, Tomkinson GR, Hamm JM, Juhl K, Knoll K, Parker K, et al. The Role of Different Weakness Cut-Points for Future Cognitive Impairment in Older Americans. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2023;24(12):1936-41. 24. Beaudart C, Rolland Y, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bauer JM, Sieber C, Cooper C, et al. Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice. Calcif Tissue Int. 2019;105(1):1-14. 25. Fisher GG, Ryan LH. Overview of the health and retirement study and introduction to the special issue. Work Aging Retire. 2018;4(1):1-9. 26. Sonnega A, Faul JD, Ofstedal MB, Langa KM, Phillips JW, Weir DR. Cohort profile: the health and retirement study (HRS). Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(2):576-85. 27. HRS. Sample Sizes and Response Rates. Available from: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/sampleresponse.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jun 18. 28. HRS. HRS Data Book. Available from: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/about/data-book. Accessed 2024 Jun 18. 29. Crimmins E, Guyer H, Langa K, Ofstedal MB, Wallace R, Weir D. Documentation of Physical Measures, Anthropometrics and Blood Pressure in the Health and Retirement Study. Available from: https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/dr-011.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jun 18. 30. Turvey CL, Wallace RB, Herzog R. A revised CES-D measure of depressive symptoms and a DSM-based measure of major depressive episodes in the elderly. Int Psychogeriatr. 1999;11(2):139-48. 31. Feng X, Croteau K, Kolt GS, Astell-Burt T. Does retirement mean more physical activity? A longitudinal study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1-7. 32. Lamarca R, Alonso J, Gomez G, Muñoz Á. Left-truncated data with age as time scale: an alternative for survival analysis in the elderly population. J Gerontol A Biol. 1998;53(5):M337-43. 33. Parasoglou P, Rao S, Slade JM. Declining skeletal muscle function in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Ther. 2017;39(6):1085-103. 34. McGrath R. Comparing absolute handgrip strength and handgrip strength normalized to body weight in aging adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(12):1851-3. 35. Albers PH, Pedersen AJ, Birk JB, Kristensen DE, Vind BF, Baba O, et al. Human muscle fiber type–specific insulin signaling: impact of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2015;64(2):485-97. 36. Taha M, AlNaam YA, Al Maqati T, Almusallam L, Altalib G, Alowfi D, et al. Impact of muscle mass on blood glucose level. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2021;33(6):779-87. 37. CDC. Worksite Health Promotion. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/index.html. Accessed 2024 Jun 18. 38. CDC. National Diabetes Prevention Program. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes-prevention/?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/prevention/index.html. Accessed 2024 Jun 18. 39. Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3(1):32. 40. Bauer MS, Kirchner J. Implementation science: What is it and why should I care? Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112376. 41. Nevill AM, Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Wutz W, Myers TD. How should adult handgrip strength be normalized? Allometry reveals new insights and associated reference curves. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(1):162-8.

引用本文

Kelly Knoll,Yeong Rhee,Natasha Fillmore,Donald A. Jurivich,Justin J. Lang,Brenda M. McGrath,Grant R. Tomkinson,Ryan McGrath*. Weakness Status is Differentially Associated with Time to Diabetes in Americans, Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research. 2024; 6; (3). https://doi.org/10.20900/agmr20240004.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构