Students CSR Orientation: Building Dialogues between the Academic Community and the Business World-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Students CSR Orientation: Building Dialogues between the Academic Community and the Business World

Students CSR Orientation: Building Dialogues between the Academic Community and the Business World

ES评分 0 浏览量：296 下载量：0

DOI	10.20900/jsr.20240043
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2024, 6(3)
作者	Jucelia Appio Frizon,Teresa Eugénio*,Ana Morais,
作者单位	1 Centre for Applied Social Sciences, State University of Western Paraná, Cascavel, PR 85819, Brazil; 2 CARME—Center for Applied Research in Management and Economics, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria 2411-901, Portugal; 3 Advance/CSG, ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics & Management, University of Lisbon, Lisbon 1200-781, Portugal
Abstract	Background: This paper aims to verify whether the students’ expectations regarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives of companies,affect their CSR orientation, contributing to the dialogue between the academic community and the business world. It includes the opinions of undergraduate students in a business area. Methods: The methods involve a quantitative and descriptive approach, with the data collection being carried out through a survey of 524 responses. Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the scale’s internal consistency. To test the hypotheses, multiple linear regression was used—ANOVA, Durbin-Watson, coefficient of determination (R²), and regression coefficients (β).Results: The findings show that students have expectations, especially, in the development of the products and services to customers, and environmental aspects, and these impact the CSR orientation. They believe that companies should engage in corporate sustainability initiatives not only for financialprofit but also for reasons related to pure and altruistic social responsibility
KeyWord	sustainability; sustainable development goals; corporate social responsibility; accounting and management; student survey; regression equations
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1. Carroll AB. Corporate Social Responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR Construct’s Development and Future. Bus Soc. 2021;60(6):1258-78. 2. Carroll A. A three-domain conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev. 1979;4:497-505. 3. Carroll AB. Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Bus Soc. 1999;38(3):268-95. 4. Carroll AB. A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002. Accessed 2024 Jul 25. 5. Kosack E, Stone M, Sanders K, Aravopoulou E. Information management in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Bottom Line. 2021;34(1):20-44. 6. da Silva Junior A, de Oliveira Martins-Silva P, de Araújo Vasconcelos KC, da Silva VC, de Brito SLMS, Rocha Monteiro JM. Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in the opinion of undergraduate students in management programs: Between the concrete and the abstract. J Clean Prod. 2019;207:600-17. 7. Chung J, Cho CH. Current trends within social and environmental accounting research: A literature review. Account Perspect. 2018;17(2):207-39. 8. Sethi SP. Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework. Calif Manage Rev. 1975;17(3):58-64. 9. Sarkar S, Searcy C. Zeitgeist or chameleon? A quantitative analysis of CSR definitions. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:1423-35. 10. Rampasso IS, Anholon R, Silva D, Cooper Ordoñez RE, Santa-Eulalia LA, Quelhas OLG, et al. Analysis of the perception of engineering students regarding sustainability. J Clean Prod. 2019;233:461-7. 11. Ye M, Wang H, Lu W. Opening the “black box” between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: From a critical review on moderators and mediators to an integrated framework. J Clean Prod. 2021;313:127919. 12. PRME. A global movement transforming business and management education through research and leadership. Available from: https://www.unprme.org/about. Accessed 2021 Jul 29. 13. Celone A, Cammarano A, Caputo M, Michelino F. Is it possible to improve the international business action towards the sustainable development goals? Crit Perspect Int Bus. 2022;18(4):488-517. 