分裂谱系-双相情感障碍认知损害异质性的跨诊断分析

Cross-diagnostic analysis of heterogeneity of cognitive impairment on the schizophrenia-bipolar disorder spectrum

ES评分 0

DOI
刊名
Journal of International Psychiatry
年,卷(期) 2024, 51(1)
作者
作者单位

武汉大学人民医院 ;
孝感市康复医院精神科 ;
宜都市人民医院精神科 ;

摘要
【摘要】借助跨诊断聚类分析揭示分裂谱系障碍、双相情感障碍认知损害组内异质性特征。 方法 本研究入组264例受试:117例健康对照,55例双相I型,56例双相II型,以及36例分裂谱系障碍患者;评定所有受试神经/社会认知功能水平,以及焦虑、抑郁、躁狂、精神病性症状水平;将认知功能分数转为Z分后进行分层聚类分析,检测认知亚型,比较不同认知亚型间症状差异。 结果 经分层聚类分析共识别3个认知亚型:亚型1为轻度认知损害型,亚型2为中度认知损害型,亚型3为重度认知损害型。3个亚型中各疾病(精神分裂症谱系、双相I型、II型)占比差异存显著统计学意义(X2=20.412,P<0.0001):亚型1分裂谱系占比最小,双相II型占比最多;亚型2双相I、II型占比相当,均较分裂谱系多;亚型3分裂谱系占比最多,双相II型占比最小。亚型3的精神病性症状较亚型1(P=0.03)、2(P=0.03)重;亚型1(P=0.09,边缘显著)、2(P=0.05,边缘显著)较亚型3的焦虑症状重。 结论 在认知损害重的亚型患者精神病性症状更重;认知损害轻、中度亚型患者焦虑症状更重。分裂谱系障碍、双相情感障碍在认知损害的严重程度上是个“连续谱”:双相II型趋于轻、中度损害,双相I型趋于中度损害,分裂谱系趋于重度损害。跨诊断分层聚类分析有助于揭示重型精神障碍认知损害异质性及其临床症状特征。
Abstract
【Abstract】Objective Cross-diagnostic cluster analysis was used to reveal the intra-group heterogeneity of cognitive impairment in schizoaffective spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder. Methods In this study, 264 subjects were enrolled: 117 healthy controls, 55 bipolar I, 56 bipolar II, and 36 schizophrenic spectrum disorders. Neurological/social cognitive function, anxiety, depression, mania, and psychotic symptoms were assessed for all subjects. After converting the cognitive function score into Z score, hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to detect the cognitive subtypes and compare the symptom differences among different cognitive subtypes. Results Three cognitive subtypes were identified by hierarchical cluster analysis: subtype 1 was mild cognitive impairment, subtype 2 was moderate cognitive impairment, and subtype 3 was severe cognitive impairment. Among the three subtypes, the proportion of diseases (schizophrenia, bipolar I, and II) was statistically significant (X2=20.412, P<0.0001). Subtype 1 accounted for the smallest split spectrum, and bipolar II accounted for the largest proportion. The proportion of diphasic type I and II in subtype 2 was similar, and both were more than split lineages. Subtype 3 had the largest proportion of split lineages, and biphasic type II had the smallest proportion. The psychotic symptoms of subtype 3 were more severe than those of subtype 1 (P=0.03) and subtype 2 (P=0.03). Subtype 1 (P=0.09, significant margin) and subtype 2 (P=0.05, significant margin) had more anxiety symptoms than subtype 3. Conclusion The psychotic symptoms were more severe in the subtypes with severe cognitive impairment. Patients with mild and moderate cognitive impairment had more severe anxiety symptoms. Schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder are a "continuous spectrum" in terms of the severity of cognitive impairment: patients with bipolar II tend to have mild or moderate cognitive impairment; patients with bipolar I tend to have moderate impairment; and patients with schizoaffective spectrum tend to have more severe cognitive impairment. Hierarchical cluster analysis across diagnosis can help to reveal the heterogeneity of cognitive impairment and clinical symptoms of severe mental disorders.
关键词
精神分裂症;双相情感障碍;认知功能;分层聚类
KeyWord
Schizophrenia; Bipolar disorder; Cognitive function; Hierarchical clustering
基金项目
页码 49-53
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

宗小芬,卢隆莹,张苗苗,陈小磊,杜隆彬,董黎,殷淑娴,袁伟,贺振祥,陈胜泉,王如雪,腾汉颖,胡茂林*. 分裂谱系-双相情感障碍认知损害异质性的跨诊断分析 [J]. 国际精神病学杂志. 2024; 51; (1). 49 - 53.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构