| Abstract |
Objective: To study and analyze the performance of CSEA and TIVA anesthesia in laser lithotripsy in urology. Methods: This experiment spanned the period from August 2020 to August 2021. The researchers studied 100 patients who underwent laser lithotripsy in the urology department. In this experiment, the researchers divided the selected patients into groups according to the principle of double-blind control. The control group selected 50 patients under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, and the experimental group selected 50 patients under total intravenous anesthesia. The control group and the experiment were recorded. The heart rate, blood oxygen saturation and mean arterial pressure, cost of anesthesia, the incidence of patient discomfort, the incidence of body movement, and the probability of difficulty in entering the lens were analyzed and compared in the group of patients before and half an hour after anesthesia. Results: Before anesthesia, the difference in heart rate, blood oxygen saturation and mean arterial pressure between the control group and the experimental group was slight, (p>0.05). Half an hour after the anesthesia, the control group and the experimental group had similar data. Shows a large gap, (p<0.05); (950.7±84.9) yuan and (1576.2±149.3) yuan are the anesthesia costs of the control group and the experimental group, respectively. Analysis of relevant data shows that the difference is large, (p＜0.05) ); There is also a significant gap between the control group and the experimental group in the probability of discomfort, the incidence of body movement, and the probability of difficulty in getting into the lens, (p<0.05). Conclusion: All-intravenous anesthesia has a good performance in laser lithotripsy in urology, and the effect is far better than combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.
|