14. Larrán M, Andrades J, Herrera J. An examination of attitudes and perceptions of Spanish business and accounting students toward corporate social responsibility and sustainability themes. Rev Contab Account Rev. 2018;21(2):196-205. 15. Gomes SF, Jorge S, Eugénio TP. Teaching sustainable development in business sciences degrees: evidence from Portugal. Sustain Account Mana. 2020;12(3):611-34. 16. Gomes S, Jorge S, Eugénio T. How important teaching SD is for the future accounting professionals? The perspectives of students and regulators. Bergan (Norway): EAA Annual Congress; 2022. 17. Galvão A, Mendes L, Marques C, Mascarenhas C. Factors influencing students’ corporate social responsibility orientation in higher education. J Clean Prod. 2019;215:290-304. 18. Simpson SNY, Aprim EK. Do corporate social responsibility practices of firms attract prospective employees? Perception of university students from a developing country. Int J Corp Soc Responsib. 2018;3:1-11. 19. González-Rodríguez MR, Díaz-Fernández MC, Pawlak M, Simonetti B. Perceptions of students university of corporate social responsibility. Qual Quant. 2013;47:2361-77. 20. Al Dhaen ES. The use of information management towards strategic decision effectiveness in higher education institutions in the context of Bahrain. Bottom Line. 2021;34(2):143-69. 21. Langrafe TF, Barakat SR, Stocker F, Boaventura JMG. A stakeholder theory approach to creating value in higher education institutions. Bottom Line. 2020;33(4):297-313. 22. Tarnovskaya V, Tolstoy D, Hanell SM. Drivers or passengers ? A taxonomy of multinationals approaches to corporate social responsibility implementation in developing markets. Int Mark Rev. 2022;39(7):1-24. 23. Esterhuyse L. Towards corporate transparency: The link between inclusion in a socially responsible investment index and investor relations practices. Bottom Line. 2019;32(4):290-307. 24. Vishwanathan P, van Oosterhout H, Heugens PPMAR, Duran P, van Essen M. Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta-Analysis. J Manag Stud. 2020;57(2):314-50. 25. Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1984. 26. Purnell LS, Freeman RE. Stakeholder Theory, Fact/Value Dichotomy, and the Normative Core: How Wall Street Stops the Ethics Conversation. J Bus Ethics. 2012;109:109-16. 27. Nagy S, Somosi MV. Students’ perceptions of sustainable universities in hungary: An importance-performance analysis. Amfiteatru Econ. 2020;22(54):496-515. 28. Ranängen H, Lindman Å. Exploring corporate social responsibility practice versus stakeholder interests in Nordic mining. J Clean Prod. 2018;197:668-77. 29. World Business Council for Sustainable Development
[WBCSD]. Corporate Social Responsibility: Making Good Business Sense. Available from: https://www.wbcsd.org/. Accessed 2021 Aug 9. 30. Kim H, Rhou Y, Topcuoglu E, Gug Kim Y. Why hotel employees care about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Using need satisfaction theory. Int J Hosp Manag. 2020;87:102505. 31. Su L, Swanson SR. Perceived corporate social responsibility’s impact on the well-being and supportive green behaviors of hotel employees: The mediating role of the employee-corporate relationship. Tour Manag. 2019;72:437-50. 32. Ahmad N, Ullah Z, Arshad MZ, waqas Kamran H, Scholz M, Han H. Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021;27:1138-48. 33. Asgary N, Li G. Corporate Social Responsibility : Its Economic Impact and Link to the Bullwhip Effect. J Bus Ethics. 2016;135:665-81. 34. Velte P. Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review. Manage Rev Q. 2022;72(3):627-75. 35. Wang C. Monopoly with corporate social responsibility, product differentiation, and environmental R&D: Implications for economic, environmental, and social sustainability. J Clean Prod. 2021;287:125433. 36. United Nations. United Nations Global Compact. Available from: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc. Accessed 2021 Jul 29. 37. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/. Accessed 2021 Aug 10. 38. Wang C, Ghadimi P, Lim MK, Tseng ML. A literature review of sustainable consumption and production: A comparative analysis in developed and developing economies. J Clean Prod. 2019;206:741-54. 39. Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira. Sinopse Estatística da Educação Superior 2019
