基于EPC模式市政工程选择总承包商评价体系的构建

Construction of evaluation system for selecting general contractor of municipal engineeringbased on EPC model

ES评分 0

DOI 10.12208/j.ace.20240004
刊名
Advances in Constructional Engineering
年,卷(期) 2024, 4(1)
作者
作者单位

1 泰国格乐大学国际学院工程技术管理系 泰国曼谷 ;
1 泰国格乐大学国际学院工程技术管理系 泰国曼谷 2山东航空学院山东省黄河三角洲生态环境重点实验室 山东滨州 ;

摘要
市政工程选择承包商初始评价指标的元素较多,通过文献收集、专家咨询、问卷调查等方式,去除部分次要评价指标,最终选取了31项二级指标,分别对应6项一级指标,同时对定量指标进行说明,对定性指标进行量化,确定了基于EPC模式符合市政工程选择总承包商所需的评价指标。在此基础上对最终的评价指标进行主观赋权,通过对业内专家的咨询调查,基于专家对各层级各评价指标序关系的排列及相邻指标间重要性关系γa 的理性赋值,以一级指标为例做计算推演,对各层级每项评价指标进行主观赋值计算,得出各项指标的赋权结果,最终构建起一套基于EPC模式市政工程选择总承包商较为完整的评价指标体系。
Abstract
There are many elements in the selection of initial evaluation indicators for municipal engineering contractors. Through literature collection, expert consultation, questionnaire survey and other methods, some secondary evaluation indicators are removed, and 31 secondary indicators are finally selected, corresponding to 6 primary indicators, while quantitative indicators are explained and qualitative indicators are quantified. The evaluation indexes for selecting general contractor of municipal engineering based on EPC mode are determined. On this basis, subjective weighting is carried out for the final evaluation indicators. Through consulting and investigating experts in the industry, based on the ranking of the evaluation indicators at each level and the rational assignment of the importance relationship γa between adjacent indicators, the first-level indicators are taken as an example to calculate and calculate the subjective assignment of each evaluation indicator at each level, and the weighting results of each indicator are obtained. Finally, a complete evaluation index system for the selection of general contractors for municipal projects based on EPC mode is constructed.
关键词
问卷调查;专家咨询;评价指标;主观赋权;评价指标体系
KeyWord
Questionnaire survey; Expert consultation; Evaluation index; Subjective empowerment; Evaluation index system
基金项目
页码 16-23
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献
  • 引用本文

吴鹏波,张军*. 基于EPC模式市政工程选择总承包商评价体系的构建 [J]. 建筑工程进展. 2024; 4; (1). 16 - 23.

  • 文献评论

相关学者

相关机构