静脉用药调配中心护理差错事件的影响因素分析

Analysis of influencing factors of nursing errors in intravenous drug dispensing center

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.cn.20240077
刊名
Contemporary Nursing
年,卷(期) 2024, 5(2)
作者
作者单位

山东省公共卫生临床中心 山东济南 ;

摘要
讨论及研究静脉用药调配中心护理差错事件的影响因素。方法 选择某医院280名护理人员作为本次研究的主要对象,时间范围为2022年6月1日至2023年1月31日,统计静脉用药调配中心护理差错事件的发生情况,通过多因素以及单因素分析,了解静脉用药调配事件发生的影响因素。结果 280名护理人员当中有42名护理人员发生过护理差错,发生率为15.00%;发生一次护理差错的护理人员数量为35名,2-3次的有4名,3次以上的护理人量为2名。通过多因素分析导致静脉用药调配中心护理差错的因素与护理人员的工作年限,职称级别、每年培训的次数、自我学习的习惯、护士职业倦怠感量表中的情感枯竭、去人格化、个人成就感有关。结论 结合静脉用药调配中心护理差错事件的多因素分析,制定相应的解决措施,降低护理差错事件的机率,提高护理效果。
Abstract
Objective To discuss and study the influencing factors of nursing error events in intravenous drug dispensing center. Methods 280 nurses from a hospital were selected as the main objects of this study, and the time range was from June 1, 2022 to January 31, 2023. The occurrence of nursing error events in intravenous drug dispensing center was analyzed. The influencing factors of intravenous drug dispensing events were understood through multi-factor and unifactor analysis. Results Among the 280 nurses, 42 had nursing errors (15.00%). The number of nurses with one nursing error was 35, the number of nurses with 2-3 times was 4, and the number of nurses with more than 3 times was 2. Through multi-factor analysis, the factors leading to nursing errors in intravenous drug dispensing center were related to nursing staffs working years, professional title level, annual training times, self-learning habits, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment in nurses burnout scale. Conclusion Combined with the multi-factor analysis of nursing error events in intravenous drug dispensing center, the corresponding solution measures were developed to reduce the probability of nursing error events and improve the nursing effect.
关键词
静脉用药调配中心;护理差错事件;影响因素
KeyWord
Intravenous drug dispensing center; Nursing error events; Influencing factor
基金项目
页码 110-112
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

黎桂兰*. 静脉用药调配中心护理差错事件的影响因素分析 [J]. 当代护理. 2024; 5; (2). 110 - 112.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构