[Statistical Synopsis of Higher Education 2019]. Available from: http://portal.inep.gov.br/basica-censo-escolar-sinopse-sinopse%3E. Accessed 2021 Jul 16. Portuguese. 40. Direção-Geral de Estatística do Ensino Superior. Tabelas de dados do Ensino Superior
[Higher Education Data Tables]. Available from: https://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/235/. Accessed 2021 Jul 16. Portuguese. 41. Hair Jr JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. London (UK): Pearson Education Limited; 2005. 42. Gujarati DN, Porter DC. Basic econometrics. 5th ed. Available from: https://ucanapplym.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/RGU/notifications/E_learning/0nline_study/Basic-Econometrics-5th-Ed-Gujarati-and-P.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jul 25. 43. Kim S. The COVID-19 pandemic and corporate social responsibility of Korean global firms: from the perspective of stakeholder theory. Emerald Open Res. 2023;1(4):1-16. doi: 10.35241/emeraldopenres.145 44. Freeman RE, Phillips R, Sisodia R. Tensions in Stakeholder Theory. Bus Soc. 2020;59(2):213-31. 45. Brasil. Resolução no 2, de 15 de Junho de 2012. Available from: http://portal.mec.gov.br/dmdocuments/rcp002_12.pd. Accessed 2022 Jun 2. 46. Shabana KM, Buchholtz AK, Carroll AB. The Institutionalization of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. Bus Soc. 2017;56(8):1107-35. 47. Oyewumi OR, Ogunmeru OA, Oboh CS. Investment in corporate social responsibility, disclosure practices, and financial performance of banks in Nigeria. Futur Bus J. 2018;4(2):195-205. 48. Fonseca L, Silva V, José Carlos S, Lima V, Santos G, Silva R. B Corp versus ISO 9001 and 14001 certifications: Aligned, or alternative paths, towards sustainable development? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2022;29(3):496-508. 49. Lyra MG, Gomes RC, Jacovine LAG. O papel dos stakeholders na sustentabilidade da empresa: contribuições para construção de um modelo de análise. Rev Adm Contemp. 2009;13:39-52. 50. Carroll AB, Shabana KM. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. Int J Manag Rev. 2010;12(1):85-105. 51. Dunham L, Freeman RE, Liedtka J. Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of Community. Bus Ethics Q. 2006;16(1):23-42. 52. Diez-Busto E, Sanchez-Ruiz L, Fernandez-Laviada A. The B Corp movement: A systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2021;13: 2508. 53. Fonseca L, Ramos A, Rosa Á, Braga AC, Sampaio P. Stakeholders satisfaction and sustainable success Amílcar Ramos and Álvaro Rosa Ana Cristina Braga and Paulo Sampaio. Int J Ind Syst Eng. 2016;24:144-57. 54. Mattingly JE. Corporate Social Performance: A Review of Empirical Research Examining the Corporation–Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data. Bus Soc. 2017;56(6):796-839. 55. Chien SC, Knoble C. Research of Education for Sustainable Development: Understanding New Emerging Trends and Issues after SDG 4. J Sustain Res. 2024;6(1):e240006. 56. Wang H, Jiao S, Bu K, Wang Y, Wang Y. Digital transformation and manufacturing companies’ ESG responsibility performance. Financ Res Lett. 2023;58:104370. 57. Rodríguez-Gómez S, López-Pérez MV, Garde-Sánchez R, Arco-Castro L. Increasing the commitment of students toward corporate social responsibility through higher education instruction. Int J Manag Educ. 2022;20(3):100710. 58. Fonseca L, Carvalho F, Santos G. Strategic CSR: Framework for Sustainability through Management Systems Standards—Implementing and Disclosing Sustainable Development Goals and Results. Sustainability. 2023;15(15):11904. 59. Teixeira A, Ferreira MR, Correia A, Lima V. Students’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility: evidences from a Portuguese higher education institution. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark. 2018;15(2):235-52. 60. Ferreira MR, Licandro O, do Paco A. How Postgraduate Students Understand The Corporate Social Responsibility Concept—A Comparative Approach Among Uruguay, Brazil, and Portugal. Responsib Sustain. 2020;5(1):12-25.

引用本文

Jucelia Appio Frizon,Teresa Eugénio*,Ana Morais. Students CSR Orientation: Building Dialogues between the Academic Community and the Business World, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2024; 6; (3). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr.20240043.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构