Ethical Partnership between Representatives of Institutions in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Projects-Journal of Sustainability Research-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库-手机版

Ethical Partnership between Representatives of Institutions in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Projects

Ethical Partnership between Representatives of Institutions in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Projects

ES评分 0 浏览量：282 下载量：0

全文阅读下载引用收藏

DOI	10.20900/jsr.20240052
刊名	Journal of Sustainability Research JSR
年，卷(期)	2024, 6(3)
作者	Alona Yevdokymova,Bohdan Kovalov*,Inna Balahurovska,Oleksandr Kubatko,
作者单位	1 Department of Management, Sumy State University, Sumy 40007, Ukraine; 2 Department of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Business Administration, Sumy State University, Sumy 40007, Ukraine
Abstract	Agenda 2030 underscores the necessity of a long-term perspective in project implementation and emphasises the facilitation of effective partnerships among diverse institutions based on their characteristics, cumulative experiences, and resource constraints. The study consists oftwo stages. The first stage involves a literature analysis, using Scopus, Web of Science, and the KnowSDGs web platform. The second stage covers the visualisation of interactions between leading institutions for the implementation of sustainable development projects. Colour coding was used to visualise the components of the ethical partnership model. The paper underlines centralsustainable development values such as justice, responsibility, freedom, dignity, democracy, life, quality of life, safety, and environmental stewardship. Ethical leadership alleviates societal tensions and fosters a culture of ethical collaboration, thereby facilitating the realisation of SDGs across economic, social, and environmental domains. To execute sustainable development projects, ethically grounded partnerships are formed among institutional representatives. The emergence of such ethical partnerships is a distinct goal and a means of achieving sustainable development objectives. The efficacy of ethical partnerships lies in upholding institutional ethics, supporting one another across management levels, and exemplifying ethical values in forging new partnerships. Theproposed ethical partnership model offers specialists a blueprint for cultivating sustainable intersectoral partnerships rooted in shared values to alleviate society’s scepticism towards institutional endeavours in sustainable development.
KeyWord	sustainable development; partnership; ethical partnership; leadership; social change; sustainable project
基金项目
页码	-

