International Journal of Medicine and Data

Objective To explore the utility value of evidence-based nursing in improving the quality of intensive care in the Department of Neurology. Methods: A total of 148 critically ill patients in neurology were selected for comparative experiments in the study, and they were divided into two groups: control and observation by lottery. Each group of 74 patients. The former adopts conventional nursing methods and the latter adopts evidence-based nursing interventions. , Compare the actual satisfaction and the incidence of adverse events. Results: The research showed that after nursing intervention, the occurrence of adverse events such as pressure ulcers, pulmonary infection, and deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities in the observation group was significantly reduced, and nursing satisfaction was also improved, and they were better than those in the control group. (P<0.05). Conclusion: When carrying out nursing care for critically ill patients in the Department of Neurology, the adoption of evidence-based nursing interventions can maximize the overall quality of care, reduce the incidence of pressure ulcers, lung infections, and deep vein thrombosis in the lower extremities, and save the lives of patients. Provide health protection.

Evidence-Based Nursing; Neurology; Intensive Care; Quality Control