Sustainable Improvement of Road Safety in Russian Cities: General Trends and the Dialectical Contradictions in the Structure of Risks of Fatalities in Road Traffic Accidents-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Sustainable Improvement of Road Safety in Russian Cities: General Trends and the Dialectical Contradictions in the Structure of Risks of Fatalities in Road Traffic Accidents

Sustainable Improvement of Road Safety in Russian Cities: General Trends and the Dialectical Contradictions in the Structure of Risks of Fatalities in Road Traffic Accidents

ES评分 0 浏览量：335 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr.20240042
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2024, 6(3)
作者	Artur I. Petrov*,Evgeniia V. Likhajrova,
作者单位	The Institute of Transport, Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen 625000, Russia
Abstract	The purpose of this article is to present new empirical data on the trends in improvement of road safety in Russian cities and to structure the nature of risks of fatalities in road traffic accidents. This study examined both the general trends in risks of fatal traffic accidents and the dynamics over time (2015–2023) of the structure of such risks. The research was conducted for four groups of Russian cities, differentiated by population size. The final conclusion of the study is the statement of a steady, progressive reduction in risks of fatalities in road traffic accidents from 2015 to 2023 that is common to all classification groups of Russian cities. A crucial aspect of the research was the study of the structural specifics of risks of fatalities in road traffic accidents for residents of Russian cities and the dynamics of these specifics over time. The analysis made it possible to establish a precise definition of the concept of Road Safety Risk and differentiate this concept into three components—the probability of an accident, the scale of an accident and the severity of the consequences of an accident. The scale and severity ofanaccident together is identical to “the totality of the consequences of an accident”. As part of the research, specific structural features of the risk of roadaccidents were established for Russian cities with different populations; patterns of statistical relationship between the probability of road accidents and the totality of their consequences were established; the risk of death in road accidents for residents of Russian cities was assessed. Based on the research results, a conclusion was made about various mechanisms for the formation of road accidents in different types of cities. The most important result of the study was the establishment of a dialectical contradiction between the probability of an accident and the totality of the consequences of an accident. In general, the research results can be the basis for constructing a multidimensional classification of cities according to the degree of Road Safety Risk and recommendations for reducing therisk of death in road accidents.
KeyWord	road safety (RS); sustainable improvement; road traffic accident (RTA); road safety risk (RSR); the risk of death in a RTA; the probability of a RTA; the totality of the consequences of a RTA; the dialectical inconsistency of risks; human factor
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1. International Transport Forum. Road Safety Annual Report 2022. Available from: https://www.itf-oecd.org/road-safety-annual-report-2022. Accessed 2023 Nov 8. 2. Elvik R, Goel R. Safety-in-numbers: An updated meta-analysis of estimates. Accident Anal Prev. 2019;129:136-47. 3. World Health Organization. Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021–2030. Available from: https://www.who.int/ru/publications/m/item/global-plan-for-the-decade-of-action-for-road-safety-2021-2030. Accessed 2023 Nov 11. 4. Aven T. The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2012;99(3):33-44. 5. Althaus CE. A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. Risk Anal. 2005;25(3):567–88. 6. Oxford English Dictionary. Available from: http://www.oed.comS. Accessed 2023 Nov 13. 7. Wood OG. Evolution of the concept of risk. J Risk Insur. 1964;31(1):83-91. 8. Crowe RM, Horn RC. The meaning of risk. J Risk Insur. 1967;34(3):459-74. 9. Aven T. A semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis, as an alternative to QRAs. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2008;93:768-75. 10. Aven T, Renn O. On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. J Risk Res. 2009;12:1-11. 11. Aven T, Renn O, Rosa E. The ontological status of the concept of risk. Safety Sci. 2011;49:1074-9. 12. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1981;1:11-27. 13. De Moivre Abr. De Mensura Sortis Seu; de Probabilitate Eventuum in Ludis a Casu Fortuito Pendentibus