参考文献
相关文献

1. Ospina-Forero L, Castañeda Ramos G, Guerrero OA. Estimating Networks of Sustainable Development Goals. Inform Manage Amster. 2022;59(5):103342. 2. Mensah J. Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Soc Sci. 2019;5(1):1653531. 3. Laumann F, von Kügelgen J, Kanashiro Uehara TH, Barahona M. Complex interlinkages, key objectives, and nexuses among the Sustainable Development Goals and climate change: a network analysis. Lancet Planet Health. 2022;6(5):e422-30. 4. Le Blanc D. Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. Sustain Dev. 2015;23(3):176-87. 5. Edwards MG. The growth paradox, sustainable development, and business strategy. Bus Strategy Environ. 2021;30(7):3079-94. 6. Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M, Ringler C, McCollum D. A Framework for Understanding Sustainable Development Goal Interactions. Available from: https://council.science/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/SDGs-interactions-framework.pdf. Accessed on 20 Aug 2024. 7. By RT. Leadership: In Pursuit of Purpose. J Chang Manag. 2021;21(1):30-44. 8. Ahmad S, Islam T, Sadiq M, Kaleem A. Promoting green behavior through ethical Leadership: a model of green human resource management and environmental knowledge. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2021;42(4):531-47. 9. Breu T, Bergöö M, Ebneter L, Pham-Truffert M, Bieri S, Messerli P, et al. Where to begin? Defining national strategies for implementing the 2030 Agenda: the case of Switzerland. Sustain Sci. 2020;16(1):183-201. 10. Ordonez-Ponce E, Clarke A, MacDonald A. Business contributions to the sustainable development goals through community sustainability partnerships. Sustain Account Manag Policy J. 2021;12(6):1239-67. 11. Escher I, Brzustewicz P. Inter-Organizational Collaboration on Projects Supporting Sustainable Development Goals: The Company Perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12(12):4969. 12. Eweje G, Sajjad A, Nath SD, Kobayashi K. Multi-stakeholder partnerships: a catalyst to achieve sustainable development goals. Mark Intell Plann. 2020;39(2):186-212. 13. Henfrey T, Feola G, Penha‐Lopes G, Sekulova F, Esteves AM. Rethinking the sustainable development goals: Learning with and from community‐led initiatives. Sustain Dev. 2023;31(1):211-22. 14. Parrott L. The Ethics of Partnership. Ethics Soc Welf. 2008;2(1):24-37. 15. Wood G. A Partnership Model of Corporate Ethics. J Bus Ethics. 2002;40:61-73. 16. MacDonald A, Clarke A, Huang L. Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainability: Designing Decision-Making Processes for Partnership Capacity. J Bus Ethics. 2018;160(2):409-26. 17. Phillips R, Freeman RE, Wicks AC. What Stakeholder Theory is Not. Bus Ethics Q. 2003;13(4):479-502. 18. Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW. Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Acad Manag Rev. 2016;41:229-51. 19. Carroll AB. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Bus Horiz. 1991;34(4):39-48. 20. Jamali D, Mirshak R. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context. J Bus Ethics. 2006;72(3):243-62. 21. Daly HE. Sustainable Development: From Concept and Theory to Operational Principles. Popul Dev Rev. 1990;16:25-43. 22. Shi L, Han L, Yang F, Gao L. The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects. Sustainability. 2019;11(24):7158. 23. Dzage EJ, Szabados GN. The relationship of corporate social responsibility with business performance—a bibliometric literature review. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2637. 24. Obrenovic B, Oblakovic G, Asa AR. Bibliometric analysis of financial and economic implications during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2897. 25. Şimşek EK, Kara M, Kalıpçı MB, Eren R. Sustainability and the food industry: a bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):3070. 26. Fang C, Homma R, Qiu T. A bibliometrics analysis related to the built environment and walking. Sustainability. 2024;16(7):2850. 27. Sala S, De Laurentiis V, Barbero Vignola G, Marelli L, Sanyé Mengual E. The Consumer Footprint Calculator: Estimating the environmental impacts of the consumption of EU citizens and their lifestyles. Available from: https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/JRC129382_TR_Consumer_footprint_calculator_ONLINE.pdf. Accessed on 20 Aug 2024. 28. Miola A. Interlinkages and policy coherence for the Sustainable Development Goals. Available from: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1960464/interlinkages-and-policy-coherence-for-the-sustainable-development-goals/2712231/. Accessed on 21 June 2024. 29. Zielinski JM. Color coding basics. Rec Manage Q. 1990;24(3):34-7. 30. Dzelzkaleja L, Kapenieks J. Real-time color codes for assessing learning process. Proced Soc Behav Sci. 2016;231:263-9. 31. Abrahams G. Constructing definitions of sustainable development. Smart Sustain Built Environ. 2017;6(1):34-47. 32. Klarin T. The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues. Zagreb Int Rev Econ Bus. 2018;21(1):67-94. 33. United Nations. Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment—Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972. Available from: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/30829. Accessed on 20 Aug 2024. 34. United Nations. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Available from: https://www.are.admin.ch/are/en/home/media/publications/sustainable-development/brundtland-report.html. Accessed on 20 Aug 2024. 35. United Nations. The Rio Declaration—United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): UN; 1992. 36. UNSD. Welcome to UNSD. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/51st-session/documents/BG-Item3a-Interlinkages-Workstream-E.pdf. Accessed on 13 Sep 2023. 37. United Nations. United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York (US): United Nations Department of Public Information; 2000. 38. United Nations. The 17 Goals | Sustainable Development. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/goals. Accessed on 13 Sep 2023. 