经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜行卵巢囊肿剥除术的临床效果差异及对卵巢储备功能的影响

The clinical differences in the efficacy of single port laparoscopic and traditional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy and their impact on ovarian reserve function

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ijcr.20240519
刊名
International Journal of Clinical Research
年,卷(期) 2024, 8(12)
作者
作者单位

苏州明基医院 江苏苏州 ;

摘要
探析经脐单孔腹腔镜和传统腹腔镜施行卵巢囊肿剥除术的临床效果,及对卵巢储备功能的影响。方法 本次研究对象为66例卵巢囊肿患者,抽取自本院2022年1月到2024年1月期间。按照治疗方法不同分为两组,即为采取传统腹腔镜施行卵巢囊肿剥除术的33例患者设为参考组,采取经脐单孔腹腔镜施行卵巢囊肿剥除术的33例患者设为实验组。对比两组治疗效果。结果 实验组手术相关指标相比参考组较短(P<0.05)。实验组卵巢储备功能优于参考组(P<0.05)。结论 经脐单孔腹腔镜施行卵巢囊肿剥除术的效果较为凸显,能够改善患者的手术相关指标,减少对卵巢储备功能的影响。此种治疗方法值得推广。
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical effects of single port laparoscopic and traditional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, and their impact on ovarian reserve function. Methods The subjects of this study were 66 patients with ovarian cysts, selected from our hospital from January 2022 to January 2024. According to different treatment methods, the patients were divided into two groups: the reference group consisting of 33 patients who underwent traditional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, and the experimental group consisting of 33 patients who underwent single port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy via the navel. Compare the therapeutic effects of two groups. Results The surgical related indicators in the experimental group were shorter than those in the reference group (P<0.05). The ovarian reserve function of the experimental group was better than that of the reference group (P<0.05). Conclusion Transumbilical single port laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy is more effective in improving patients surgical related indicators and reducing the impact on ovarian reserve function. This treatment method is worth promoting.
关键词
经脐单孔腹腔镜;传统腹腔镜;卵巢囊肿剥除术;临床效果;卵巢储备功能
KeyWord
Umbilical single port laparoscopy; Traditional laparoscopy; Ovarian cystectomy; Clinical efficacy; Ovarian reserve function
基金项目
页码 83-85
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

宋寒梅*. 经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜行卵巢囊肿剥除术的临床效果差异及对卵巢储备功能的影响 [J]. 国际临床研究杂志. 2024; 8; (12). 83 - 85.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构