[De Mesura Lotis Seu; on the Probability of Events in Games Depending on Chance]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/103118. Accessed 2023 Nov 16. Latin. 14. Haynes J. Risk as an economic factor. Q J Econ. 1895;9(4):409-49. 15. Knight FH. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston (US): Houghton Mifflin Company; 1921. 16. Hardy CO. Risk and Risk Bearing. Chicago (US): University of Chicago; 1923. 17. Willett AH. The Economic Theory of Risk and Insurance. Philadelphia (US): The University of Pennsylvania Press; 1901. 18. Mehr RI, Cammack E. Principles of Insurance. Available from: https://archive.org/details/principlesofinsu00mehr. Accessed 2023 Nov 22. 19. Pfeffer I. Insurance and Economic Theory. Available from: https://archive.org/details/insuranceeconomi00pfef/page/n5/mode/2up. Accessed 2023 Nov 22. 20. Angell FJ. Insurance, Principles and Practices. Available from: https://archive.org/details/insurance00rieg/page/n3/mode/2up. Accessed 2023 Nov 22. 21. Mowbray AH, Blanchard RH. Insurance: Its Theory and Practice in the United States. 5th ed. New York (US): McGraw-Hill; 1961. 22. Riegel R, Miller JS. Insurance Principles and Practices. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs (US): Prentice-Hall; 1966. 23. Atheam JL, Travis Pritchett S. Risk and Insurance. New York (US): Appleton-Centoty-Crofts; 1969. 24. Bickelhaupt DL, Magee JH. General Insurance. Available from: https://archive.org/details/generalinsurance00bick/page/n7/mode/2up. Accessed 2023 Nov 22. 25. Lowrance WW. Of Acceptable Risk—Science and the Determination of Safety. Los Altos (US): William Kaufmann Inc; 1976. 26. Rowe WD. An Anatomy of Risk. New York (US): John Wiley & Sons; 1977. 27. Adams J. Risk. London (UK): UCL Press; 1995. 28. Rosa EA. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. J Risk Res. 1998;1:15-44. 29. Cabinet Office. Risk: improving government’s capability to handle risk and uncertainty. Available from: http://integra.com.bo/articulos/RISK%20IMPROVING%20GOVERMENT.pdf. Accessed 2023 Nov 26. 30. Kirchsteiger C. International workshop on promotion of technical harmonisation on risk-based decision-making. Safety Sci. 2002;40:1-15. 31. Ale BJM. Risk assessment practices in The Netherlands. Safety Sci. 2002;40:105-26. 32. Rosa EA. The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Metatheoretical foundation and policy implications. In: Pidegeon N, Kaspersen RE, Slovic P. editors. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 47-9. 33. Campbell S. Determining overall risk. J Risk Res. 2005;8:569-81. 34. IRGC International Risk Governance Council. White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Approach. Available from: https://irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/IRGC_WP_No_1_Risk_Governance__reprinted_version_3.pdf. Accessed 2023 Nov 28. 35. Aven T. A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis and management covering both safety and security. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2007;92(6);745-54. 36. Willis HH. Guiding resource allocations based on terrorism risk. Risk Anal. 2007;27(3):597-606. 37. Verma M, Verter V. Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: Population exposure to airborne toxins. Comput Oper Res. 2007;34(5):1287-303. 38. ISO. Risk Management—Vocabulary. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/44651.html. Accessed 2023 Nov 26. 39. ISO. Risk Management—Principles and Guidelines. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/43170.html. Accessed 2023 Nov 26. 40. Aven T. On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 2010;95:623-31. 41. Aven E, Aven T. On how to understand and express enterprise risk. Int J Bus Contin Risk Manage. 2011;2(1):20-34. 42. Petrov AI. Information and Entropy Aspects of the Specifics of Regional Road Traffic Accident Rate in Russia. Information. 2023;14:138. 43. Petrov AI. Philosophy and Meanings of the Information Entropy Analysis of Road Safety: Case Study of Russian Cities. Information. 2023;14:302. 44. Math.net. Combination. Available from: https://www.math.net/combination. Accessed 2023 Nov 29. 45. Vecino-Ortiz AI, Nagarajan M, Elaraby S, Guzman-Tordecilla DN, Paichadze N, Hyder AA. Saving lives through road safety risk factor interventions: global and national estimates. Lancet. 2022;400:237-50. 46. Hakkert AS, Braimaister L. The uses of exposure and risk in road safety studies. Available from: https://swov.nl/system/files/publication-downloads/r-2002-12.pdf. Accessed 2023 Nov 30. 47. DENCO (GR), University of Brescia (I), INRETS (F), TRL (UK), AUTh (GR). Accident Investigation; final report Work Package 4. Developing Urban Management And Safety (DUMAS); 1998. 48. Cai X, Lei C, Peng B, Tang X, Gao Z. Road Traffic Safety Risk Estimation Method Based on Vehicle Onboard Diagnostic Data. J Adv Transport. 2020;2020(1):3024101. 49. Tripodia A, Mazziaa E, Reinaa F, Borronib S, Fagnano M, Tiberia P. A simplified methodology for road safety risk as-sessment based on automated video image analysis. Transport Res Proced. 2020;45:275-84. 50. Liu G, Chen S, Zeng Z, Cui H, Fang Y, Gu D, et al. Risk factors for extremely serious road accidents: Results from national Road Accident Statistical Annual Report of China. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201587. 51. Elvik R, Vaa T, Høye A, Sørenson M. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. 2nd ed. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/9781848552517-010/full/html. Accessed 2024 Jul 22. 52. Elvik R. Does the Use of Formal Tools for Road Safety Management Improve Safety Performance? Transport Res Rec. 2012;2318:1-6. 53. Zwetsloot GIJM, Kines P, Wybo JL, Ruotsala R, Drupsteen L, Bezemer RA. Zero Accident Vision based strategies in organisations: Innovative perspectives. Safety Sci. 2017;91:260-8. 54. Wilde GJS. The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health. Risk Anal. 1982;2:209-25. 55. Simonet S, Wilde GJS. Risk: Perception, Acceptance and Homeostasis. Appl Psychol. 2008;46(3):235-52. 56. Petrov AI, Kolesov VI. Road traffic accident rate in Russia: main socio-economic factors of its formation and spatio-temporal features. Econ Soc Change. 2021;14(1):199-220. 57. Petrov A, Zakharov D, Evtyukov S, Grakov F, Petrova D. Evaluation of the orderliness of the road safety provision systems in Russian cities. Front Built Environ. 2022;8:981078. 58. Wilde GJS. Risk Homeostasis Theory: An Overview. Injury Prev. 1998;4(2):89-91. 59. Monderman H, Clarke E, Baillie BH. Shared space—the alternative approach to calming traffic. Traffic Eng Control. 2006;47:290-2. 60. The Official Website of the State Traffic Inspectorate of the Russian Federation. Indicators of the State of Road Safety. Available from: http://stat.gibdd.ru/. Accessed 2023 Dec 1. 61. Schwetsov V, Burmistrov A, Morozov V. Main stages of effective transport management system modernization in Russian agglomerations. Available from: https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/abs/2018/29/matecconf_spbwosce2018_05003/matecconf_spbwosce2018_05003.html. Accessed 2024 Jul 22. 62. Karlsson ICM, Mukhtar-Landgren D, Smith G, Koglin T, Kronsell A, Lund E, et al. Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service—A qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transport Res Part A Pol. 2020;131:283-95. 63. Danilina N. Intermodal system for mobility demand in the realities of the Russian Federation: reality and forecast. E3S Web Conf. 2016;6:02001. 64. Spirin IV, Matantseva OY, Grishaeva YM, Savosina MI. Planning of passenger transportation in the cities of Russia on the basis of sustainable development. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2019;632(1):012053. 65. Ryzkov A, Zuzin P. Urban Public Transport Development in Russia: Trends and Reforms. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2881277. Accessed 2023 Nov 22. 66. Petrov AI, Zakharov DA, Petrova DA. Experts on Resistance to Reorganization of Structure and Technologies of Urban Mobility Provision in Russia: Challenges, Reasons, Solutions and Prospects. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/130484. Accessed 2024 Jul 22. 67. Useche SA, Alonso F, Boyko A, Buyvol P, Makarova I, Parsin G, et al. Promoting (Safe) Young-User Cycling in Russian Cities: Relationships among Riders’ Features, Cycling Behaviors and Safety-Related Incidents. Sustainability. 2024;16(8):3193. 68. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, values and frames. Available from: https://archive.org/details/choicesvaluesfra0000unse. Accessed 2023 Dec 2. 69. Zheng Z. Empirical Analysis on Relationship between Traffic Conditions and Crash Occurrences. Proced Soc Behav Sci. 2012;43:302-12. 70. Wikipedia. List of cities and towns in Russia by population. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_and_towns_in_Russia_by_population. Accessed 2023 Dec 1. 71. Urban Environment Quality Index. Available from: https://индекс-городов.рф/#/cities. Accessed 2023 Dec 1. 72. Wilde GJS. Social interaction patterns in driver behavior: an introductory review. Hum Factors. 1976;18:477-92. 73. Ranney TA. Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. Accid Anal Prev. 1994;26:733-50. 74. Lajunen T, Parker D, Summala H. The Manchester Driver Behaviour Questionnaire: a cross-cultural study. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36:231-8. 75. Alcañiza M, Santolino M, Ramon L. Drinking patterns and drunk-driving behaviour in Catalonia, Spain: a comparative study. Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2016;42:522-31. 76. Kalašova A, Krchova Z. Road Users’ Risky Behavior: Analysis Focusing on Aggressiveness. Int J Veh Technol. 2011;2011(1):810273. 77. Kochetova TV. The Patterns of Drivers’ Traffic Behavior: Evidence from Three Countries. Front Psychol. 2022;13:869029.

引用本文

Artur I. Petrov*,Evgeniia V. Likhajrova. Sustainable Improvement of Road Safety in Russian Cities: General Trends and the Dialectical Contradictions in the Structure of Risks of Fatalities in Road Traffic Accidents, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2024; 6; (3). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr.20240042.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构