39. Lu Y, Nakicenovic N, Visbeck M, Stevance AS. Policy: Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nature. 2015;520(7548):432-3. 40. Karnib A. Water as Crosscutting Factor in the SDGs Under Review at the High-Level Panel Forum for Sustainable Development (HLPF) 2019 in the Arab States. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ali-Karnib/publication/334363696_Water_as_cross-cutting_factor_in_the_SDGs_under_review_at_the_High-Level_Political_Forum_on_Sustainable_Development_HLPF_2019_in_the_Arab_States/links/5d417d3592851cd046950413/Water-as-cross-cutting-factor-in-the-SDGs-under-review-at-the-High-Level-Political-Forum-on-Sustainable-Development-HLPF-2019-in-the-Arab-States.pdf. Accessed on 20 Aug 2024. 41 Stockholm Resilience Centre. The SDGs wedding cake. Available from: https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2016-06-14-the-sdgs-wedding-cake.html. Accessed on 13 Sep 2023. 42. National Project on the Development of Entrepreneurship. Available from: https://business.diia.gov.ua/handbook/sustainable-development-goals/cili-stalogo-rozvitku. Accessed on 13 Sep 2023. 43. European Commission. SDG interlinkages visualization tool—Goal level. Available from: https://knowsdgs.jrc.ec.europa.eu/interlinkages-goals. Accessed on 12 Sep 2023. 44. UN GA. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York (USA): United Nations; 2015. 45. Glasbergen P, Groenenberg R. Environmental partnerships in sustainable energy. Eur Environ. 2001;11(1):1-13. 46. UN GA. World Summit on Sustainable Development: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. New York (USA): United Nations; 2003. 47. Weitz N, Carlsen H, Skånberg K, Dzebo A, Viaud V. SDGs and the Environment in the EU: A Systems View to Improve Coherence Report Commissioned by the European Environment Agency. Stockholm (Sweden): Stockholm Environment Institute; 2019. 48. Van Huijstee MM, Francken M, Leroy P. Partnerships for sustainable development: a review of current literature. Environ Sci. 2007;4(2):75-89. 49. Stewart F. The Sustainable Development Goals: a comment. J Glob Ethics. 2015;11(3):288-293. 50. International Council for Science. Report: Review of Targets for the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective. J Educ Sustain Dev. 2015;9(2):237. 51. Brychko M, Bilan Y, Lyeonov S, Streimikiene D. Do changes in the business environment and sustainable development really matter for enhancing enterprise development? Sustain Dev. 2022;31(2):587-99. 52. Ryan A, Geiger S, Haugh H, Branzei O, Gray BL, Lawrence TB, et al. Emplaced Partnerships and the Ethics of Care, Recognition and Resilience. J Bus Ethics. 2023;184:757-72. 53. Whittington D. Effective Practice in Health and Social Care: A Partnership Approach. Learn Health Soc Care. 2006;5(4):243. 54. Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Reyers B, Kanie N, et al. Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain Sci. 2016;12(6):911-9. 55. Glass LM, Jens N. Governance for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: How important are participation, policy coherence, reflexivity, adaptation and democratic institutions? Earth Syst Gov. 2019;2:100031. 56. Ruggerio CA. Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Sci Total Environ. 2021;786:147481. 57. Mihelic KK, Lipicnik B, Tekavcic M. Ethical Leadership. Int J Manag Inf Syst. 2010;14(5). doi: 10.19030/ijmis.v14i5.11 58. Hogan R, Kaiser RB. What we know about Leadership. Rev Gen Psychol. 2005;9(2):169-80. 59. Eisenbeiss SA. Re-thinking ethical Leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. Leadersh Q. 2012;23(5):791-808. 60. Tushar H. The role of ethical Leadership in developing sustainable organisation. Australas J Law Ethics Gov. 2017;2:83-95. 61. Northouse PG. Leadership: Theory and Practice. New York (US): SAGE Publications; 2015. 62. Marquardt DJ, Casper WJ, Kuenzi M. Leader Goal Orientation and Ethical Leadership: A Socio-Cognitive Approach of the Impact of Leader Goal-Oriented Behavior on Employee Unethical Behavior. J Bus Ethics. 2021;172(3):545-61. 63. Greenleaf RK. Servant Leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. 2nd ed. New York (US): Paulist Press; 2002. 64. Nunes AR, Lee K, O’Riordan T. The importance of an integrating framework for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: the example of health and well-being. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1(3):e000068. 65. Bakan J. Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. London (UK): Little, Brown Book Group Limited; 2012. 66. Seitanidi MM. Social Partnerships and Responsible Business. New York (US): Routledge; 2013. 67. Leisinger K. Business needs to embrace sustainability targets. Nature. 2015;528(7581):165. 68. Mintzberg H. Rebalancing Society: Radical Renewal Beyond Left, Right, and Center. Oakland (US): Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2018. 69. Shvindina H, Lyeonov S, Vasilyeva T. Economic Growth and Regional Disparities: Literature Review in a Search for the Interconnections. In: Bhandari MP, editor. Reducing Inequalities Towards Sustainable Development Goals. New York (US): River Publishers; 2022. p. 27-48. 70. Kuzior A, Kettler K, Rąb Ł. Digitalisation of Work and Human Resources Processes as a Way to Create a Sustainable and Ethical Organisation. Energies. 2021;15(1):172. 71. Anderson CC, Denich M, Warchold A, Kropp JP, Pradhan P. A systems model of SDG target influence on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Sustain Sci. 2022;17(4):1459-72. 72. Kuzior A, Rozwoju AZ. Axiology of sustainable development. Bańska Bystrzyca (Slovakia): Matej Bel University; 2014. 73. Kotter JP. What leaders really do. IEEE Eng Manag Rev. 2009;37(3):18-28.

引用本文

Alona Yevdokymova,Bohdan Kovalov*,Inna Balahurovska,Oleksandr Kubatko. Ethical Partnership between Representatives of Institutions in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Projects, Journal of Sustainability Research. 2024; 6; (3). https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr.20240052.

文献评论

相关学者

相关机构